As China’s average income and concerns about sustainability increase, will it adopt Western practices promoting sustainability in global value chains? I address this question by examining the trends of affirmation of palm oil sustainability governance in the country. By combining literature on transnational voluntary sustainability standards (TVSS) with analytical tools from Global China scholarship, I investigate the attempted diffusion in China of TVSS sponsored by the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (hereafter RSPO) and the reactions of key actor groups to this process. Research findings reveal a diversity of responses from various actors, underpinned by a trend of rejection of TVSS and an overall stance of non-intervention in palm oil sustainability. The existence of producer countries’ national and state-led standards concerning sustainable palm oil, notably those of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil and Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil, has directly contributed to shaping this stance by weakening the RSPO’s claim to be a ‘global’ standard and lowering the perceived need for buyer-driven initiatives.
BrandiClara (2014) Low-carbon standards and labels in China. Oxford Development Studies42(2): 172–89.
5.
BuckinghamKathleenJepsonPaul (2013) Forest certification with Chinese characteristics: State engagement with non-state market-driven governance. Eurasian Geography and Economics54(3): 280–99.
6.
CartyAnthonyGuJing (2021) Theory and Practice in China’s Approaches to Multilateralism and Critical Reflections on the Western ‘Rules-Based International Order’. IDS Research Report85, 26 October. 10.19088/IDS.2021.057, accessed 15 September 2025.
7.
ChenJuanInnesJohn L.KozakRobert A. (2011) An exploratory assessment of the attitudes of Chinese wood products manufacturers towards forest certification. Journal of Environmental Management92(11): 2984–92.
8.
ChenSi (2024) Shaping corporate social responsibility standards in the global economy: Chinese industry guidelines for responsible mineral supply chains. China Information38(2): 244–66.
DriessenMiriamZhuRuiyi (2024) Chinese standards from the ground up. China Information38(2): 135–56.
11.
EarnhartDietrich H.KhannaMadhuLyonThomas P. (2014) Corporate environmental strategies in emerging economies. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy8(2): 164–85.
12.
FabianoFlaviaDavironBenoit (2024) China reshaping green value chain initiatives: Between global and Southern standards. Third World Quarterly45(1): 151–70.
13.
FikruMahelet G. (2014) International certification in developing countries: The role of internal and external institutional pressure. Journal of Environmental Management144: 286–96.
14.
FukaseEmikoMartinWill (2020) Economic growth, convergence, and world food demand and supply. World Development132. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104954,accessed 15 September 2025.
15.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L. (2017) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
GuJingHumphreyJohnMessnerDirk (2008) Global governance and developing countries: The implications of the rise of China. World Development36(2): 274–92.
18.
GuarínAlejandroKnorringaPeter (2014) New middle-class consumers in rising powers: Responsible consumption and private standards. Oxford Development Studies42(2): 151–71.
19.
GuttmanDan, et al. (2018) Environmental governance in China: Interactions between the state and ‘nonstate actors’. Journal of Environmental Management220: 126–35.
20.
HigginsVaughanRichardsCarol (2019) Framing sustainability: Alternative standards schemes for sustainable palm oil and South-South trade. Journal of Rural Studies65: 126–34.
21.
HopewellKristen (2016) Breaking the WTO: How Emerging Powers Disrupted the Neoliberal Project. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
22.
HornerRoryNadviKhalid (2018) Global value chains and the rise of the Global South: Unpacking twenty-first century polycentric trade. Global Networks18(2): 207–37.
23.
HospesOtto (2014) Marking the success or end of global multi-stakeholder governance? The rise of national sustainability standards in Indonesia and Brazil for palm oil and soy. Agriculture and Human Values31(3): 425–37.
24.
IwealaSarahSunYixian (2022) The many aspects of voluntary sustainability governance: Unpacking consumers’ support for tea standards in China and the UK. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption7. 10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100080,accessed 16 September 2025.
25.
