Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Emergent bilingual learners whose first language (L1) is Spanish and second language (L2) is English make up a large percentage of students who do not demonstrate proficiency in math. In 2024, 48% of fourth-grade students who were identified as English learners performed below basic proficiency in mathematics, compared to 21% of students who reported English as their primary language. This study investigated the relationship between instructional practices and late math difficulties (MD) in emerging bilingual children. Participants were emergent bilingual children (N = 230) clustered within 30 classrooms in Year 1, 32 classrooms in Year 2, and 26 classrooms in Year 3. Children were divided into three groups: Children with persistent MD (n = 46), children with late MD (n = 109), and average achievers (n = 75). A cross-level multilevel logistic model examined the extent to which the dosage or type of math instructional activities in Year 1 and Year 2 moderated the likelihood that average achievers and children with persistent MD varied from children with late MD at Year 3. At the student level, the likelihood of group differences in Year 3 was significantly related to earlier performance on Spanish measures of problem-solving, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. Direct instructional effects on the likelihood of later MD, independent of student characteristics, were related to the frequency of in-class activities that included guided practice and peer-to-peer interactions. Furthermore, the influence of early L1 achievement measures (i.e., problem-solving, comprehension, vocabulary) on later math achievement was moderated by guided practice, peer interactions, and fluency training. The results suggest that the frequency of instructional practices can reduce the occurrence of later MD in emerging bilingual children.

Keywords

math instruction teaching activities emergent bilingual English learner vocabulary

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguinis

Gottfredson

R. K.

Culpepper

S. A.

(2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188

Arizmendi

G. D.

Van Horn

M. L.

Petcu

S. D.

Swanson

H. L.

(2021). Language-focused interventions on math performance for English learners: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(1), 56–75. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.122 https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12239

Bell

B. A.

Morgan

G. B.

Schoeneberger

J. A.

Kromrey

J. D.

Ferron

J. M.

(2014). How low can you go? An investigation of the influence of sample size and model complexity on point and interval estimates in two-level linear models. Methodology: European Journal of Research Method for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000062

Bjork

I. M.

Bowyer-Crane

(2013). Cognitive skills used to solve mathematical word problems and numerical operations: a study of 6- to 7-year-old children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0169-7

Chatterjee

Simonoff

J. S.

(2013). Handbook of regression analysis. Wiley.

Chiu

M. M.

(2008). Flowing toward correct contributions during group problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 415–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802224830

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum Associates .

Cummins

(1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222

de Araujo

Roberts

S. A.

Willey

Zahner

(2018). English Learners in K-12 mathematics education: a review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 879–919. https://doi.org/10:3102/0034654318798093

10.

de Winter

J. C. F.

Dodou

Wieringa

P. A.

(2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(2), 147–181. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794206 https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794206

11.

Doabler

C. T.

Clarke

Kosty

D. B.

Baker

S. K.

Smolkowski

Fien

(2016). Effects of a core kindergarten mathematics curriculum on the mathematics achievement of Spanish-speaking English learners. School Psychology Review, 45, 343–361. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-3.343-361

12.

Doabler

C. T.

Clarke

Kosty

D. B.

Smolkowski

Kurtz-Nelson

Fien

Baker

S. K.

(2019). Building number sense among English learners: A multisite randomized controlled trial of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47, 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.08.004

13.

Dunn

L. M.

Dunn

L. M.

(2007). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-4. Pearson.

14.

Dunn

L. M.

Lugo

D. E.

Padilla

E. R.

Dunn

L. M.

(1986). Test de Vocabulario Imágenes Peabody [Picture Vocabulary Test]. American Guidance Service.

15.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

16.

Farnia

Geva

(2019). Late-emerging developmental language disorders in English-speaking monolinguals and English-language learners: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(6), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419866645

17.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Compton

D. L.

Powell

S. R.

Seethaler

P. M.

Capizzi

A. M.

Schatschneider

Fletcher

J. M.

(2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.29

18.

Fuchs

L. S.

Newman-Gonchar

Schumacher

Dougherty

Bucka

Karp

K. S.

Woodward

Clarke

Jordan

N. C.

Gersten

Jayanthi

Keating

Morgan

(2021a). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Intervention in the elementary grades (WWC 2021006). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences. http://whatworks.ed.gov/

19.

Fuchs

L. S.

Seethaler

P. M.

Sterba

S. K.

Craddock

Fuchs

Compton

D. L.

Changas

(2021b). Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000467

20.

Fuchs

L. S.

Seethaler

P. M.

Sterba

S. K.

Fuchs

Cutting

L. E.

Mancilla-Martinez

Espinas

(2024). Transfer between Reading comprehension and word-problem solving among children with learning difficulty in both domains. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(7), 1093–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000467

21.

Geary

D. C.

Hoard

M. K.

Byrd-Craven

Nugent

Numtee

(2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with Mathematical Learning Disability. Child Development, 78(4), 1343–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x

22.

Geary

D. C.

Hoard

M. K.

Nugent

Bailey

D. H.

(2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025398

23.

Gersten

Baker

(2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600402

24.

