Using a large-scale data set, this article considers the role and growing importance of the Rights Commissioners in Ireland. The Rights Commissioners’ service, which has no parallel in any other anglophone industrial relations system, provides an informal and accessible method for the resolution of disputes and the vindication of employment rights. In recent years, the number of cases handled by the Rights Commissioners has grown hugely. A close examination of the cases handled by the service suggests that the Rights Commissioners allow vulnerable workers to pursue cases of alleged breaches of employment rights. The service is seen as holding lessons for other economies in terms of developing a model of economic citizenship that has as a dimension the enforcement of employment rights.
AyresIBrathwaiteJ (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BrownW (2004) The future of collectivism in the regulation of industrial relations. Human Resources and Employment Review2(4): 196–201.
3.
DickensL (2008) Legal Regulation, Institutions and Industrial Relations, Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations 89. Coventry: University of Warwick.
4.
DorfMC (2003) Legal Indeterminacy and Institutional Design. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, Paper 85. Available (consulted 3 April 2012) at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/85
5.
EdelmanL (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology97(6): 1531–76.
6.
EdwardsP (2007) Justice in the Workplace: Why It Is Important and Why a New Public Policy Initiative Is Needed, Work Foundation Provocation Series 2(3). Coventry: University of Warwick.
7.
EstlundC (2005) Rebuilding the law of the workplace in an era of self-regulation. Columbia Law Review125(2): 31–46.
8.
FreemanRHerschJMishelJ (2007) Emerging Labour Market Institutions for the 21st Century. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
9.
HannDTeagueP (2008a) The Role of the Labour Court in Irish Industrial Relations. Dublin: Labour Relations Commission.
10.
HannDTeagueP (2008b) The Role of the Rights Commissioners in the Irish Employment System: Solving Problems and Vindicating Rights. Dublin: Labour Relations Commission.
11.
HarzingAW (2001) Who’s in charge? An empirical study of executive staffing practices in foreign subsidiaries. Human Resource Management40(2): 139–58.
12.
HowellC (2005) Trade Unions and the State: The Construction of Industrial Relations Institutions in Britain, 1890–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
KellyJ (2006) Labour movements and worker mobilisation. In: AckroydS. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 283–304.
14.
KellyJFregeC (eds) (2004) Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalisation in a Globalising Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
KochanTShulmanB (2007) A New Social Contract: Restoring Dignity and Balance to the Economy. Briefing Paper 184, Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
16.
LipskyM (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Sage.
17.
LobelO (2006) Beyond experimentation: the case of health and safety administrative governance in the United States. In: De BurcaGScottJ (eds), New Governance and Constitutionalism in Europe and the USA. Oxford: Hart. Available (consulted 3 April 2012) at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=874837
18.
PioreMSaffordS (2006) Changing regimes of workplace governance, shifting axes of social mobilization and the challenge to industrial relations theory. Industrial Relations45(3): 299–325.
19.
PioreMOstermanPKochanTLockeR (2001) Working in America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
PollertA (2007) Individual employment rights: paper tigers, fierce in appearance but missing in tooth and claw. Economic and Industrial Democracy28(1): 110–39.
21.
RosanvallonP (2006) La contre-démocratie: la politique à l’âge de la défiance. Paris: Le Seuil.
22.
SaundersRDutilP (2005) New Approaches in Achieving Compliance with Statutory Employment Standards, Vulnerable Workers Series 6. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada.
23.
TeagueP (2006) New employment times and the changing dynamics of conflict resolution at work: the case of Ireland. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal28(1): 62–85.
24.
TrubetDTrubetL (2006) New Governance and Legal Regulation: Complementarity, Rivalry or Transformation, Wisconsin Legal Studies, Research Series 1022. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
25.
WeilD (2007) Crafting a progressive workplace regulatory policy: why enforcement matters. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal28(2): 125–43.
26.
WilsonP (1968) Varieties of Police Behaviour: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
