Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-7
FHD deep learning prognosis approach: Early detection of fetal heart disease (FHD) using ultrasonography image-based IROI combined multiresolution DCNN
Fetal Heart Disease (FHD) is the most prevalent root cause of infant demise which accounts for 21% of all congenital abnormalities, with most instances being catastrophic, thereby rendering the need for early prognosis. Ultrasonography is the forefront imaging modality for assessing fetal growth in four-chamber and blood vessel malformation. Clinically diagnosing the abnormality is time-consuming and requires the skill of a radiologist. In subsequent, numerous preceding research strategies ideal to meta-heuristic and deep learning's Faster Artificial Neural Network (FANN), Dense Recurrent Neural Network (DRNN), Mask-Regional Convolution Neural Network (M RCNN) and Enhanced Deep Learning-assisted CNN aid in the identification of FHD. However, the prediction models have encountered multiple challenges owing to imprecise hinders and irrelevant adhesion. Hence, we propose the automated hierarchical network-driven findings of FHD in four-chamber and blood vessels using ultrasonic 2D imaging which undergoes 3 consequential processes of Enhanced-Adaptive Median Filtering (EAMF) pre-process concerning noise variations i.e., test for SNR distortion and image enhancement i.e., visual quality, Intensified Region of Interest (IROI) segmentation for exploiting feature selection via spatial mask-labeling and Multiresolution Deep Convolutional Neural Network (MDCNN) classification in the detection of diseased pattern via confusion metrics (CM). The lesion findings of CM is determined using MATLAB R2023b with an overall substantial efficiency of 99.79% in both normal and abnormal conditions with a significant potential to assist cardiologists in the prognosis of FHD.
LiuADillerGPMoonsP, et al.Changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease: effect on outcomes and quality of care in adults. Nat Rev Cardiol.2023 Feb; 20: 126–137.
2.
SnoepMCBetBBZwanenburgF, et al.Factors related to fetal demise in cases with congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecology MFM2023 Aug 1; 5: 101023.
3.
ErenelHKarsliMFOzelA, et al.The importance of four-chamber and three-vessel (3-V) views in the screening of fetal cardiac anomalies in the first trimester. Perinatal J2019; 27: 169–175.
4.
BradleyEAZaidiAN. Atrial septal defect. Cardiol Clin.2020 Aug 1; 38: 317–324.
5.
VorisekCNZurakowskiDTamayoA, et al.Postnatal circulation in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing fetal aortic valvuloplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.2022 May; 59: 576–584.
6.
SakamotoYOkadaSMaekawaR, et al.Fetal cardiac capillary hemangioma resulting in tachyarrhythmia. Echocardiography2022 Nov; 39: 1457–1461.
BernolianNKestyCWidodoBW. Current update on congenital heart disease screening in pregnancy. Majalah Kedokteran Sriwijaya2020 Jul 17; 52: 328–331.
10.
MenahemSSehgalAMeagherS. Early detection of significant congenital heart disease: the contribution of fetal cardiac ultrasound and newborn pulse oximetry screening. J Paediatr Child Health.2021 Mar; 57: 323–327.
11.
SatishSRufusNH. Investigation on ultrasound images for detection of fetal congenital heart defects. Biomed Phys Eng Express2024 May 31; 10: 042001.
12.
Bravo-ValenzuelaNJPeixotoABAraujoE. Editors. Second trimester fetal cardiac screening–current opinion. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2023 Feb; 45: 055–058.
QiXZhaoBGuoY, et al.Quantitative study of early fetal echocardiography on normal fetal ventricular diameter and z-score. Chin J Ultrasonogr2020; 29: 427–433.
TsunekiM. Deep learning models in medical image analysis. J Oral Biosci2022 Sep 1; 64: 312–320.
17.
AliRManikandanALeiR,et al.A novel SpaSA based hyper-parameter optimized FCEDN with adaptive CNN classification for skin cancer detection. Sci Rep.2024; 14: 9336.
18.
de VriesIRvan LaarJOvan der Hout-van der JagtMB, et al.Fetal electrocardiography and artificial intelligence for prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.2023 Nov; 102: 1511–1520.
19.
XiaoSZhangJZhuY, et al.Application and progress of artificial intelligence in fetal ultrasound. J Clin Med.2023 May 5; 12: 3298.
20.
Ramirez ZegarraRGhiT. Use of artificial intelligence and deep learning in fetal ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.2023 Aug; 62: 185–194.
21.
