Causal accounts are a relatively neglected aspect of occupational discourse. Using the example of social work, it is argued that the metaphor of narrative drama may have led to a framework in which the inspection of causal texture is not central to the analytic task. Starting from the literature on accounts, we argue that a promisingly fruitful way of exploring issues of social work talk and causality is through ethnography. Preliminary directions are outlined towards an ethnography of causal accounting within professional discourse in social work, and we identify incidents and events that may be investigated as possible `triggers' for such accounting. Causal accounts are viewed in part as occupational `survival kits'. We speculate on possible implications of such an ethnography for thinking about social work practice and management.
Begelman, D.A.`Behavioural Classification' in M. Hersen and A.S. Bellack. 1970. Behavioural Assessment: A Practical Handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
2.
Bettmann, J.R. and Weitz, B.A.1983. `Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual Reports'. Administrative Science Quarterly28:165-183.
3.
Black, M.`More About Metaphor' in A. Ortony (ed.) 1979. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Blumstein, P.W.1974. `The Honouring of Accounts'. American Sociological Review39:551-561.
6.
Boyd, R.`Metaphor and Theory Change: What is “Metaphor” a Metaphor for?' in A. Ortony (ed.) 1979. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Brearley, P. 1982. Risk and Social Work. London: Routledge.
8.
Bunge, M. 1979. Causality and Modern Science. New York: Dover Publications.
9.
Chaffee, E.E.1985. `Three Models of Strategy'. Academy of Management Review10:89-98.
10.
Davies, M. 1977. Support Systems in Social Work. London: Routledge.
11.
Dean, R.G.1989. `Ways of Knowing in Clinical Practice'. Clinical Social Work17: 116-127.
12.
Draper, S.W.`What's Going on in Everyday Explanation?' in C. Antaki (ed.) 1988. Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods. London: Sage.
13.
Einhorn H.J. and Hogarth, R.M.1986. `Judging Probable Cause'. Psychological Bulletin99:3-19.
14.
Emery, F.E. and Trist, E.L.`The Causal Texture of Organisational Environments' in F.E. Emery (ed.) 1969. Systems Thinking. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
15.
England, H. 1986. Social Work as Art. London: Allen and Unwin.
16.
Farr, R.M.1977. `On the Nature of Attributional Artifacts in Qualitative Research'. Journal of Occupational Psychology50:3-14.
17.
Fischer, J. 1978. Effective Casework Practice: An Eclectic Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Freud, S. 1962. `Charcot' in Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 3. London: Hogarth Press.
19.
Furnham, A.F. 1988. Lay Theories: Everyday Understanding of Problems in the Social Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20.
Goldberg, E.M.1976. `Towards Accountability for Social Workers: A Case Review System for Social Workers'. British Journal of Social Work6:3-22.
21.
Hardiker, P.1977. `Social Work Ideologies in the Probation Service'. British Journal of Social Work7:131-154.
22.
Harré, R.J., Margolis, J., Deese, J. and Lamiell, J.T.1989. `Language and the Science of Psychology'. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality4:165-188.
23.
Harré, R.J.`Language Games and Texts of Identity' in J. Shotter and K.J. Gergen (eds.) 1989. Texts of Identity. London: Sage.
24.
Harré, R.J. and Secord, P.F. 1972. The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
25.
Hartmann, A.1970. `To Think About the Unthinkable'. Social Casework51:467-474.
26.
Howe, D. 1987. An Introduction to Social Work Theory. Aldershot: Wildwood House.
27.
Hughes, J. 1980. The Philosophy of Social Research. London: Longman.
28.
Iacobucci, C.1990. `Accounts, Formulations and Goal Attainment Strategies in Service Encounters'. Journal of Language and Social Psychology9:85-99.
29.
Jackson, C. 1968. Life in the Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
30.
Jones, M.1990. `Understanding Social Work: A Matter of Interpretation?'British Journal of Social Work20:181-196.
