This article examines children’s agency in their interactions with social workers during statutory encounters in a child protection context. It draws from a UK-wide ethnographic study. It finds that much of social workers’ responses to children’s agency in this context are best understood as a form of ‘containment’. In doing so, it offers an original and significant contribution to the theoretical understanding of children’s agency, as well as its application in social work practice.
BionW (1959) Attacks on linking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis40: 308–315.
2.
Bluebond-LangnerMKorbinJ (2007) Challenges and opportunities in the anthropology of childhoods: An introduction to “children, childhoods, and childhood studies”. American Anthropologist109(2): 241–246.
3.
BordonaroLPayneR (2012) Ambiguous agency: Critical perspectives on social interventions with children and youth in Africa. Children’s Geographies10(4): 365–372.
4.
BroadhurstKHallCWastellDet al. (2010) Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. The British Journal of Social Work40: 1046–1064.
5.
Bühler-NiederbergerDSchwittekJ (2014) Young children in Kyrgyzstan: Agency in tight hierarchical structures. Childhood21(4): 502–516.
6.
CollinsTM (2017) A child’s right to participate: Implications for international child protection. The International Journal of Human Rights21(1): 14–46.
7.
De CerteauM (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. London: University of California Press.
8.
EsserF (2016) Neither “thick” nor “thin”: Reconceptualising agency and childhood relationally. In: EsserFBaaderMSBetzTet al. (eds) Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood: New Perspectives in Childhood Studies. New York; London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 48–61.
9.
EsserFBaaderMSBetzTet al. (eds) (2016) Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood: New Perspectives in Childhood Studies. London: Routledge.
10.
FergusonH (2017) How children become invisible in child protection work: Findings from research into day-to-day social work practice. The British Journal of Social Work47(4): 1007–1023.
11.
ForresterDKershawSMossHet al. (2008) Communication skills in child protection: How do social workers talk to parents?Child & Family Social Work13: 41–51.
12.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
HallCSlembrouckS (2009) Communication with parents in child welfare: Skills, language and interaction. Child & Family Social Work14: 461–470.
14.
HansonK (2016) Children’s participation and agency when they don’t ‘do the right thing’. Childhood23(4): 471–475.
15.
HollandSRenoldERossNet al. (2008) The everyday lives of children in care: Using a sociological perspective to inform social work practice. In: LuckockBLefevreM (eds) Direct Work: Social Work with Children and Young People in Care. London: BAAF, pp. 77–94.
16.
HollowaySLHoltLMillsS (2018) Questions of agency: Capacity, subjectivity, spatiality and temporality. Progress in Human Geography. Epub ahead of print 8 April. DOI: 10.1177/0309132518757654.
17.
JamesA (2009) Agency. In: QvortrupJCorsaroWHonigMS (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 34–45.
18.
JamesAProutA (1990) Constructing and Deconstructing Childhood. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
19.
KarlssonS (2018) ‘Do you know what we do when we want to play?’ Children’s hidden politics of resistance and struggle for play in a Swedish asylum centre. Childhood25(3): 311–324.
20.
KlockerN (2007) An example of thin agency: Child domestic workers. In: PanelliSPunchSRobsonE (eds) Global Perspectives on Rural Childhood and Youth: Young Rural Lives. London: Routledge, pp. 81–148.
21.
LangevangTGoughKV (2009) Surviving through movement: The mobility of urban youth in Ghana. Social & Cultural Geography10(7): 741–756.
22.
MarshallK (1997) Children’s Rights in the Balance: The Participation-Protection Debate. London: The Stationery Office.
23.
MunroE (2011) The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report, a Child-Centred System, vol. 8062. London: The Stationery Office.
24.
PunchS (2002) Research with children: The same or different from research with adults?Childhood9(3): 321–341.
25.
RuchG (2007) Reflective practice in contemporary child-care social work: The role of containment. The British Journal of Social Work37(4): 659–680.
26.
RuchG (2014) ‘Helping children is a human process’: Researching the challenges social workers face in communicating with children. The British Journal of Social Work44(8): 2145–2162.
27.
TisdallEKM (2017) Conceptualising children and young people’s participation: Examining vulnerability, social accountability and co-production. The International Journal of Human Rights21(1): 59–75.
28.
TisdallEKMPunchS (2012) Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies10(3): 249–264.
29.
TuliMChaudharyN (2010) Elective interdependence: Understanding individual agency and interpersonal relationships in Indian families. Culture & Psychology16(4): 477–496.
30.
WinterK (2006) Widening our knowledge concerning young looked after children: The case for research using sociological models of childhood. Child & Family Social Work11(1): 55–64.
31.
WinterKCreeVHallettSet al. (2017) Exploring communication between social workers, children and young people. The British Journal of Social Work47(5): 1427–1444.
32.
WinterKMorrisonFCreeVet al. (2018) Emotional labour in social workers’ encounters with children and their families. The British Journal of Social Work. Epub ahead of print 19 April. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcy016.