Gersten

Chard

D. J.

Jayanthi

Baker

S. K.

Morphy

Flojo

(2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431

25.

Goodrich

J. M.

Namkung

J. M.

(2019). Correlates of reading comprehension and word-problem solving skills of Spanish-speaking dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 48, 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.04

26.

Gorman

B. K.

(2012). Relationships between vocabulary size, working memory, and phonological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0063)

27.

Guglielmi

R. S.

(2023). Probing gaps in educational outcomes within the U.S.: A dual moderation multiple mediator latent growth model. Journal of School Psychology, 97, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2023.01.001

28.

Harvey

H. A.

Miller

G. E.

(2017). Executive function skills, early mathematics, and vocabulary in Head Start preschool children. Early Education and Development, 28(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1218728

29.

Hemphill

F. C.

Vanneman

(2011). Achievement gaps: How Hispanic and white students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NCES 2011-459). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.

30.

Hox

(2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

31.

James

Witten

Hastie

Tibshirani

(Eds.), (2013). An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R. Springer.

32.

Jarrett

(1999). The inclusive classroom: Teaching mathematics and science to English-language learners. U.S. Dept of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED455690.pdf

33.

Jordan

N. C.

Hanich

L. B.

Kaplan

(2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00571

34.

Kleemans

Segers

(2020). Linguistic precursors of advanced math growth in first-language and second-language learners. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 103, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103661

35.

Kong

J. E.

Arizmendi

G. D.

Doabler

C. T.

(2022). Implementing the science of math in a culturally sustainable framework for students with and at risk for math learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599221127385

36.

Kong

J. E.

Orosco

M. J.

(2016). Word-problem-solving strategy for minority students at risk for math difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(3), 171–181. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715607347 https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715607347

37.

Kong

J. E.

Yan

Serceki

Swanson

H. L.

(2021). Word-problem-solving interventions for elementary students with learning disabilities: a selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721994843

38.

Lei

Mason

R. A.

Xin

Y. P.

Davis

J. L.

David

Lory

(2020a). A meta-analysis of single-case research on mathematics word problem-solving interventions for English learners with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(4). httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12233

39.

Lei

Xin

Y. P.

(2023). A synthesis of mathematical word problem-solving instructions for English learners with learning disabilities in mathematics. Review of Education, 11(2), e3396. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3396

40.

Lei

Xin

Y. P.

Morita-Mullaney

Tzur

(2020b). Instructional scaffolds in mathematics instruction for English learners with learning disabilities: An exploratory case study. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 18(1), 123–144.

41.

Arizmendi

G. D.

Swanson

H. L.

(2022). The influence of teachers’ math instructional practices on English learners’ reading comprehension and math problem-solving performance in Spanish and English. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(10), 3614–3630. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2068346

42.

Liljequist

Elfving

Skavberg

R. K.

(2019). Intraclass correlation—A discussion and demonstration of basic features. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0219854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219854

43.

Lindholm-Leary

Block

(2010). Achievement in predominantly low SES/Hispanic dual language schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050902777546

44.

Lindholm-Leary

K. J.

(2005). Review of research and best practices on effective features of dual language education programs. Center for Applied Linguistics, 35, 17–23.

45.

Lonigan

C. J.

Allan

D. M.

Goodrich

J. M.

Farrington

A. L.

Phillips

B. M.

(2017). Inhibitory control of Spanish-speaking language-minority preschool children: Measurement and association with language, literacy, and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415618498

46.

Mathieu

J. E.

Aguinis

Culpepper

S. A.

Chen

(2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028380

47.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

(2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In Berch

D. B.

Mazzocco

M. M.

(Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities: Why is math so hard for some children? (pp. 29–47). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

48.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

Feigenson

Halberda

(2011). Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). Child Development, 82(4), 1224–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01608.x

49.

Mercer

(2008). Talk and the development of reasoning and understanding. Human Development, 51, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113158

50.

Miller

E. B.

(2017). Spanish instruction in Head Start and dual language learners’ academic achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 52, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.07.008

51.

Morgan

P. L.

Farkas

(2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408331037

52.

Muñoz-Sandoval

A. F.

Woodcock

R. W.

McGrew

K. S.

Mather

(2005). Bateria III Woodcock-Muñoz. Riverside Publishing.

53.

Murphy

M. M.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

Hanich

L. B.

Early

M. C.

(2007). Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 458–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400050901

54.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2011). Achievement gap: How Hispanics and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. U.S. Department of Education.

55.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2019). 2019 mathematics assessment. https://www.nations reportcard.gov/itemmaps/?subj=MAT&grade=4&year=2019

56.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2024). 2024 mathematics assessment. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/itemmaps/?subj=MAT&grade=4&year=2024

57.

National Center for Education Statistics (2011). Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education.

58.

National Center for Education Statistics (2020). Common core of data (CCD): Local education agency universe survey. U.S. Department of Education.

59.

National Center for Education Statistics (2024). Report on the condition of education. U.S. Department of Education.

60.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved September 2014 from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf

61.

