This study used a mixed-methods approach to explore the impact of a fraction intervention on 46 sixth-grade students, including 13 with learning disabilities. Twenty-four students were enrolled in the classroom that received intervention, the remaining students participated in standard instruction. The intervention focused on sorting visual fraction representations as greater than, less than, or equal to a reference fraction within student-led, teacher-guided discussions. Performance on the Ordering Fractions pre- and posttest indicated that students participating in the intervention more frequently ordered a set of five fractions from least to greatest accurately (p = .001; ES = .74) and more accurately identified the lowest (p = .016; ES = .61) and highest (p = .014; ES = .63) fractions in the sets than peers in standard instruction. Analysis of student conversations suggested that students developed understanding of fraction magnitude by iteratively applying procedural and conceptual knowledge.
BaileyD. H.HoardM. K.NugentL.GearyD. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(3), 447–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004
2.
BaileyD. H.SieglerR. S.GearyD. C. (2014). Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge. Developmental Science, 17(5), 775–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12155
3.
BaroodyA. J. (2003). The role of psychological research in the development of early childhood mathematics standards. In ClementsD. H.SamaraJ. (Eds.), Engaging Young Children in Mathematics (pp. 149–72). Routledge.
4.
BoothJ. L.NewtonK. J. (2012). Fractions: could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 247–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.07.001
5.
BottgeB. A. (2001). Reconceptualizing mathematics problem solving for low-achieving students. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 102–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200204
6.
CarbonneauK. J.MarleyS. C.SeligJ. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031084
7.
CarnineD. (1997). Instructional design in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 130–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000201
8.
ClarkeB.NelsonN. J.Ketterlin GellerL.KostyD.SmolkowskiK.LesnerT.FurjanicD.FienH. (2022). Investigating the promise of a tier 2 sixth-grade fractions intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(4), 252–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720972411
CramerK. A.WhitneyS. (2010). Learning rational number concepts and skills in elementary classrooms: translating research to the elementary classroom. In LambdinD. V.LesterF. K. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Translating Research to the Elementary Classroom (pp. 15–22). NCTM.
12.
CramerK.WybergT. (2009). Efficacy of different concrete models for teaching the part-whole construct for fractions. Math Think Learn, 11(4), 226–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903246479
DysonN. I.JordanN. C.RodriguesJ.BarbieriC.RinneL. (2020). A fraction sense intervention for sixth graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties. Remedial Spec Educ, 41(4), 244–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518807139
15.
FazioL. K.BaileyD. H.ThompsonC. A.SieglerR. S. (2014). Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. J Exp Child Psychol, 123(2), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016.j.jecp.2014.01.013
FloresM.HintonV.TaylorJ. (2018). CRA Fraction intervention for fifth-grade students receiving tier two interventions. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(3), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1414027
18.
FrankeM. L.WebbN.ChanA. G.IngM. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109339906
19.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.HamlettC. L.CirinoP. T.JordanN. C.SieglerR.GerstenR.ChangasP. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446
20.
GerstenR. (2016). What we are learning about mathematics interventions and conducting research on mathematics interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(4), 684–688.
21.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: a meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431
22.
HansenN.RinneL.JordanN. C.YeA.ResnickI.RodriguesJ. (2017). Co-development of fraction magnitude knowledge and mathematics achievement from fourth through sixth grade. Learning and Individual Differences, 60(4), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.10.005
23.
HarbourK. E.DenhamA. R. (2021). Supporting all students: productive mathematical discourse in online environments. Interview Schedule for Clinicians, 57(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1177.10534512211001849
24.
HechtS. A.VagiK. J. (2010). Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 843–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019824
25.
HuangJ.NormandiaB.GreerS. (2005). Communicating mathematically: comparison of knowledge structures in teacher and student discourse in a secondary math classroom. Common Education, 54(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/146131905000077002
26.
HughesC. A.MorrisJ. R.TherrienW. J.BensonS. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142
27.
HuntJ.SilvaJ. (2020). Emma’s negotiation of number: implicit intensive intervention. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 51(3), 334–360. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresemtheduc-2019-0067
28.
HuntJ.TzurR. (2017). Where is difference? Processes of mathematical remediation through a constructivist lens. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48(4), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.06.007
29.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J.HwangS. Y.MoranoS. (2019). A systematic analysis of experimental studies targeting fractions for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12187
30.
Irwin, V., Wang, K., Jung, J., Tezil, T., Alhassani, S., Filbey, A., Dilig, R., & Mann, F. B. (2024). Report on the condition of education 2024 [NCES 2024-144]. National Center for Education Statistics.
31.
JitendraA. K.NelsonG.PullesS. M.KissA. J.HouseworthJ. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties?Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
32.
JordanN. C.HansenN.FuchsL. S.SieglerR. S.GerstenR.MicklosD. (2013). Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016.j.jecp.2013.02.001
33.
