Engaging with the lens of ‘children as been, being and becoming’, this paper analyses Chinese migrant children’s constructions of transnational childhood in Norway, particularly in family context. The study conducted semi-structured interviews with five Chinese families, including children aged 7–14 years old (N = 5) and their parents (N = 9). Findings reveal that Chinese migrant children actively produce meanings of childhood in the migration process, resisting, subverting, and embracing dominant childhood ideals in both Chinese and Norwegian societies. They integrate their past, current, and future experiences and aspirations, constructing (transnational) childhood ideals that matter to them and that are beyond adult-centric.
AbebeT (2019) Reconceptualising children’s agency as continuum and interdependence. Social Sciences8: 81.
2.
AbebeGHesselbergJ (2015) Community participation and inner-city slum renewal: relocated people’s perspectives on slum clearance and resettlement in Addis Ababa. Development in Practice25(4): 551–562.
3.
AlustizaMPachSYeungS, et al. (2025) Initial health assessments of children and young people seeking asylum and refugees in Europe: insights from a qualitative study of health care providers. European Journal of Pediatrics184(10): 612.
4.
BeazleyHBessellSEnnewJ, et al. (2009) The right to be properly researched: research with children in a messy, real world. Children's Geographies7(4): 365–378.
5.
BeckFNyíriP (2022) It’s all for the child’: the discontents of middle-class Chinese parenting and migration to Europe. The China Quarterly251: 913–934.
6.
Bradbury-JonesCTaylorJ (2015) Engaging with children as co-researchers: challenges, counter-challenges and solutions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology18(2): 161–173.
7.
Brekke StangelandELundetræKReikeråsE (2018) Gender differences in toddlers’ language and participation in language activities in Norwegian ECEC institutions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal26(3): 375–392.
8.
CarminatiL (2018) Generalizability in qualitative research: a tale of two traditions. Qualitative Health Research28(13): 2094–2101.
9.
ChanA (2017) Transnational parenting practices of Chinese immigrant families in New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood19(3): 219–230.
10.
ClarkA (2017) Listening to Young Children, Expanded Third Edition: A Guide to Understanding and Using the Mosaic Approach. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
11.
ClaytonCL (2011) British Chinese children: agency and action. The Journal of Early Adolescence33(2): 161–183.
12.
ClaytonCL (2014) ‘With my parents I can tell them anything’: intimacy levels within British Chinese families. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth19(1): 22–36.
13.
EnsorMO (2010) Understanding migrant children: conceptualizations, approaches, and issues. In: Children and Migration: At the Crossroads of Resiliency and Vulnerability. Springer, 15–35.
14.
GardnerAM (2011) Gulf migration and the family. Journal of Arabian Studies1(1): 3–25.
15.
GullestadM (1997) A passion for boundaries: reflections on connections between the everyday lives of children and discourses on the nation in contemporary Norway. Childhood4(1): 19–42.
16.
HanX (2024) Chinese children’s perspectives of long-distance familyhood via WeChat. Journal of Children and Media18(2): 254–271.
17.
HansonK (2017) Embracing the past: ‘been’, ‘being’ and ‘becoming’ children. Chilhood24(3): 281–285.
18.
Herrero-AriasRLeeEHollekimR (2020) ‘The more you go to the mountains, the better parent you are’: migrant parents in Norway navigating risk discourses in professional advice on family leisure and outdoor play. Health, Risk & Society22(7–8): 403–420.
19.
HuangJProchnerL (2003) Chinese parenting styles and children's self-regulated learning. Journal of Research in Childhood Education18(3): 227–238.
20.
HwangKK (2012) Face and morality in Confucian society. In: HwangKK (ed) Foundations of Chinese Psychology: Confucian Social Relations. Springer, 265–295.
21.
IvanhoePJ (2004) Filial piety as a virtue. In: Filial Piety in Chinese Thought and History. Routledge, 189–202.
22.
JamesAProutA (2015) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. Routledge.
23.
JensenAMKjørholtATQvortrupJ, et al. (2004) Childhood and generation in Norway: money, time and space. In: Children’s Welfare in Ageing Europe. Norwegian Centre for Child Research (NOSEB), 333–400.
24.
JiaRLiH (2017) The value of elite education in China. 21st Century China Center Research Paper No. 2017-07.
25.
JorgensenN (2025) Children of Migrants in the UK. University of Oxford.
26.
KjørholtAT (2008) Children as new citizens: in the best interests of the child? In: European Childhoods. Springer, 14–37.