Nunnally

J. C.

Bernstein

I. H.

(1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

62.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012a). Programme for international student assessment (PISA): Results from PISA 2012. Retrieved September 2020 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-US.pdf

63.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012b). PISA 2012 results in focus. Retrieved September 2020 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf

64.

Orosco

M. J.

Reed

D. K.

(2024). Supplemental intervention for third-grade English learners with significant problem-solving challenges. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 39(2), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982241229407

65.

Orosco

M. J.

Swanson

H. L.

O’Connor

Lussier

(2013). The effects of dynamic strategic math on English language learners’ word problem-solving. The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911416248

66.

Powell

S. R.

Berry

K. A.

Tran

L. M.

(2020). Performance differences on a measure of mathematics vocabulary for English learners and non-English learners with and without mathematics difficulty. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1677538

67.

Powell

S. R.

Driver

M. K.

Roberts

Fall

A. M.

(2017). An analysis of the mathematics vocabulary knowledge of third- and fifth-grade students: Connections to general vocabulary and mathematics computation. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.011

68.

Powell

S. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2015). Intensive intervention in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12087

69.

Preacher

K. J.

MacCallum

R. C.

(2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2(1), 13–43. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02

70.

Raborn

D. T.

(1995). Mathematics for students with learning disabilities from language-minority background: Recommendations for teaching. New York State Association for Bilingual Education Journal, 10, 25–33. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c057/add48d2609d6aa50ce19c2e92acc9b2b8462.pdf?_ga=2.139539123.1895809701.1592089435-267376517.1589152736

71.

Raven

J. C.

(1976). Colored progressive matrices. H. K. Lewis & Co. Ltd.

72.

Richards-Tutor

Aceves

Reese

(2016). Evidence-based practices for English learners. https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/EBP-for-english-learners.pdf

73.

Richards-Tutor

Baker

D. L.

Gersten

Smith

J. M.

(2015). The effectiveness of reading interventions for English learners: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585483

74.

Sáenz

L. M.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

(2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100302

75.

SAS Institute. (2014). SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements through release 9.4 .

76.

Schrank

F. A.

McGrew

K. S.

Ruef

M. L.

Alvarado

C. G.

Muñoz-Sandoval

A. F.

Woodcock

R. W.

(2005). Overview and Technical Supplement (Batería III Woodcock-Muñoz assessment service bulletin No. 1). Riverside Publishing.

77.

Secada

W. G.

(2009). All you need is math: A review of What’s Math Got to Do With It? Helping children learn to love their least favorite subject—and why it’s important for America. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(4), 460–465. https://search.proquest.com/docview/622042443?accountid=1452. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.4.0460

78.

Shapka

J. D.

Domene

J. F.

Keating

D. P.

(2006). Trajectories of career aspirations through adolescence and young adulthood: Early math achievement as a critical filter. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765752

79.

Shrout

P. E.

Fleiss

J. L.

(1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

80.

Siegel

L. S.

Ryan

E. B.

(1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60(4), 973–980. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131037

81.

Snijders

Bosker

(1999). Multilevel modeling: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage Press.

82.

Swanson

H. L.

Arizmendi

G. D.

(2023a). Emergent math difficulties among English learners: Can the odds be reduced? Child Neuropsychology, 29(1), 136–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2022.2073987

83.

Swanson

H. L.

Jerman

(2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002249

84.

Swanson

H. L.

Kong

Petcu

S. D.

(2022). The relationship between early classroom activities and English language learners’ later math problem-solving performance: An exploratory study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 37(4), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12280

85.

Swanson

H. L.

Kong

Petcu

Pimental

M. F. A.

(2020). Can difficulties in language acquisition and specific learning disabilities be separated in English language learners? Exceptional Children, 86, 293–309. https://doi.org/10:1177/0014402919893031

86.

Swanson

H. L.

Kong

Petcu

S. D.

(2023b). Stability of learning disabilities, cognitive growth, and L1 in English learners: A latent class and transition analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(3), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000771

87.

Swanson

H. L.

Olide

A. F.

Kong

J. E.

(2018). Latent class analysis of children with math difficulties and/or math learning disabilities: Are there cognitive differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000252

88.

Vukovic

R. K.

Lesaux

N. K.

(2013). The language of mathematics: Investigating the ways language counts for children’s mathematical development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.002

89.

Woodcock

R. W.

McGrew

K. S.

Schrank

F. A.

Mather

(2007). Technical manual. Woodcock-Johnson III normative update. Riverside Publishing.

90.

Woodcock

R. W.

Muñoz-Sandoval

A. F.

Alvarado

C. G.

(2005). Woodcock-Muñoz language survey. Riverside Publishing.

91.

Zheng

Flynn

L. J.

Swanson

H. L.

(2013). Experimental intervention studies on word problem-solving and math disabilities: a selective analysis of the literature. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 36, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712444277

Do Earlier Classroom Instructional Activities Matter in Overcoming Emerging Bilingual Children's Mathematical Difficulties? A Multilevel Analysis of Instructional Effects and First-Language Interactions

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References