Child as family sponsor: An unforeseen effect of Programa Bolsa Família in northeastern Brazil

Abstract

This article is based on ethnographic fieldwork research conducted in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil and addresses the unexpected role the children came to fulfil in the household as a consequence of the Programa Bolsa Família, a conditional cash transfer programme. In its design, the programme was intended for families and had a clear focus on women, aiming at empowering them. However, the article shows how children became considered the main agents responsible for the family’s continued access to the benefit and as a consequence, how they came to bear the responsibility for the family’s financial survival.

Keywords

Agency children conditionalities family

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adato

(2008) Combining survey and ethnography methods to improve evaluation of conditional cash transfer programs. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 2(2): 222–236.

Adato

Roopnaraine

(2010) Women’s status, gender relations, and conditional cash transfers. In: Adato

Hoddinott

(eds) Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press/International Food Policy Research Institute, pp. 284–313.

Adato

. (2000) The Impact of Progresa on Women’s Status and Intrahousehold Relations. Final Report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

Behrman

Parker

(2010) Impacts of conditional cash transfer programs in education. In: Adato

Hoddinott

(eds) Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press/International Food Policy Research Institute, pp. 191–211.

Bradshaw

Víquez

(2008) Women beneficiaries or women bearing the cost? A gendered analysis of the Red de Protección Social in Nicaragua. Development and Change 39(5): 823–844.

CEDEPLAR (2007) Sumário Executivo. Avaliação de Impacto do Programa Bolsa Família. Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional – Cedeplar/UFMG. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome. Brasília: SAGI.

Corsaro

(1997) The Sociology of Childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

De Britto

(2008) The emergence and popularity of conditional cash transfers in Latin America. In: Barrientos

Hulme

(eds) Social Protection for the Poor and the Poorest: Concepts, Policies and Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181–193.

Dugger

(2004) To help poor be pupils, not wage earners, Brazil pay parents. The New York Times. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2004/01/03/world/to-help-poor-be-pupils-not-wage-earners-brazil-pays-parents.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm.

10.

Dumont

(1997) HOMO HIERARCHICUS: O Sistema das Castas e suas Implicações. São Paulo: Editora EDUSP.

11.

Escobar

De la Rocha

(2003) Evaluacion Cualitativa del Programa de Desarrollo Humano Oportunidades: Seguimiento de Impacto 2001–2001. Documento Final de Diagnostico Cualitativo de Hogares Semiurbanos. Serie documentos de investigacion 3. Mexico City: Secretaria de Desarrollo Social.

12.

Fiszbein

Schady

(2009) Conditional Cash Transfers Reducing Present and Future Poverty. World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.

13.

Fiszbein

Ringold

Srinivasan

(2011) Cash transfers, children and the crisis: Protecting current and future investments. Development Policy Review 29(5): 585–601.

14.

Fonseca

CLW

(2002) Caminhos da Adoção, 2nd edn. São Paulo: Cortez.

15.

Freyre

(2006) Casa Grande e Senzala. São Paulo: Editora Global.

16.

Glewwe

Kassouf

(2012) The impact of Bolsa Escola/Familia conditional cash transfer program on enrollment, dropout rates and grade promotion in Brazil. Journal of Development Economics 97(2): 505–517.

17.

Goldam

(2003) Os tambores dos mortos e os tambores dos vivos. Etnografia, antropologia e política em Ilhéus, Bahia. Revista de Antropologia 46(2): 445–476.

18.

Hall

(2008) Brazil’s Bolsa Família: A double-edged sword? Development and Change 39(5): 799–822.

19.

Hanlon

Barrientos

Hulme

(2010) Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South. Boulder, CO: Kumarian Press.

20.

Hartmann

(2011) Meaningful help for self-help. D+C Development and Cooperation International Journal 38(4): 162–163.

21.

Hartung

(2009) O impacto dos Programas de Transferência Condicional de Renda Sobre a Incidência de Mães Solteiras. In: Três Ensaios sobre Demográfia e Criminalidade. Tese. Rio de Janeiro: EPGE, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, pp. 76–110.

22.

