This article presents a conceptual framework with which to approach issues of child development. It is based on an ecological perspective of human development that em phasizes the interplay of social and biological systems in shaping the experience of the child. In this framework child development is understood as the creation and maintenance of "social maps" that reflect and shape the child's behavior, maturation, personality, and conceptual development. The concepts of social risk and opportunity are critical to this conception as a means of linking developmental issues with issues of social policy, violence, displacement, and poverty.
Albee G.Primary prevention and social problems. In: Gerbner G, Ross CJ, Zigler E, eds. Child abuse: an agenda for action. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980: 106-17.
2.
Belsky J.Infant day care: a cause for concern? Zero to Three. Bull Nat Center Clin Infant Programs, 1986: 6: 1
3.
Bronfenbrenner U.Ecology of the family as a context for human development research perspectives. Dev Psychol1986: 22: 6: 723-742.
4.
Bronfenbrenner U.The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.
5.
Bronfenbrenner U.Reality and research in the ecology of human development. Proc Am Phil Soc1975: 119, 439-469.
6.
Dunst C., Trivette C.Risk and opportunity factors influencing parent and child functioning . Paper presented at the ninth Annual Smoky mountain Winter Institute , Asheville, NC, March 1992.
7.
Daly M.The true meaning of "home". The Better Homes Foundation 1989 Annual Report , Boston, Mass., 1990.
8.
Elder GHChildren of the great depression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
Garbarino J.A note on television viewing. In: U. Bronfenbrenner U, Mahoney M, eds. Influences on human development . Chicago: Dryden Press, 1974.
11.
Garbarino J.Toward a sustainable society: an economic, social and environmental agenda for our children's future. Chicago: Noble Press, 1992c.
12.
Garbarino J. , et al. Children and families in the social environment. New York: Aldine, 1992a.
13.
Garbarino J. , Bronfenbrenner U. Foschung im Bereich El-tern-Kind-Beziehungen und ihr Zusammenhang mit der Socialpolitik: Wer braucht wen? (Research in parent-child relations and its relationship with social policy: who needs whom?. In: Scheewind K, Herrmann T, eds. Theorien, Methoden and Anwendung der psychologie elterlichen Erziehungsverhanltens . Stuttgart , Germany: Verlag Hans Huber, 1980 .
14.
Garbarino J. , Dubrow N., Kostelny K., Pardo C.Children in danger: coping with the consequences of community violence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992 b.
15.
Garbarino J., Guttmann E., Seeley J.The psychologically battered child. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1986.
16.
Garbarino J., Kostelny K., Dubrow N.No place to be a child: growing up in a war zone. New York : Lexington/MacMillan , 1991.
17.
Garbarino J., Stott F.Faculty of the Erikson Institute. What children can tell us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989 .
18.
Hardin G.Biology: its principles and implications. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman, 1966.
19.
Giarini O.Dialogue on wealth and welfare. New York: Pergamon Press, 1980.
20.
Pasamanick B.Social biology and aids. Division 37 Newsletter. Am Psychol Ass, 1987.
21.
Sameroff A. , Seifer R., Barocas R., Zax M., Greenspan S.Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year-old children: social-environmental risk factors . Pediatrics1987:79: 343-350.
22.
Terr L.Too scared to cry. New York: Harper Collins, 1990.
23.
Vygotsky LSThought and language. London: MIT Press, 1934.
24.
Whittaker J.Social support networks in child welfare. In Whittaker J, Garbarino J et al, eds. Social support networksNew York: Aldine, 1983: 167-87.
25.
Willerman L. , Broman SH, Fiedler M.Infant development, preschool IQ, and social class. Child Dev1970: 41: 69-77.
26.
Wilson E.On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
