Decentralized court finance and personnel management practices have been criticized for breeding extra-judicial interventions and corruption in China. Determined to advance law-based governance and to constrain recalcitrant local leaders, the Chinese leadership under Xi Jinping in 2014 rolled out reforms to centralize local court finance to the provincial level with the aim to sever local courts from local influence. Despite high expectations, implementation is at best partial. Close to half of all provinces have not accomplished the required changes, and more than half of all court expenditure continues, to date, to remain reliant upon local governments. The direct reason is that provincial governments lack sufficient and sustainable fiscal capacity to finance the operation of local courts without central assistance. Different interests between major stakeholders, namely the courts and the fiscal bureaus, also add to coordination problems and difficulties in reform implementation, in particular the tension between fiscal adequacy pursued by the judiciary and fiscal management efficiency stressed by finance bureaus.
我国法官检察官试点单独职务序列 工资将上涨 (China launched the pilot programme on setting an independent sequence of posts for judges and procurators and their salaries will be raised) (2015) 16 September. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-09/16/c_128233946.htm, accessed 9 August 2022.
5.
DouglasJames W.HartleyRoger E. (2003) The politics of court budgeting in the states: Is judicial independence threatened by the budgetary process?Public Administration Review63(4): 441–54.
FanLisi 范丽思 (2021) 省级统管后法院经费保障机制再造 (Reconstruction of the court’s funding guarantee mechanism after [the court finance centralization]). 人民司法 (People’s judicature), no. 22: 72–8.
9.
GaoYunxiao 高云霄 (2013) 关于政法经费保障机制改革情况的调研报告 (Research report on reforming the mechanism for ensuring funding for political-legal units). 经济研究参考 (Review of economic research), no. 40: 12–14.
10.
HeXin 賀欣 (2008) 中國法院的財政不足與司法腐敗 (Insufficient funding for China’s courts and judicial corruption). 二十一世紀 (Twenty-first century), no. 105: 12–23.
11.
HeXin (2009) Court finance and court responses to judicial reforms: A tale of two Chinese courts. Law & Policy31(4): 463–86.
12.
JiangHuiling 蒋惠岭 (1998) 司法权力地方化之利弊与改革 (The advantages and disadvantages of localization of judicial authority). 人民司法 (People’s judicature), no. 2: 29–31.
13.
JinYu 靳羽 (2008) 处在十字路口的法院经费保障体制: 困境加剧抑或曙光乍现 (Court’s funding guarantee system at the crossroads: Worsening situation or new hope). 法治研究 (Research on the rule of law), no. 10: 34–41.
14.
KiratThierry (2010) Performance-based budgeting and management of judicial courts in France: An assessment.International Journal for Court Administration2(2): 12–20.
15.
LiAnthony H. F. (2016) Centralization of power in the pursuit of law-based governance: Legal reform in China under the Xi administration. China Perspectives2016/2: 63–8.
16.
LiLinda ChelanYangZhenjie (2015) What causes the local fiscal crisis in China: The role of intermediaries. Journal of Contemporary China24(94): 573–93.
17.
LiWeibingYangYongwen (2021) Can environmental centralization help reduce pollution? Evidence from an administrative reform in China. Journal of Cleaner Production314. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127972, accessed 11 May 2023.
中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅关于转发《财政部 国家发展计划委员会等关于加强公安 检察院 法院和工商行政管理部门行政性收费和罚没收入‘收支两条线’管理工作的规定》的通知 (Notice of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council on forwarding the ‘Provisions by the Ministry of Finance and the State Development Planning Commission and others on strengthening the “two-channel management” of the receipts and disbursements of administrative charges, fines and confiscation income for public security departments, judicial departments, and administrative departments for industry and commerce’) (n.d.) https://www.shui5.cn/article/eb/151125.html, accessed 3 August 2022.
21.
中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅关于印发《政法机关不再从事经商活动的实施方案》的通知 (Notice of the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council on issuing the ‘Implementation plan for prohibiting political-legal units from engaging businesses activities’) (n.d.) https://www.pkulaw.com/chl/d14b13c30986f1a1bdfb.html, accessed 3 August 2022.
22.
Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit, East Asia Pacific Region (2002) China: National development and sub-national finance: Review of provincial expenditures. Report no. 22951. Washington, DC: World Bank.