LegareC. H.LombrozoT. (2014). Selective effects of explanation on learning during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126(3), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.001
34.
LiuJ.XinY. P. (2016). The effect of eliciting repair of mathematics explanations of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(3), 132–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716657496
35.
Lortie-ForguesH.TianJ.SieglerR. S. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult?Developmental Review, 38(4), 201–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.008
36.
MazzoccoM. M. M.MyersG. F.LewisK. E.HanichL. B.MurphyM. M. (2013). Limited knowledge of fraction representations differentiates middle school students with mathematics learning disability (dyscalculia) versus low mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(2), 371–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.01.005
37.
MillerS. P.HudsonP. J. (2007). Using evidence-based practices to build mathematics competence related to conceptual, procedural, and declarative knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00230.x
38.
NamkungJ. M.FuchsL. S.KoziolN. (2018). Does initial learning about the meaning of fractions present similar challenges for students with and without adequate whole-number skill?Learning and Individual Differences, 61(1), 151–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.018
39.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). TIMSS 2019 U.S. Highlights web Report (NCES 2021-021). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/timss/results19/index.asp
40.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
41.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education.
42.
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. National Academies Press.
43.
PeltierC.PeltierT.HottB. L.HeuerA.WerthenT. (2021). “Trends come and go”: early childhood rural special education teachers’ use of reported practices during mathematics instruction. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(4), 214–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705211027981
44.
PetitM. M.LairdR.MarsdenE. (2010). Informing practice: they “get” fractions as pies; now what?Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 16(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtms.16.1.0005
45.
ResnickI.JordanN. C.HansenN.RajanV.RodriguesJ.SieglerR. S.FuchsL. S. (2016). Developmental growth trajectories in understanding of fraction magnitude from fourth through sixth grade. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 746–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000102
Rittle-JohnsonB.KoedingerK. (2009). Iterating between lessons on concepts and procedures can improve mathematics knowledge. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X398106
48.
Rittle-JohnsonB.MatthewsP. G.TaylorR. S.McEldoonK. L. (2011). Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: a construct-modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021334
49.
Rittle-JohnsonB.SaylorM.SwygertK. E. (2009). Learning from explaining: does it matter if mom is listening?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(3), 215–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.002
50.
Rittle-JohnsonB.SchneiderM.StarJ. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
51.
Rittle-JohnsonB.SieglerR. S.AlibaliM. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: an iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346
52.
RoessleinR. I.CoddingR. S. (2019). Fraction interventions for struggling elementary math learners: a review of the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 413–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22196
53.
ShinM.BryantD. P. (2015). A synthesis of mathematical and cognitive performances of students with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413508324
54.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.SusperreguyM. I.ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Association for Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101
55.
SieglerR. S.PykeA. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1994–2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031200
56.
SieglerR. S.ThompsonC. A.SchneiderM. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001
57.
SilvaJ. M.HuntJ. H.Welch-PtakJ. (2020). From (and for) the invisible 10%: including students with learning disabilities in problem-based instruction. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 54(4), 260–78. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0117
58.
SmithM. S.HughesE. K.EngleR. A.SteinM. K. (2009). Orchestrating discussions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(9), 548–56. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.14.9.0548
59.
SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. (2023). Dedoose Version 9.0. 107. Cloud application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. www.dedoose.com
60.
StricklandT. K.MacciniP. (2013). The effects of the concrete-representational-abstract integration strategy on the ability of students with learning disabilities to multiply linear expressions within area problems. Remedial and Special Education, 34(3), 142–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512441712
61.
TzurR.HuntJ. H. (2022). Nurturing fractional reasoning. In XinY. P.TzurR.ThoulessH. (Eds.), Enabling Mathematics Learning of Struggling Students (pp. 315–35). Springer.
62.
Van SteenbruggeH.RemillardJ.VerschaffelL.ValckeM.DesoeteA. (2015). Teaching fractions in elementary school. Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/683111
63.
WattS. J.WatkinsJ. R.AbbittJ. (2016). Teaching algebra to students with learning disabilities: where have we come and where should we go?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(4), 437–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414564220
64.
Witzel, B. S., Riccomini, P. J., & Schneider, E. (2008). Implementing CRA with secondary students with learning disabilities in mathematics. Interview Schedule for Clinicians, 43(5), 270–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208314734
65.
WoodwardJ.TzurR. (2017). Final commentary to the cross-disciplinary thematic special series: special education and mathematics education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(3), 146–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717690117
66.
XinY. P.ChiuM. M.TzurR.MaX.ParkJ. Y.YangX. (2019). Linking teacher-learner discourse with mathematical reasoning of students with learning disabilities: an exploratory study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719858707
67.
XinY. P.ParkJ. Y.TzurR.SiL. (2020). The impact of a conceptual model-based mathematics computer tutor in multiplicative reasoning and problem-solving of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100762
