This study investigated the effects of a combined contextual and morphemic analysis strategy to increase prediction and analysis of science vocabulary words by three high school (9th–10th grade) English language learners with reading disabilities. A multiple baseline across participants design was used. Students analyzed science words using the Clue Word Strategy (CWS). Dependent measures examined strategy use, morpheme and knowledge, and reading comprehension. In addition, student acceptability of the strategy was assessed. Results indicated that the CWS both increased and maintained students’ proficiency in analyzing science vocabulary. In addition, students enjoyed using the CWS strategy and recommended it to peers. Implications and limitations of the findings are delineated.
AugustD.CarloM.DresslerC.SnowC. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 50–57. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00120
2.
BarrS.EslamiZ.JoshiR. M. (2012). Core strategies to support English language learners. The Educational Forum, 76, 105–117.
3.
BaumannJ. F.EdwardsE. C.BolandE.OlejnikS.Kame-enuiE. J. (2003). Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth-grade students’ ability to derive and infer word meaning. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 447–494. doi:10.3102/00028312040002447
4.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.KucanL. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
BiancarosaG.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from http://www.all4ed.org/files/ReadingNext.pdf
6.
BrownV. L.WiederholtJ. L.HammillD. D. (2009). Test of Reading Comprehension (TORC-4). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
7.
CampbellN. A.WilliamsonB.HeydenR. (2003). Biology: Exploring life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
8.
CarloM. S.AugustD.McLaughlinB.SnowC. E.DresslerC.LippmanD. N.. . . WhiteC. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188–206. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3
9.
DavidsonJ.MillerJ. (2002). Scholastic’s READ 180: A heritage of research. New York, NY: Scholastic.
10.
De AvilaA.DuncanS. E. (2000). PreLAS 2000 technical manual, English. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
11.
EllisE. S. (2000). The LINCS vocabulary strategy (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
12.
FukkinkR. G.de GlopperK. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving word meaning from context: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 261–285. doi:10.310/00346543068004450
13.
GuionS. G.HaradaT.ClarkJ. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 207–226. doi:10.1017/S1366728904001592
14.
HarrisM. L.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2011). The effects of strategic morphological analysis instruction on the vocabulary performance of secondary students with and without disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 17–33.
15.
HasselerN. P. (2005). Vocabulary vine: A spiral study of Latin and Greek roots. Salinas, CA: Hasseler.
16.
KatzL. A.CarlisleJ. F. (2009). Teaching students with reading difficulties to be close readers: A feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 325–340.
17.
KiefferM. J.LesauxN. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 783–804.
18.
LesauxN. K.KiefferM. J.FallerS.KelleyJ. G. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 196–228.
19.
NagyW. E.AndersonR. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
20.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card: Reading 2011 (NCES 2012–457). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
21.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/pages/report.aspx
22.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
23.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2012). Digest of education statistics 2011 (NCES 2012-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
24.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
25.
SteeleS. C.WatkinsR. V. (2010). Learning word meanings during reading by children with language learning disability and typically-developing peers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24, 520–539.
26.
SwansonH. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instructional method. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 129–140.
27.
TawneyJ.GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
28.
WhiteT. G.SowellJ.YanagiharaA. (1989). Teaching elementary students to use word-part clues. The Reading Teacher, 42, 302–308. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20200115
29.
WIDA Consortium. WIDA English language proficiency standards and resource guide for pre-kindergarten through grade 12. (2007). WIDA Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.wida.us/standards/eld.aspx
30.
WilliamsT. (2005). A dictionary of the roots and combining forms of scientific words. Norfolk, UK: Squirrox.
31.
WittJ. C.ElliottN. S. (1985). Effectiveness of classroom management strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
ZehlerA. M.FleischmanH. L.HopstockP. J.PendzickM. L.StephensonT. G. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities (Special Topic Report No. 4: Findings on special education LEP students). Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