Invernizzi

(2007) Children’s work as ‘participation’: Thoughts on ethnographic data in Lima and Algarve. In: Hungerland

Liebel

Milne

Wihstutz

(eds) Working to be Someone: Child Focused Research and Practice with Working Children. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 135–144.

23.

James

(2004) Constructing Childhood: Theory, Policy and Social Practice. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

24.

James

(2008) Key Concepts in Childhood Studies. London: Sage.

25.

James

Prout

(1997) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London: Falmer Press.

26.

James

Jenks

Prout

(1998) Theorizing Childhood. London: Polity Press.

27.

Lavinas

(2006) From means-test schemes to basic income in Brazil: Exceptionality and paradox. International Social Security Review 59(3): 103–125.

28.

Mayall

(2000) Conversations with children: Working with generational issues. In: James

Christensen

(eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. London and New York: Falmer Press, pp. 120–134.

29.

Medeiros

De Britto

Soares

(2007) Transferência de renda no Brasil. Novos Estudos – CEBRAP 79: 5–21.

30.

Miller

(2002) Teoria das Compras: O Que Orienta as Escolhas dos Consumidores. Rio de Janeiro: Nobel.

31.

Molyneux

(2006) Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional transfer programme. Social Policy and Administration 40(4): 425–449.

32.

O’Kane

(2008) The development of participatory techniques facilitating children’s view about decisions which affect them. In: Christensen

James

(eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, 2nd edn. London: Falmer Press, pp. 125–149.

33.

Pires

(2007) Ser adulta e pesquisar crianças: explorando possibilidades metodológicas na pesquisa antropológica. Revista de Antropologia (São Paulo) 50: 225–270.

34.

Pires

(2010) O que as crianças podem fazer pela antropologia. Horizontes Antropológicos (UFRGS. Impresso) 34: 137–157.

35.

Pires

(2012) Programa Bolsa Família and children food consumption. In: CYCY Informal Seminar, Sheffield, October 2012.

36.

Prout

(2005) The Future of Childhood. New York: Routledge Falmer.

37.

Punch

(2003) Childhoods in the majority world: Miniature adults or tribal children? Sociology 37(2): 277–295.

38.

Quijano

MAF

(2009) Social policy for poor rural people in Colombia: Reinforcing traditional gender roles and identities? Social Policy and Admistration 43(4): 397–408.

39.

Rego

(2008) Aspectos teóricos das políticas de cidadania: uma aproximação ao Bolsa Família. Lua Nova 73: 147–185.

40.

Santos

POS

Pires

(2010) Nós somos combinados: negociando o destino do benefício do Programa Bolsa Família no município de Catingueira- PB. In: XVIII Encontro de Iniciação Científica, 2010, João Pessoa.

41.

Schlemmer

(2007) Working children in Fez, Morocco: Relationship between knowledge and strategies for social and professional integration. In: Hungerland

Liebel

Milne

Wihstutz

(eds) Working to be Someone: Child Focused Research and Practice with Working Children. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 109–115.

42.

Skoufias

McClafferty

(2001) Is PROGRESA working? FCND Briefs 118, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

43.

Soares

Ribas

Osório

(2010) Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família. Latin American Research Review 45(2): 173–190.

44.

Soares

(2006) Distribuição de renda no Brasil de 1976 a 2004, com ênfase no período entre 2001 a 2004. Texto para discussão No. 1166. Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas Aplicadas (IPEA), Brasília.

45.

Suarez

Libardoni

(2007) O impacto do Programa Bolsa Família: mudanças e continuidades na condição social das mulheres. In: Vaitsman

Paes-Sousa

(eds) Avaliação de Políticas e Programas do MDS – Resultados, Vol. II: Bolsa Família e Assistência Social. Brasília: MDS.

46.

Suplicy

(2007) O direito de participar da riqueza da nação: do Programa Bolsa Família à Renda Básica de Cidadania. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 12(6): 1623–1628.

47.

Toren

(1999) Mind, Materiality and History: Explorations in Fijian Ethnography. London: Routledge.

48.

Zimmermann

(2006) Social programs from a human rights perspective: The case of the Lula administration’s Family Grant in Brazil. Sur, International Journal on Human Rights 3(4): 145–161.