This study examines social class differences in the gender segregation of children and pre-adolescents and draws upon data from two recent German studies. Based on longitudinal quantitative data from a representative children’s survey, the first analysis suggests that in comparison to children from upper-class families, lower-class children tend to remain longer in gender-heterogeneous peer groups, a major proportion of students continue to have opposite-sex friends and changes between same- and opposite-sex peers appear earlier. In two further sections, material from a reconstructive study of 10- to 12-year-old pre-adolescents is used to describe more in-depth reflections of children themselves on gender segregation as well as orientations that develop in same-sex peer groups in contrasting social classes.
Alt, C. ( 2004) ‘The DJI Panel Study on Childhood: How Do Children Grow up in Germany?’, in S. Hübner-Funk (ed.) Research in Progress: Selected Studies of the German Youth Institute, pp. 75-85. Munich: Juventa.
2.
Alt, C. (ed.) (2005a) Kinderleben - Aufwachsen zwischen Familie, Freunden und Institutionen. Bd. 1, Aufwachsen in Familien. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag .
3.
Alt, C. (ed.) (2005b) Kinderleben - Aufwachsen zwischen Familie, Freunden und Institutionen. Bd. 2, Aufwachsen zwischen Freunden und Institutionen. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
4.
Alt, C. (ed.) (2007) Kinderpanel - Start in die Grundschule. Bd. 3, Ergebnisse aus der zweiten Welle. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
5.
Attili G., P. Vermigli and B.H. Schneider ( 1997) ‘Peer Acceptance and Friendship Patterns among Italian Schoolchildren within a Cross-Cultural Perspective’, International Journal of Behavioral Development21(2): 277-88.
6.
Aydt, H. and W. Corsaro ( 2003) ‘Differences in Children’s Construction of Gender across Culture: An Interpretive Approach’, American Behavioral Scientist46(4): 1306-25.
7.
Betz, T., A. Lange and C. Alt ( 2007) ‘Das Kinderpanel als Beitrag zur Sozialberichterstattung über Kinder - Theoretisch-Konzeptionelle Rahmung sowie methodologische und methodische Implikationen’, in C. Alt (ed.) Kinderpanel - Start in die Grundschule. Bd. 3, Ergebnisse aus der zweiten Welle, pp. 19-59. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
8.
Bohnsack, R. ( 2003) Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung, 6th edn. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
9.
Bohnsack, R. ( 2009) ‘The Documentary Method: Exemplified by the Interpretation of Group Discussions’, in R. Bohnsack , N. Pfaff and W. Weller (eds) Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research: Results from a Brazilian- German Cooperation. Opladen and Farmington Hills, MI: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
10.
Bohnsack, R. and A.-M. Nohl ( 2003) ‘Youth Culture as Practical Innovation: Turkish German Youth, "Time Out" and the Actionisms of Breakdance’, European Journal of Cultural Studies (6)3: 367-86.
11.
Breidenstein, G. and H. Kelle ( 1998) Geschlechteralltag in der Schulklasse: ethnographische Studien zur Gleichaltrigenkultur. Weinheim: Juventa.
12.
Bryman, A. ( 1992) Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London and New York: Routledge .
13.
Chen, X., K.H. Rubin and Y. Sun ( 1992) ‘Social Reputation and Peer Relationships in Chinese and Canadian Children: A Cross-Cultural Study’, Child Development63(6): 1336-43.
14.
Corsaro, W.A. ( 1997) The Sociology of Childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
15.
Corsaro, W.A. and D. Eder ( 1990) ‘Children’s Peer Cultures’, Annual Review of Sociology16(1): 197-220.
16.
Durham, M.G. ( 1999) ‘Girls, Media, and the Negotiation of Sexuality: A Study of Race, Class, and Gender in Adolescent Peer Groups’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly76(2): 193-216.
17.
Eder, D., C.C. Evans and S. Parker ( 1995) School Talk: Gender and Adolescent Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
18.
Fielding, N.G. and J.L. Fielding ( 1986) Linking Data: Qualitative Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Flaake, K. ( 1990) ‘Geschlechterverhältnisse, geschlechtsspezifische Identität und Adoleszenz’, Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie10(1): 2-13.
20.
Goodwin, M.H. ( 1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
Goodwin, M.H. ( 1998) ‘Games of Stance: Conflict and Footing in Hopscotch’ , in S. Hoyle and C.T. Adger (eds) Kid’s Talk: Strategic Language Use in Later Childhood, pp. 23-46. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Goodwin, M.H. ( 2001) ‘Organizing Participation in Cross-Sex Jump Rope: Situating Gender Differences within Longitudinal Studies of Activities’ , Research on Language and Social Interaction (34)1: 75-106.
23.
Harkness, S. and C.M. Super ( 1985) ‘The Cultural Context of Gender Segregation in Children’s Peer Groups’, Child Development56(2): 219-24.
24.
Helfferich, C. ( 1994) Jugend, Körper und Geschlecht. Die Suche nach sexueller Identität. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
25.
Jacklin, C.N. and E.E. Maccoby ( 1978) ‘Social Behavior at 33 Months in Same-Sex and Mixed-Sex Dyads’, Child Development49(2): 557-69.
26.
Killen, M., D.S. Crystal and H. Watanabe ( 2002) ‘Japanese and American Children’s Evaluations of Peer Exclusion, Tolerance of Differences, and Prescriptions for Conformity’ , Child Development73(6): 1788-802.
27.