YanLLingSMaoR, et al.A deep learning framework for identifying and segmenting three vessels in fetal heart ultrasound images. Biomed Eng Online.2024; 23: 39.
22.
YangYWuBWuH, et al.Classification of normal and abnormal fetal heart ultrasound images and identification of ventricular septal defects based on deep learning. J Perinat Med.2023 Oct 26; 51: 1052–1058.
23.
FiorentinoMCVillaniFPDi CosmoM, et al.A review on deep-learning algorithms for fetal ultrasound-image analysis. Med Image Anal.2023 Jan 1; 83: 102629.
24.
KomatsuMSakaiAKomatsuR, et al.Detection of cardiac structural abnormalities in fetal ultrasound videos using deep learning. Appl Sci.2021 Jan 2; 11: 71.
25.
ShaliniPKSainiSharmaYM. An intelligent hybrid model for forecasting of heart and diabetes diseases with SMO and ANN. In: Intelligent energy management technologies: ICAEM 2019 2020 Dec 2. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp.133–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8820-4_13
26.
KhanMUSamerSAlshehriMD, et al.Artificial neural network-based cardiovascular disease prediction using spectral features. Comput Electr Eng.2022 Jul 1; 101: 108094.
27.
SomeshwaranGSaradaV. An improved detection of fetal heart disease using multilayer perceptron. In: International conference on intelligent computing for sustainable development 2023 Aug 25. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp.186–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61298-5_15
28.
DasSMukherjeeHObaidullahSM, et al.Recurrent neural network based classification of fetal heart rate using cardiotocograph. In: Recent trends in image processing and pattern recognition: second international conference, RTIP2R 2018, Solapur, India, December 21–22, 2018, revised selected papers, part II 2 2019. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, pp.226–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9184-2_20
29.
WangJKChangYFTsaiKH, et al.Automatic recognition of murmurs of ventricular septal defect using convolutional recurrent neural networks with temporal attentive pooling. Sci Rep.2020 Dec 11; 10: 21797.
30.
WangYZhangW. A dense RNN for sequential four-chamber view left ventricle wall segmentation and cardiac state estimation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol.2021 Aug 6; 9: 696227.
31.
KrishnanSMagalingamPIbrahimR. Enhanced recurrent neural network (RNN) for heart disease risk prediction using framingham datasets. Open International Journal of Informatics2023 Jun 27; 11: 41–52.
32.
GongYZhangYZhuH, et al.Fetal congenital heart disease echocardiogram screening based on DGACNN: adversarial one-class classification combined with video transfer learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging.2019 Oct 7; 39: 1206–1222.
33.
XuLLiuMShenZ, et al.DW-Net: a cascaded convolutional neural network for apical four-chamber view segmentation in fetal echocardiography. Comput Med Imaging Graph.2020 Mar 1; 80: 101690.
34.
NurmainiSRachmatullahMNSapitriAI, et al.Accurate detection of septal defects with fetal ultrasonography images using deep learning-based multiclass instance segmentation. IEEE Access2020 Oct 28; 8: 196160–74.
35.
RachmatullahMNNurmainiSSapitriAI, et al.Convolutional neural network for semantic segmentation of fetal echocardiography based on four-chamber view. Bull Electr Eng Inf2021 Aug 1; 10: 1987–1996.
36.
PanYFuMChengB, et al.Enhanced deep learning assisted convolutional neural network for heart disease prediction on the internet of medical things platform. IEEE Access2020 Sep 23; 8: 189503–12.
37.
BhaskaranAAroraM. Indian Institute of Science Fetal Heart Sound Database (IIScFHSDB) (version 1.0). PhysioNet2022; 101: e215–e220. https://doi.org/10.13026/9vvw-cx05
38.
SoniHSankheD. Image restoration using adaptive median filtering. Image (IN).2019 Oct; 6: 841–844.
39.
KalaiselviK.Adaptive median filter based noise removal algorithm for big image data. 2019.
40.
RossiLKarimiAPratiA. A novel region of interest extraction layer for instance segmentation. In: 2020 25th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR) 2021 Jan 10. Milan, Italy: IEEE, 2021, pp.2203–2209. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412258
41.
GaleaRRDiosanLAndreicaA, et al.Region-of-interest-based cardiac image segmentation with deep learning. Appl Sci.2021 Feb 23; 11: 1965.
42.
AliRManikandanAXuJ. A novel framework of adaptive fuzzy-GLCM segmentation and fuzzy with capsules network (F-CapsNet) classification. Neural Comput Appl2023 Oct; 35: 22133–22149.
