Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-4
Do U.S. Faith-Based Social Service Organizations Resist Collaboration? Examining the Role of Religiosity and Operational Capacity in Interorganizational Partnerships
Although nonprofit collaboration is commonplace, recent research suggests that faith-based organizations (FBOs) are less likely to collaborate than other nonprofits. This study builds on prior FBO, collaboration, and nonprofit capacity research to examine the influence of religiosity and operational capacity on FBOs’ within- and cross-sector partnerships. Findings from a survey with 197 FBOs across the United States reveal a complex picture of how religiosity and operational capacity influence FBO collaboration. More specifically, staff religiosity was positively related to cross-sector partnerships. Service religiosity (i.e., religious elements in staff–client interactions) was negatively associated with collaboration with government agencies. Results also indicated that FBOs with higher operational capacity had more partners in the nonprofit, business, and public sectors. These findings suggest that FBOs generally lack the operational capacity for collaboration and that service religiosity creates additional barriers to it. This article concludes with implications for research in FBOs, interorganizational collaboration, and nonprofit capacity.
AustinJ. E.SeitanidiM. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726–758.
3.
BenefielM.FryL. W.GeigleD. (2014). Spirituality and religion in the workplace: History, theory, and research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(3), 175–187.
4.
BielefeldW.ClevelandW. S. (2013a). Defining faith-based organizations and understanding them through research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 442–467.
5.
BielefeldW.ClevelandW. S. (2013b). Faith-based organizations as service providers and their relationship to government. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 468–494.
6.
BryanT. K. (2019). Toward a contingency model for the relationship between capacity and effectiveness in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(4), 885–897.
7.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl. 1), 44–55.
ChavesM.TsitsosW. (2001). Congregations and social services: What they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 660–683.
10.
ClerkinR. M.GrønbjergK. A. (2007). The capacities and challenges of faith-based human service organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 115–126.
11.
DespardM. R. (2017). Can nonprofit capacity be measured?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(3), 607–626.
12.
DohertyA.MisenerK.CuskellyG. (2014). Toward a multidimensional framework of capacity in community sports clubs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(Suppl. 2), 124S–142S.
13.
EbaughH. R.ChafetzJ. S.PipesP. F. (2006). Where’s the faith in faith-based organizations? Measures and correlates of religiosity in faith-based social service coalitions. Social Forces, 84(4), 2259–2272.
14.
EbaughH. R.ChafetzJ. S.PipesP. F. (2007). Collaborations with faith-based social service coalitions. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(2), 175–191.
15.
EbaughH. R.ChafetzJ. S.PipesP. F.DanielsM. (2003). Where’s the religion? Distinguishing faith-based from social service agencies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(3), 411–426.
16.
FergusonK. M.WuQ.Spruijt-MetzD.DyrnessG. (2007). Outcomes evaluation in faith-based social services: Are we evaluating faith accurately?Research on Social Work Practice, 17(2), 264–276.
17.
FlaniganS. T. (2009). Staff perceptions of the benefits of religion in health and human services nonprofits: Evidence from international development. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 32(2), 164–194.
18.
FuJ. S.CooperK. R. (2020). Interorganizational network portfolios of nonprofit organizations: Implications for collaboration management. Nonprofit Management & Leadership. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21438
19.
FuJ. S.CooperK. R.ShumateM. (2019). Use and affordances of ICTs in interorganizational collaboration: An exploratory study of ICTs in nonprofit partnerships. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(2), 219–237.
20.
FuJ. S.ShumateM. (2020). Developing and validating a capacity instrument for Chinese and U.S. NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(3), 631–652.
21.
GazleyB.BrudneyJ. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 389–415.
22.
GazleyB.GuoC. (2020). What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A systematic review of the literature. Nonprofit Management & Leadership. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21433
23.
GreenJ. C.ShermanA. L. (2002). Fruitful collaborations: A survey of government-funded faith-based programs in 15 states. Hudson Institute.
24.
HéliotY.GleibsI. H.CoyleA.RousseauD. M.RojonC. (2020). Religious identity in the workplace: A systematic review, research agenda, and practical implications. Human Resource Management, 59, 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21983
25.
HulaR.Jackson-ElmooreC.ReeseL. (2007). Mixing God’s work and the public business: A framework for the analysis of faith-based service delivery. Review of Policy Research, 24(1), 67–89.
26.
JeavonsT. H. (2004). Religious and faith-based organizations: Do we know one when we see one?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 140–145.
27.
KearnsK.ParkC.YankoskiL. (2005). Comparing faith-based and secular community service corporations in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(2), 206–231.
28.
KimM.PengS. (2018). The dilemma for small human service nonprofits: Engaging in collaborations with limited human resource capacity. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 29(1), 83–103.
29.
LindsayD. M. (2007). Faith in the halls of power: How evangelicals joined the American elite. Oxford University Press.
30.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. SAGE.
31.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata Press.
32.
MarsdenP. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 435–463.
33.
MinznerA.KlermanJ. A.MarkovitzC. E.FinkB. (2014). The impact of capacity-building programs on nonprofits: A random assignment evaluation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 547–569.
34.
NadesanM. H. (1999). The discourse of corporate spiritualism and evangelical capitalism. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 3–42.
35.
PoppJ. K.MilwardH. B.MacKeanG.CasebeerA.LindstromR. (2014). Interorganizational networks: A review to inform practice. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
36.
RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.). (1999). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Academic Press.
ShumateM.FuS.CooperK. R.IhmJ. (2016, January). Interorganizational network portfolios of nonprofit organizations. Best paper proceedings of the Academy of Management Meeting. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.225
39.
ShumateM.HsiehY. P.O’ConnorA. (2018). How nonprofits report their partnerships with businesses: Extending the symbiotic sustainability model. Business & Society, 57(7), 1337–1373.
40.
SiderR. J.UnruhH. R. (2004). Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 109–134.
41.
SimoG.BiesA. L. (2007). The role of nonprofits in disaster response: An expanded model of cross-sector collaboration. Public Administration Review, 67(Suppl. 1), 125–142.
42.
SinhaJ. W. (2012). Unintended consequence of the faith-based initiative: Organizational practices and religious identity within faith-based human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 563–583.
43.
StrittS. B. (2008). Estimating the value of the social services provided by faith-based organizations in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(4), 730–742.
44.
SuárezD. F. (2010). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 307–326.
WeberM. (2002). The Protestant ethic and the “spirit” of capitalism and other writings. Penguin.
47.
WuthnowR. (2009). Saving America? Faith-based services and the future of civil society. Princeton University Press. (Original work published 2004)
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