PutsJosBerlingMerel (eds) (2014) The Financing System of the Netherlands Judiciary. The Hague: Council for the Judiciary, the Netherlands.
25.
Research Group of the ‘Project on Reform of Fiscal Responsibilities and Expenditure Responsibilities in China’s Court System’ ‘我国审判领域财政事权与支出责任划分改革研究’课题组 (2021) 我国审判领域财政事权与支出责任划分改革研究 (Research project on reform of fiscal responsibilities and expenditure responsibilities in China’s court system). 财政研究 (Public finance research), no. 5: 3–16.
26.
Research Project Group of Hubei Province Higher People’s Court 湖北省高级人民法院课题组 (2009) 改革与完善人民法院经费保障体制的调研报告 (Investigative report on reforming and improving the funding guarantee system of people’s courts). 人民司法 (People’s judicature), no. 9: 65–70.
RosselliAlexander (2020) Judicial independence and the budget: A taxonomy of judicial budgeting mechanisms. Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design5, Article 2. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd/vol5/iss1/2, accessed 11 May 2023.
29.
TangHumei 唐虎梅 (2018) 省以下法院财物统管改革的现状与展望 (Status and prospects of [the court finance centralization] reform for sub-provincial courts). 法律适用 (Journal of law application), no. 21: 87–97.
30.
TangHumei 唐虎梅 (2019) 人民法院财务工作40年(之一) (40 years of financial work in people’s courts (part one)). 人民司法 (People’s judicature), no. 22: 24–32.
31.
TangHumei 唐虎梅 (2021) 人民法院经费保障面临的形势与对策研究 (Research on the status of and countermeasures in the funding guarantee system of people’s courts). 人民司法 (People’s judicature), no. 4: 59–66.
32.
TangHumei 唐虎梅 and GuoFeng 郭丰 (2010) 2009 年度全国法院经费分析报告 (Analytical report on the national court funding in 2009). 人民司法 (People’s judicature), no. 17: 70–4.
33.
TangHumei 唐虎梅, GuoFeng 郭丰, and LiJun 李军 (2011) 全国法院经费保障体制改革情况调研报告 (Investigative report on reform of the funding guarantee system of courts in China). 人民司法 (People’s judicature), no. 17: 75–9.
34.
财政部,最高院在甘肃开展财物省级统管专项联合调研 (The Ministry of Finance and the Supreme People’s Court launched a joint investigation into [the court finance centralization] in Gansu Province) (2019) 17 October. http://www.chinagscourt.gov.cn/Wap/Show/43816, accessed 12 March 2023.
35.
WangYueduan (2021) ‘Detaching’ courts from local politics? Assessing the judicial centralization reforms in China. China Quarterly246: 545–64.
36.
WebberDavid (2007) Good budgeting, better justice: Modern budget practices for the judicial sector. Law and Development Working Paper no. 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.
37.
WongChristine P. W. (2000) Central-local relations revisited: The 1994 tax-sharing reform and public expenditure management in China.China Perspectives31: 52–63.
38.
XiJinping 习近平 (2020) 论坚持全面依法治国 (On adhering to law-based governance). Beijing: 中央文献出版社 (Central party literature press).
39.
XiaoYang 肖扬 (2003) 法院,法官与司法改革 (Courts, judges and judicial reform). 法学家 (The jurist), no. 1: 3–10.
40.
XuJun 徐隽 (2014) 司法体制改革 开弓没有回头箭(深阅读) (No turning back for the judicial reform (in-depth reading)). 人民日报 (People’s daily), 10 July, 4.
41.
XueJiangwu 薛江武 and ZhangYongling 张勇玲 (2001) 法院经费保障问题的分析与思考 – 江西法院经费保障情况调查报告 (Analysis and reflection on problems in court’s funding guarantee system: An investigative report on the funding guarantee system for courts in Jiangxi). 人民司法 (People’s judicature), no. 8: 37–40.
42.
YuXiaohong 于晓虹 (2017) ‘去地方化’与‘去行政化’的博弈与平衡 – 2014年以来法检人财物省级统管改革再审视 (The game and balance between ‘delocalization’ and ‘de-administration’ – Re-examination of the reform of the provincial-level centralized management of personnel and property since 2014). 中国法律评论 (Chinese law review), no. 5: 187–98.
