Studies have linked cross-national variations in occupational gender segregation with various economic, social and normative characteristics of countries. This study contributes to the research on the role of normative or ‘cultural’ characteristics by examining the influence of the level of technical progress, professionalization and Christian religion on cross-national variations in occupational gender segregation. The analysis is based on a sample of 33 countries. Variations in gender distribution are assessed using a reliable measure of occupational segregation, marginal matching. The analysis uses recent survey data (collected between 2002 and 2006) and a differentiated occupational classification scheme at the ISCO-88 3-digit level. Controlling for other confounding influences, the study finds higher occupational segregation of sexes in countries with higher levels of technical progress and in countries where Catholicism or Protestantism is a dominant religion.
AnkerR (1998) Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World. Geneva: International Labour Office.
2.
BarrettDBKurianGTJohnsonTM (2001) World Christian Encyclopaedia, 2nd Edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BettioF (2002) The pros and cons of occupational gender segregation in Europe. Canadian Public Policy28(1): S65–S84.
4.
BlackburnRMJarmanJ (2006) Gendered occupations: exploring the relationship between gender segregation and inequality. International Sociology21(2): 289–315.
5.
BlackburnRMJarmanJSiltanenJ (1993) The analysis of occupational gender segregation over time and place: considerations of measurement and some new evidence. Work, Employment and Society7(3): 335–62.
6.
BlackburnRMSiltanenJJarmanJ (1995) The measurement of occupational gender segregation: current problems and a new approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)158(2): 319–31.
7.
BlackburnRMJarmanJBrooksB (2000) The puzzle of gender segregation and inequality: a cross-national analysis. European Sociological Review16(2): 119–35.
8.
BlackburnRMBrowneJBrooksBJarmanJ (2002) Explaining gender segregation. British Journal of Sociology53(4): 513–36.
BrownKM (1994) Fundamentalism and the control of women. In: HawleyJS (ed.) Fundamentalism and Gender. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 174–201.
11.
ChangML (2000) The evolution of sex segregation regimes. American Journal of Sociology105(6): 1658–1707.
12.
ChangML (2004) Growing pains: cross-national variation in sex segregation in sixteen developing countries. American Sociological Review69(1): 114–37.
13.
CharlesM (1992) Cross-national variation in occupational sex segregation. American Sociological Review57(4): 483–502.
14.
CharlesMGruskyDB (2005) Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
CohenJ (2002) Protestantism and Capitalism: The Mechanisms of Influence. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
CohenJCohenPWestSGAikenLS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd Edition.Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
17.
DoladoJJFelguerosoFJimenoJF (2001) Female employment and occupational changes in the 1990s: how is the EU doing compared to the US?European Economic Review45(4/6): 875–89.
18.
DuncanDDuncanB (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indices. American Sociological Review20(2): 210–17.
19.
EdwardsR (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. London: Heinemann.
20.
EllisonCGBartkowskiJP (2002) Conservative Protestantism and the division of household labor among married couples. Journal of Family Issues23(8): 950–85.
21.
FoxBFoxJ (1987) Occupational gender segregation of the Canadian labor force, 1931–1981. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology24(3) 374–97.
22.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJAndersonRE (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th Edition.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
HakimC (2000) Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
InglehartRNorrisP (2003) Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
JacobsJALimST (1992) Trends in occupational and industrial sex segregation in 56 countries, 1960–1980. Work and Occupations19(4): 450–86.
26.
JamesDRTaeuberKE (1985) Measures of segregation. In TubaNB (ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1–31.
27.
JarmanJBlackburnRMBrooksBDermottE (1999) Gender differences at work: international variations in overall occupational gender segregation. Sociological Research Online4(1). Available (consulted 6 February 2013) at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk
28.
KlasenS (2006) UNDP’s gender-related measures: some conceptual problems and possible solutions. Journal of Human Development7(2): 243–74.
29.
KlasenSSchulerD (2011) Reforming the gender-related development index and the gender empowerment measure: implementing some specific proposals. Feminist Economics17(1): 1–30.
30.
LummisAT (2006) Gender and religion. In: ChaftezJS (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Gender. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic, 601–18.
31.
LummisATNesbitP (2000) Women clergy research and sociology of religion. Sociology of Religion61(4): 443–54.
32.
McCruddenC (1993) The effectiveness of European equality law: national mechanisms for enforcing gender equality law in the light of European requirements. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies13(3): 320–67.
33.
MeyerLB (2003) Economic globalization and women’s status in the labour market: a cross-national investigation of occupational sex segregation and inequality.Sociological Quarterly44(3) 351–83.
34.
Nanson-ClarkNFisher-TownsendB (2005) Gender. In: EbaughHR (ed.) Handbook of Religion and Social Institutions. New York, NY: Springer, 207–23.
35.
NorrisPInglehartR (2004) Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1980) Women in Employment. Paris: OECD.
37.
PampelFCTanakaK (1986) Economic development and female labour force participation: a reconsideration. Social Forces64(3): 599–619.
38.
PaxtonPHughesMM (2007) Women, Politics and Power: A Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
39.
ReskinB (1993) Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology19: 241–70.
40.
ReskinBRoosPA (1990) Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
41.
RidgewayC (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
SemyonovMJonesFL (1999) Dimensions of gender occupational differentiation in segregation and inequality: a cross-national analysis. Social Indicators Research46: 225–47.
43.
SmitsJUlteeWLammersJ (1998) Educational homogamy in 65 countries: an explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review63(2): 264–85.
44.
Thurnell-ReadTParkerA (2008) Men, masculinities and firefighting: occupational identity, shop-floor culture and organisational change. Emotion, Space and Society1(1): 127–34.
45.
United Nations (2007) Human Development Report 2007. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