Kolip, P. ( 1997) Geschlecht und Gesundheit im Jugendalter. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
28.
Krüger, H.-H. and N. Pfaff ( 2008) ‘Peerbeziehungen und schulische Bildungsbiographien - Einleitung’, in H.-H. Krüger , S. Köhler, N. Pfaff and M. Zschach , Kinder und ihre Peer groups, pp. 11-33. Opladen and Farmington Hills, MI: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
29.
Krüger, H.-H., S. Köhler, N. Pfaff and M. Zschach ( 2008a) Kinder und ihre Peer groups. Opladen and Farmington Hills, MI: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
30.
Krüger, H.-H., S.-M. Köhler and M. Zschach ( 2008b) ‘Peer Groups and Selection Processes within the Educational System: Theoretical and Conceptual Framework and First Results’ , in H.-H. Krüger et al. (eds) Family, School, Youth Culture: Networked Spaces of Education and Social Inequality from the Perspective of Pupil Research, pp. 203-22. Frankfurt am Main and Berlin: Peter Lang .
31.
Kyratzis, A. and J. Guo ( 2001) ‘Preschool Girls’ and Boys’ Verbal Conflict Strategies in the US and in China: Cross-Cultural and Contextual Considerations’ , Research on Language and Speed Interaction4(1; Special Issue: ‘Gender Construction in Children’s Interaction: A Cultural Perspective’): 45-74.
32.
La Freniere, P., F.F. Strayer and R. Gauthier ( 1984) ‘The Emergence of Same-Sex Affiliative Preferences among Preschool Peers: A Developmental/Ethological Perspective’, Child Development55(5): 1958-65.
33.
Maccoby, E.E. ( 1998) The Two Sexes: Growing up Apart, Coming Together. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
34.
Maccoby, E.E. ( 1990) ‘Gender and Relationships: A Developmental Account’ , American Psychologist45(4): 513-20.
35.
Marsh, H.W., O. Köller and J. Baumert ( 2001) ‘Reunification of East and West German School Systems: Longitudinal Multilevel Modeling Study of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept’, American Educational Research Journal38(2): 321-50.
36.
Munroe, R. and A.K. Romney ( 2006): ‘Gender and Age Differences in Same-Sex Aggregation and Social Behavior: A Four-Culture Study’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology37(3): 3-19.
37.
Oswald, H. ( 1993) ‘Gruppenformationen von Kindern’, in M. Markefka and B. Nauk (eds) Handbuch der Kindheitsforschung, pp. 353-64. Berlin : Luchterhand.
38.
Pellegrin, A.D. ( 2004) ‘Sexual Segregation in Childhood: A Review of Evidence for Two Hypotheses’, Animal Behaviour68(1): 435-43.
39.
Pfaff, N., M. Zschach and C. Zitzke ( 2008) ‘Peergrouppraxen und Umgang mit Schule - eine Sache des Geschlechts?’, in H.-H. Krüger et al., Kinder und ihre Peer groups, pp. 201-18. Opladen and Farmington Hills, MI: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
40.
Pfaff, N., R. Bohnsack and W. Weller ( 2010) ‘Reconstructive Research and Documentary Method in Brazilian and German Educational Science - An Introduction’, in R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff and W. Weller (eds) Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research: Results from a Brazilian-German Cooperation, pp. 7-39. Opladen and Farmington Hills, MI: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
41.
Prenzel, M.,C. Artelt, J. Baumert, W. Blum, M. Hammann, E. Klieme and R. Peckrun (eds) (2007) PISA-Konsortium Deutschland: PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie, Zusammenfassung, at: pisa.ipn.uni-kiel.de/zusammenfassung_PISA2006.pdf
42.
Renold, Emma ( 2004) ‘ "Other" Boys: Negotiating Non-Hegemonic Masculinities in the Primary School’, Gender and Education16(2): 247-67.
43.
Renold, Emma ( 2005) Girls, Boys and Junior Sexualities: Exploring Children’s Gender and Sexual Relations in the Primary School. London : Routledge Falmer.
44.
Tervooren, A. ( 2006) Im Spielraum von Geschlecht und Begehren. Ethnographie der ausgehenden Kindheit. Munich and Weinheim: Juventa.
45.
Thorne, B. ( 1993) Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
46.
Thorne, B. and Z. Luria ( 1986) ‘Sexuality and Gender in Children’s Daily World’, Social Problems33(1): 176-89.
47.
Traub, A. ( 2005) ‘Ein Freund, ein guter Freund - die Gleichaltrigenbeziehungen der 8- bis 9-Jährigen’, in C. Alt (ed.) Kinderleben. Aufwachsen zwischen Familie, Freunden und Institutionen. Band 2: Aufwachsen zwischen Freunden und Institutionen , pp. 23-62. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
48.
Wasserman, G.A. and D.N. Stern ( 1978) ‘An Early Manifestation of Differential Behavior toward Children of the Same and Opposite Sex’, Journal of Genetic Psychology133(1): 129-37.
49.
Whiting, B.B. and C.P. Edwards ( 1988) Children of Different Worlds: The Formation of Social Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
Younniss, J. and J. Smollar ( 1998) Adolescents’ Interpersonal Relationships in Social Context. New York: Wiley.
51.
Zinnecker, J. and C. Strozda ( 1996) ‘Freundschaft und Clique. Das informelle Netzwerk der Gleichaltrigen’, in J. Zinnecker and R.K. Silbereisen (eds) Kindheit in Deutschland, pp. 81-99. Munich and Weinheim: Juventa.