27.
KönigASchwittekJJendrzeyK (2024) ‘Good childhood’: children’s perception and evaluation of transnational families. Frontiers in Sociology9: 1470541.
28.
KwakK (2003) Adolescents and their parents: a review of intergenerational family relations for immigrant and non-immigrant families. Human Development46(2–3): 115–136.
29.
Lamas-AbrairaL (2022) Chinese Transnational Families. Taylor & Francis.
30.
LiuCXuY (2023) When the UNCRC meets Confucianism: Chinese parents’ understanding of children’s right to play. Childhood30(2): 177–193.
31.
LiuYYangY (2022) New ‘useless education theory’: highly educated parents’ expectations for their children’s education—evidence from the one-child policy. China Economic Review72: 101764.
32.
LuHJChangL (2013) Parenting and socialization of only children in urban China: an example of authoritative parenting. The Journal of Genetic Psychology174(3): 335–343.
33.
LuoX (2022) Producing British education by Chinese parents: fulfilling parenting responsibilities in WeChat. British Educational Research Journal48(3): 556–577.
34.
MalcaKPAungWSoeTA (2025) Technology and Children on the Move or Affected by Crisis: Uses, Risks and Protection Measures. ECPAT International.
35.
MartinSHorganDO’RiordanJ, et al. (2024) Refugee and migrant children’s views of integration and belonging in school in Ireland – and the role of micro- and meso-level interactions. International Journal of Inclusive Education28(13): 3214–3233.
36.
MattelinESöderlindNKorhonenL (2024) ‘You cannot just stop life for just that’: a qualitative study on children’s experiences on refugee journey to Sweden. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry33(9): 3133–3143.
37.
Ní LaoireC (2016) Making space for ambiguity: the value of multiple and participatory methods in researching diasporic youth identities. Identities23(4): 470–484.
38.
NilsenRD (2008) Children in nature: cultural ideas and social practices in Norway. In: JamesAJamesAL (eds) European Childhoods. Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (2017) Framework Plan for Kindergartens. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training.
40.
NylundA (2020) Children’s right to participate in decision-making in Norway: paternalism and autonomy. In: Children’s Constitutional Rights in the Nordic Countries. Brill Nijhoff, 201–224.
41.
OliveiraGBeckerML (2025) Transnational childhoods: Brazilian Im/migrant children’s (in)visibility across the classroom. Journal of Latinos and Education24(4): 900–913.
42.
OrellanaMFThorneBCheeA, et al. (2001) Transnational childhoods: the participation of children in processes of family migration. Social Problems48(4): 572–591.
43.
PICUM (2024) Children’s rights in the 2024 migration and asylum pact.
44.
PunchS (2002) Research with children: the same or different from research with adults?Childhood9(3): 321–341.
45.
SchwittekJKönigADucuV (2025) Living apart together: growing up in transnational families. Families, Relationships and Societies14(1): 2–7.
TahaSAAnabtawiM (2024) Unheard voices: the living reality of unaccompanied refugee children in Jordan. Child Abuse & Neglect147: 106531.
48.
Telegdi-CsetriÁDucuVHărăguşM (2025) Voices, imaginaries and agency of Ukrainian and Moldovan transnational children. Families, Relationships and Societies14(1): 26–43.
49.
TerryGHayfieldNClarkeV, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis. In: WilligCStainton RogersW (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2nd edition. Sage, 17–37.
50.
TuM (2019) The transnational one-child generation: family relationships and overseas aspiration between China and the UK. Children’s Geographies17(5): 565–577.
51.
UprichardE (2008) Children as ‘being and becomings’: children, childhood and temporality. Children & Society22(4): 303–313.
52.
UrsinMLysåIM (2024) ‘Not everyone can become a rocket scientist’: decolonising children’s rights in ethnic minority childhoods in Norway. Social Sciences13(2): 117.
53.
WagnerJTEinarsdottirJ (2008) The good childhood: Nordic ideals and educational practice. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal47: 265–269.
54.
WangQLeichtmanMDWhiteSH (1998) Childhood memory and self-description in young Chinese adults: the impact of growing up an only child. Cognition69(1): 73–103.
55.
WynessM (2013) Children’s participation and intergenerational dialogue: bringing adults back into the analysis. Childhood20(4): 429–442.
56.
XuJ (2017) The Good Child: Moral Development in a Chinese Preschool. Stanford University Press.
