Recent research in regular and special education has identified classroom variables that are positively related to student performance. Three variables together (instructional time, time on-task, and student success) make up academic learning time (ALT) and are especially important for learning disabilities (LD) teachers who wish to increase student achievement. The purpose of this article is to provide teachers with ideas and techniques designed to increase academic learning time in the LD classroom.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertoP., & TroutmanA. (1986). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
2.
AlgozzineB. (1985). Problem behavior management: Educator's resource service.Rockville, MD: Aspen.
3.
AndersonL.EvertsonC., & BrophyJ. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups. The Elementary School Journal, 79, 193-222.
4.
BettencourtE.GillettM.GallM., & HullR. (1983). Effects of teacher enthusiasm training on student on- task behavior and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 435–450.
5.
CarnineD. (1981). High and low implementation of direct instruction teaching techniques. Education and Treatment of Children, 4, 43–51.
6.
ChowS. (1981). A study of academic learning time of mainstreamed learning disabled students.San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research.
7.
CohenP.KulikJ., & KulikC. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248.
8.
DeshlerD.WarnerM.SchumakerJ., & AlleyG. (1983). Learning strategies intervention model: Key components and current status. In McKinneyJ. & L. Feagans (Eds.), Current topics in learning disabilities.Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 245–284.
9.
DuffyG., & McIntyreL. (1982). A naturalistic study of instructional assistance in primary grade reading. The Elementary School Journal, 83 (1), 15–23.
FisherC.BerlinerD.FilbyN.MarliaveR.CahenL., & DishawM. (1980). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. In DenhamC. & LiebermanA. (Eds.), Time to learn.Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
12.
FjellstedtN., & Sulzer-AzaroffB. (1973). Reducing the latency of a child's responding to instruction by means of a token system. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 125–130.
13.
GlynnE. (1970). Classroom applicaions of self-determined reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3,123-132.
14.
GoodT., & GrouwsD. (1979). The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project: An experimental study in fourth grade classrooms. Journal of Education Psychology, 71,355-362.
15.
GrahamS., & MillerL. (1983). Spelling research and practice: A unified approach. In MeyenE.VergasonG. & WhelanR. (Eds.), Promising practices for exceptional children: Curriculum implications.Denver: Love Publishing.
LeinhardtG.ZigmondN., & CooleyW. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 343–361.
18.
MaheadyL., & SainatoD. (1985). The effects of peer tutoring upon the social status and social interaction patterns of high and low status elementary school students. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 51-65.
RiethH., & FrickT. (1982). An analysis of academic learning time of mildly handicapped students in special education service deliver systems: Initial report on classroom process variables (Tech. Report). Indianapolis: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped.
21.
RosenbergM.SindelarP., & StedtJ. (1985). The effects of supplemental on-task contingencies on the acquisition of simple and difficult academic tasks. Journal of Special Education, 19,189-203.
22.
RosenshineB. (1980). How time is spent in elementary classrooms. In C. Denham & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Time to learn.Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
23.
SilbertJ.CarnineD., & SteinM. (1981). Direct instruction mathematics.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
24.
SindelarP.RosenbergM.WilsonR., & BursuckW. (1984). The effects of group size and instructional method on the acquisition of mathematical concepts by fourth grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 77,178–183.
25.
SindelarP.SmithM.HarrimanN.HaleR., & WilsonR. (in press). Teacher effectivness in special education programs. Journal of Special Education.
26.
SindelarP.WilsonR., & GartlandD. (1984). The effects of lesson format on the acquisition of mathematical concepts by fourth graders. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 40–44.
27.
SmithD., & LovittT. (1976). The differential effects of reinforcement contingencies on arithmetic performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 21–29.
28.
StallingsJ. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9,11-16.
29.
StevensR., & RosenshineB. (1981). Advances in research on teaching. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 1-9.
30.
WessonC., & WilsonR. (1986). Learning games that maximize opportunities for active student responding.Manuscript submitted for publication.
31.
WongB. (1979). Increasing retention of main ideas through questioning strategies. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 242–47.