KadarusmanYohanes BerenikaPramudyaEusebius Pantja (2019) The effects of India and China on the sustainability of palm oil production in Indonesia: Towards a better understanding of the dynamics of regional sustainability governance. Sustainable Development27(5): 898–909.
26.
KaplinskyRaphaelTerheggenAnneTijajaJulia (2011) China as a final market: The Gabon timber and Thai cassava value chains. World Development39(7): 1177–90.
MarxAxel (2017) The public–private distinction in global governance: How relevant is it in the case of voluntary sustainability standards?Chinese Journal of Global Governance3(1): 1–26.
32.
MarxAxel, et al. (2024) Global governance through voluntary sustainability standards: Developments, trends and challenges. Global Policy15(4): 708–28.
33.
MichidaEtsuyoHumphreyJohnVogelDavid (eds) (2021) The Diffusion of Public and Private Sustainability Regulations: The Responses of Follower Countries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
34.
NadviKhalid (2014) ‘Rising powers’ and labour and environmental standards. Oxford Development Studies42(2): 137–50.
35.
NedopilChristophDordiTruzaarWeberOlaf (2021) The nature of global green finance standards – Evolution, differences, and three models. Sustainability13(7). 10.3390/su13073723,accessed 18 September 2025.
36.
Oliveira, Gustavo de L. T. and Schneider, Mindi (2016) The politics of flexing soybeans: China, Brazil and global agroindustrial restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies 43(1): 167–94.
37.
PachecoPablo, et al. (2020) Governing sustainable palm oil supply: Disconnects, complementarities, and antagonisms between state regulations and private standards. Regulation & Governance14(3): 568–98.
38.
PonteStefanoGibbonPeter (2005) Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains. Economy and Society34(1): 1–31.
39.
PrakashAseemPotoskiMatthew (2006) Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 350–64.
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (2012) RT9 2011 PS1 Teoh Cheng Hai – Spearheading development. YouTube, 19 November. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9cFnZnSrd8, accessed 20 September 2025.
43.
SautmanBarryYanHairong (2007) Friends and interests: China’s distinctive links with Africa. African Studies Review50(3): 75–114.
44.
SchleiferPhilipSunYixian (2018) Emerging markets and private governance: The political economy of sustainable palm oil in China and India. Review of International Political Economy25(2): 190–214.
45.
SchneiderMindi (2017) Dragon head enterprises and the state of agribusiness in China. Journal of Agrarian Change17(1): 3–21.
46.
SchoutenGreetjeBitzerVerena (2015) The emergence of Southern standards in agricultural value chains: A new trend in sustainability governance?Ecological Economics120: 175–84.
47.
SunYixian (2022) Certifying China: The Rise and Limits of Transnational Sustainability Governance in Emerging Economies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
SunYixianvan der VenHamish (2020) Swimming in their own direction: Explaining domestic variation in homegrown sustainability governance for aquaculture in Asia. Ecological Economics167. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106445, accessed 18 September 2025.
van der VenHamish (2018) Gatekeeper power: Understanding the influence of lead firms over transnational sustainability standards. Review of International Political Economy25(5): 624–46.
51.
van der VenHamishSunYixianCashoreBenjamin (2021) Sustainable commodity governance and the global south. Ecological Economics186. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107062,accessed 19 September 2025.
52.
WangJianhuaTaoJunyingChuMay (2020) Behind the label: Chinese consumers’ trust in food certification and the effect of perceived quality on purchase intention. Food Control108. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106825, accessed 18 September 2025.
53.
WassmannBiancaSiegristMichaelHartmannChristina (2023) Palm oil and the Roundtable of Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) label: Are Swiss consumers aware and concerned?Food Quality and Preference103. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104686, accessed 18 September 2025.
54.
YuXiaohuaGaoZhifengZengYinchu (2014) Willingness to pay for the ‘Green Food’ in China. Food Policy45: 80–7.
55.
ZadekSimon (2010) Emerging nations and sustainability: Chimera or leadership?Politeia26(98): 153–67.
