It is known that many children, including the learning disabled (LD), have difficulty in mathematics. Diagnostic information is required in order to plan techniques and strategies for dealing with these difficulties. This study investigated types of errors made by LD children by analyzing written responses to multiplication and division problems. Error classifications are discussed, and possible causes are presented. Particular emphasis is placed on the importance of thorough investigation of errors by teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshlockR.B. (1976). Error patterns in computation: A semiprogrammedapproach. (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
2.
BuswellG.T., & JohnL. (1929). Manual of directions for use with diagnostic chart for individual difficulties, fundamental processes in arithmetic.Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
3.
CawleyJ.F., & MillerJ.H. (in progress). The developmental considerations in mathematics acquisition in the mildly handicapped population.
4.
CoxL.S. (1975). Systematic errors in the four vertical algorithms in normal and handicapped population. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6, 202–220.
GinsburgH.D., & MathewsS.C. (1984). Diagnostic Test of Arithmetic Strategies.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
7.
JastakJ., & JastakS. (1978). Manual: Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
8.
LeporeA.V. (1979). A comparison of computational errors between educable mentally handicapped and learning disabled children. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 1, 12–33.
9.
LevyW.K. (1981). WISC-R arithmetic subtest performance of mathematically handicapped and nonhandicapped LD students as a function of presentation/response behaviors and vocabulary interactions. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 393–400.
NieN.HullC.JenkinsJ. Steinbrenner, K” & Bent, D. (1975). Statisticalpackage for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
PelosiR, & ShawR. (1977). Computational characteristics among secondary school students. Unpublished research report. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
13.
ResnickL.B. (1984). Beyond error analysis: The role of understanding in elementary school arithmetic. In H.N. Cheek (Ed.), Diagnostic and prescriptive mathematics: Issues, ideas, and insights (pp. 2–14). Kent, OH: Research Council for Diagnostic and Prescriptive Mathematics.
14.
WebsterR.E. (1980). Shortterm memory in mathematicsproficient and mathematics-disabled students as a function of input-modality/output-modality pairings. Journal of Special Education, 14, 67–78.
