Parental involvement in research where children are the primary study participants is frequent but under-analyzed. To understand such dynamics in research with children, we examined children’s (ages 8–14) interactions with parents who came in and out of view during our virtual interviews in our study, Photographing Health by Rural Adolescents in the MidwEst (PHRAME). We identified the pull and push of this adult involvement—a choreography in which children were active participants. Our analysis demonstrates that such interactions provide important data about how children navigated power dynamics, and also offer integral insights on how they were doing health and care.
BhopalKBrannenJHeptinstallE (2000) Connecting Children: Care and Family Life in Later Childhood. London: Routledge.
4.
CheneyKE (2011) Children as ethnographers: Reflections on the importance of participatory research in assessing orphans’ needs. Childhood18(2): 166–179.
5.
ClarkCD (2011) In a Younger Voice: Doing Child-Centered Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
CorsaroWA (2017) The Sociology of Childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
7.
CoyneI (2010) Research with children and young people: The issue of parental (proxy) consent. Children & Society24(3): 227–237.
8.
DahlbergGMossPPenceA (2013) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Languages of Evaluation. London: Routledge.
9.
DrewSEDuncanRESawyerSM (2010) Visual storytelling: A beneficial but challenging method for health research with young people. Qualitative Health Research20(12): 1677–1688.
10.
EldénS (2013) Inviting the messy: Drawing methods and ‘children’s voices. Childhood20(1): 66–81.
11.
EsserF (2016) Neither “Thick” Nor “Thin”: Reconceptualising agency and childhood. In: EsserFBaaderMSBetzT, et al. (eds) Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood: New Perspectives in Childhood Studies. New York; London: Taylor & Francis, 48–61.
12.
Fargas-MaletMMcSherryDLarkinE, et al. (2010) Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research8(2): 175–192.
GardnerHRandallD (2012) The effects of the presence or absence of parents on interviews with children. Nurse Researcher19(2): 6–10.
15.
GreeneSHoganD (2004) Researching Children′ S Experience: Approaches and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
HillCEThompsonBJWilliamsEN (1997) A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist25(4): 517–572.
17.
HunlethJ (2011) Beyond on or with: Questioning power dynamics and knowledge production in ‘child-oriented’research methodology. Childhood18(1): 81–93.
18.
HunlethJ (2017) Children as Caregivers : The Global Fight against Tuberculosis and HIV in Zambia. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19.
HunlethJ (2019) Zambian children’s imaginal caring: on fantasy, play, and anticipation in an epidemic. Cultural Anthropology34(2).
20.
HunlethJMGalloRSteinmetzEK, et al. (2019) Complicating “the good result”: narratives of colorectal cancer screening when cancer is not found. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology37(4): 509–525.
21.
JamesA (2007) Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist109(2): 261–272.
22.
KayL (2019) Guardians of research: negotiating the strata of gatekeepers in research with vulnerable participants. Practice1(1): 37–52.
23.
LeonardM (2007) With a capital “G”. Representing Youth: Methodological Issues in Critical Youth Studies. New York: NYU, 133–156.
24.
LomaxH (2020) Multimodal Visual Methods for Seeing with Children. Seeing the World through Children’s Eyes. Leiden: Brill, 55–71.
25.
LuttrellW (2020) Children Framing Childhoods: Working-Class Kids’ Visions of Care. Bristol: Policy Press.
26.
MayallB (2000) The sociology of childhood in relation to children’s rights. The International Journal of Children's Rights8: 243–259.
27.
MazzeiLA (2009) An Impossibly Full Voice. In: JacksonAYMazzeiLA, (eds) Voice in Qualitative Inquiry: Challenging Conventional, Interpretive, and Critical Conceptions in Qualitative Research. London: Routeledge, pp. 45–62.
28.
PowellMASmithAB (2009) Children’s participation rights in research. Childhood16(1): 124–142.
29.
ProutA (2004) The Future of Childhood. London: Routledge.
30.
SprayJ (2021) Drawing perspectives together: What happens when researchers draw with children?Visual Anthropology Review37(2): 356–379.
31.
SpyrouS (2011) The limits of children’s voices: From authenticity to critical, reflexive representation. Childhood18(2): 151–165.
32.
SpyrouS (2017) Time to Decenter Childhood?London: Sage Publications Sage UK, pp. 433–437.
33.
SpyrouS (2019) An ontological turn for childhood studies?Children & Society33(4): 316–323.
TisdallEKMPunchS (2012) Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies10(3): 249–264.
36.
TurnerNAlmackK (2017) Recruiting young people to sensitive research: turning the ‘wheels within wheels. International Journal of Social Research Methodology20(5): 485–497.
37.
Von BenzonN (2015) ‘I fell out of a tree and broke my neck’: acknowledging fantasy in children's research contributions. Children’s Geographies13(3): 330–342.
38.
WangCC (2006) Youth participation in photovoice as a strategy for community change. Journal of Community Practice14(1–2): 147–161.