31.
Kuhn, T.S.`Metaphor in Science' in A. Ortony (ed.) 1979. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Lee, D.1950. `Lineal and Non-Lineal Codifications of Reality'. Psychosomatic Medicine12:89-97.
34.
Leonard, P.1971. `The Challenge of Primary Prevention'. Social Work Today2.5:2-4.
35.
Levi, P. 1987. If This is a Man. London: Sphere Books.
36.
Lortie, D.C. 1975. Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Lyman, S.M. and Scott, M.B. 1970. A Sociology of the Absurd. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
38.
Martin, J. and Harré, R.`Metaphor in Science' in D. Miall (ed.) 1982. Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives. Brighton: Harvester Press.
39.
Mayer, J. and Timms, N. 1970. The Client Speaks. London: Routledge.
40.
Mishler, E.G. 1984. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
41.
Mugadza, W. 1991. `Shona Culture and Its Influence on Solving Family Problems' unpublished.
42.
Mulkay, M.J. and Gilbert, G.N.1983. `Scientists' Theory Talk'. Canadian Journal of Sociology8:179-197.
43.
Nuckolls, C.W.1991. `Culture and Causal Thinking: Diagnosis and Prediction in a South Indian Fishing Village'. Ethos19:3-51.
44.
Paton, A. 1971. Too Late the Phalarope. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
45.
Philp, M.1979. `Notes on the Form of Knowledge in Social Work'. Sociological Review27:83-111.
46.
Pithouse, A. 1987. Social Work: The Social Organisation of an Invisible Trade. Aldershot: Gower.
47.
Pithouse, A. and Atkinson, P.`Telling the Case: Occupational Narrative in a Social Work Office' in N. Coupland (ed.) 1988. Styles of Discourse. London: Croom Helm.
48.
Pollner, M.1974. `Mundane Reasoning'. Philosophy of the Social Sciences4:35-54.
49.
Pollner, M. 1987. Mundane Reason. Cambridge: University Press.
50.
Pomerantz, A.1978. `Attributions of Responsibility: Blamings'. Sociology12:115-121.
51.
Pomerantz, A.1986. `Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims'. Human Studies9:219-229.
52.
Reynolds, P.1986. `Concepts of Childhood Drawn from the Ideas and Practice of Traditional Healers in Musami'. Zambezia13:1-10.
53.
Rojek, C., Peacock, G. and Collins, S. 1988. Social Work and Received Ideas. London: Routledge.
54.
Sainsbury, E. 1975. Social Work with Families. London: Routledge.
55.
Schon, D.A.`Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem Setting in Social Policy' in A. Ortony (ed.) 1979. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Selwyn, J.1991. `Applying to Adopt: the Experience of Rejection'. Adoption and Fostering15:26-29.
57.
Shaw, I.1984. `Consumer Evaluations of the Personal Social Services'. British Journal of Social Work14:277-284.
58.
Sheldon, B.1978. `Theory and Practice in Social Work: A Re-examination of a Tenuous Relationship'. British Journal of Social Work8:1-22.
59.
Simons, H.W. 1989. Rhetoric in the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
60.
Smith, D.E.1978. `K is Mentally Ill'. Sociology12:23-53.
61.
Smith, G. and Harris, R.1972. `Ideologies of Need and the Organisation of Social Work Departments'. British Journal of Social Work2:27-45.
62.
Stanley, L. (ed.) 1990. Feminist Praxis. London: Routledge.
63.
Swift, G. 1983. Waterland. London: Heinemann.
64.
Whan, M.1979. `Accounts, Narrative and Case History'. British Journal of Social Work9:489-499.
65.
Whittaker, J. 1974. Social Treatment: An Approach to Interpersonal Helping. Chicago: Aldine.
66.
Yearley, S.1988. `Settling Accounts: Action, Accounts and Sociological Explanation'. The British Journal of Sociology39:578-599.
