Beyond Exit: The Multilevel Dynamics of Partnership Termination

Abstract

The way partnerships come to an end may play a critical role in sustaining collaborative achievements and safeguarding trust among partners and stakeholders. Yet the dynamics and challenges of partnership termination, especially planned endings, remain underexplored. This study contributes to expanding theoretical knowledge of partnership life cycle management and uses the ending as a reference point to generate insights relevant to the final and earlier partnering stages, as well as broader partnership management. Based on an in-depth case study of a global nonprofit-public partnership, it develops an inductive process framework depicting the interplay of termination pressures, collaborative end-stage tensions, and response strategies. While shaped by specific contextual factors, this framework helps to reframe the termination stage as a complex, multilevel process rather than a straightforward box-ticking exercise, with important implications for thinking within and across partnership life cycles.

Keywords

collaboration collaborative dynamics cross-sector partnerships life cycle public health termination

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almog-Bar

Schmid

(2018). Cross-sector partnerships in human services: Insights and organizational dilemmas. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_suppl), 119S–138S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018771218

Austin

J. E.

Seitanidi

M. M.

(2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012454685

Babiak

Thibault

(2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008316054

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Seo

(2020). Using a design approach to create collaborative governance. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15613696433190

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Stone

M. M.

(2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Stone

M. M.

(2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432

Calò

Teasdale

Roy

M. J.

Bellazzecca

Mazzei

(2024). Exploring collaborative governance processes involving nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231155817

Cloutier

Langley

(2020). What makes a process theoretical contribution? Organization Theory, 1(1), 2631787720902473. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720902473

Cornforth

Hayes

J. P.

Vangen

(2015). Nonprofit–public collaborations: Understanding governance dynamics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(4), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014532836

10.

Crosby

B. C.

Bryson

J. M.

(2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003

11.

Foss

Intindola

M. L.

Martin

E. C.

Coșciug

(2025). Multi-level mapping of tension in cross-sector social partnerships: A Romanian response to Ukrainian refugees. VOLUNTAS, 36, 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-025-00771-x

12.

Gazley

(2014). Intersectoral collaboration and the motivation to collaborate: Toward an integrated theory. In Bingham

O’Leary

(Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 46–64). Routledge.

13.

Gazley

Guo

(2020). What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A systematic review of the literature. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21433

14.

Gioia

D. A.

Corley

K. G.

Hamilton

A. L.

(2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151

15.

Gray

(1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass.

16.

Gray

Purdy

(2018). Collaborating for our future: Multistakeholder partnerships for solving complex problems. Oxford University Press.

17.

Hung

Gazley

Guo

(2025). Antecedents of nonprofit collaboration: A meta-analysis. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 36(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21664

18.

Huxham

Vangen

(2004). Realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.006

19.

Imperial

M. T.

(2023). Life cycle dynamics and developmental processes in collaborative partnerships: Examples from four watersheds in the US. Environmental Management, 71(3), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01699-4

20.

Imperial

M. T.

Johnston

Pruett-Jones

Leong

Thomsen

(2016). Sustaining the useful life of network governance: Life cycles and developmental challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1249

21.

Klindt

M. P.

Baadsgaard

Jørgensen

(2024). Boundary spanning and partnership performance: Bringing the structural perspective into the game. Public Management Review, 26(10), 2776–2801. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2197914

22.

Langley

(1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248

23.

Lowndes

Skelcher

(1998). The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00103

24.

Marks

M. L.

Vansteenkiste

(2008). Preparing for organizational death: Proactive HR engagement in an organizational transition. Human Resource Management, 47(4), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20246

25.

O’Leary

Vij

(2012). Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012445780

26.

Pfisterer

Payandeh

(2014). Same but different. Scaling through partnership replication. The Partnerships Resource Centre (PrC). http://hdl.handle.net/1765/77296

27.

Prentice

C. R.

Imperial

M. T.

Brudney

J. L.

(2019). Conceptualizing the collaborative toolbox: A dimensional approach to collaboration. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(7), 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019849123

28.

Provan

K. G.

Kenis

(2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015

29.

Ran

(2024). Paradoxes in collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 26(10), 2728–2753. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2196290

30.

Saz-Carranza

Ospina

S. M.

(2011). The behavioral dimension of governing interorganizational goal-directed networks—Managing the unity-diversity tension. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 327–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq050

31.

Seitanidi

M. M.

Crane

(2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9743-y

32.

Seo

(2025). Hang in there: Capacity constraints and processes of sustaining collaboration over time. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 35(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaf003

33.

Stadtler

Karakulak

. (2020). Broker organizations to facilitate cross-sector collaboration: At the crossroad of strengthening and weakening effects. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13174

34.

Stouten

Rousseau

D. M.

De Cremer

(2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752–788. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0095

35.

Sutton

R. I.

(1987). The process of organizational death: Disbanding and reconnecting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 542–569. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392883

36.

Szulecki

Pattberg

Biermann

(2011). Explaining variation in the effectiveness of transnational energy partnerships. Governance, 24(4), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01544.x

37.

Takahashi

L. M.

Smutny

(2002). Collaborative windows and organizational governance: Exploring the formation and demise of social service partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002312001

38.

Thomson

A. M.

Perry

J. L.

(2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x

39.

Thorpe

Holt

(2008). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative management research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020109.n52

40.

Van de Ven

A. H.

Poole

M. S.

(1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329

41.

Vangen

(2017). Developing practice-oriented theory on collaboration: A paradox lens. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12683

42.

Vangen

Huxham

(2012). The tangled web: Unraveling the principle of common goals in collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 731–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur065

43.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.02 MB

0.00 MB