COVID-19 lockdowns required charitable nonprofits to virtually engage donors during restrictions on in-person gatherings, yet limited research has examined how online events convey stewardship. This study aims to understand how virtual events impact donor perceptions and build theory related to dialogic stewardship. A U.S. nationwide survey (n = 408) was conducted in November 2022 to assess how charitable nonprofit donors perceived stewardship in online virtual events. Those donors who attended virtual events perceived identification and the dialogic stewardship elements of strategic recognition and engagement as stronger than those who did not attend virtual events. When mediated by identification, perceptions of strategic recognition and engagement influenced virtual event attendees to report higher future donation intentions to that nonprofit. Nonprofit practitioners may want to consider virtual galas or webinars and online one-on-one meetings as important ways to enact dialogic stewardship and build feelings of identification with their organization among donor audiences.
BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30040524
2.
CapizzoL. (2018). Reimagining dialogue in public relations: Bakhtin and open dialogue in the public sphere. Public Relations Review, 44(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.007
3.
ChapmanC. M.CaseyJ.ThottamA. K.FranceC. (2024). Interpersonal fundraising methods are associated with lower donation value over time. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640241248029
4.
ChapmanC. M.LouisW. R.MasserB. M.ThomasE. F. (2022). Charitable Triad Theory: How donors, beneficiaries, and fundraisers influence charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 39(9), 1826–1848. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21701
5.
ChellK.MortimerG.DangT.Russell-BennettR. (2024). Understanding contextual determinants of likely online advocacy by millennial donors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(2), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231165913
6.
ChoiS.KimH.ChungM.LeeS. Y. (2019). Online donation experiences, donation awareness, and intention of future donation among teenagers in South Korea. Journal of Social Service Research, 45(5), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2018.1487363
7.
DreznerN. D.HuehlsF. (2014). Fundraising and institutional advancement: Theory, practice, and new paradigms. Routledge.
8.
FullerR. P.RiceR. E. (2022). Nonprofit organization communication, crisis planning, and strategic responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 27(3), e1750. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1750
GugenishviliI.NyströmA. G. (2024). Virtual reality and charitable giving: The influence of space, presence, and attention. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00666-3
11.
HalvorsenC. J.LynchJ.BrownS.McTernanM. L. (2023). Approaches to charitable giving and perceptions of organizational effectiveness among midlevel donors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231196888
12.
HamptonD.WiepkingP.ChapmanC.McHughL. H.ArnesenD.CarriganC.YangY. (2024). Philanthropy during COVID-19: Learnings and recommendations for philanthropic organizations navigating crisis. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 29(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1814
13.
HarrisonV. S. (2023a). The communicative power of nonprofit actions and values: A pilot study of dialogic stewardship. Public Relations Review, 49(1), 102280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102280
14.
HarrisonV. S. (2023b). Why relationships fail: Donor insights on defining and understanding successes and failures in nonprofit stewardship. Journal of Public Relations Research, 35(4), 236–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2023.2198237
15.
HayesA. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
16.
HouJ.EasonC. C.ZhangC. (2014). The mediating role of identification with a nonprofit organization in the relationship between competition and charitable behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(6), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.6.1015
17.
KellyK. S. (1991). Fundraising and public relations: A critical analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
KellyK. S. (1998). Effective fundraising management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334.
21.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37.
22.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (2021). Fostering dialogic engagement: Toward an architecture of social media for social change. Social Media+ Society, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630512098446
23.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
24.
KonstantinouI.JonesK. (2022). Investigating Gen Z attitudes to charitable giving and donation behaviour: Social media, peers and authenticity. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 27(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1764
LeeF. S.VogelD.LimayemM. (2003). Virtual community informatics: A review and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 5(1), 47–61.
27.
LiP.MenL. R.YueC. A. (2020). An exploratory study of stewardship for Chinese nonprofit organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 25(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1655
28.
MackC. E.KellyK. S.WilsonC. (2016). Finding an academic home for fundraising: A multidisciplinary study of scholars’ perspectives. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 21(3), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1554
29.
MaddenS.HarrisonV.VafeiadisM. (2023). Relational care in communication as the basis of nonprofit fundraising: Theorizing professional ethics based in stewardship and ethics of care. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 8(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1762
30.
MaelF.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.
31.
MaherC. S.HoangT.HinderyA. (2020). Fiscal responses to COVID-19: Evidence from local governments and nonprofits. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 644–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13238
32.
MartinB.SchlerethC. (2024). When a crisis has a silver lining: Social media p2p fundraising at the start of COVID-19. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(5), 1329–1342. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231213098
33.
MartinganoA. J.KonrathS.HenritzeE.BrownA. D. (2023). The limited benefits of using virtual reality 360 videos to promote empathy and charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(5), 1434–1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221125804
34.
MenL. R.TsaiW.-H. S. (2013). Toward an integrated model of public engagement on corporate social networking sites: Antecedents, the process, and relational outcomes. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(4), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.822373
35.
MillánÁ.RetamosaM.CarranzaR. (2024). What about NPOs? Identifying factors in the intention to donate: The role of brand identification and past behavior. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 35(2), 253–265.
36.
MorehouseJ.SafferA. J. (2023). Putting stakeholders’ engagement in the equation: Proposing the integrated network engagement model. Public Relations Review, 49(1), 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102291
37.
NewbyK.BranyonB. (2021). Pivoting services: Resilience in the face of disruptions in nonprofit organizations caused by COVID-19. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 7(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.7.3.443–460
38.
OlinskiM.SzamrowskiP. (2020). Using websites to cultivate online relationships: The application of the stewardship concept in public benefit organizations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 34(2), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798853
PatelS. J.McKeeverB. W. (2014). Health nonprofits online: The use of frames and stewardship strategies to increase stakeholder involvement. International Journal of Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19, 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1507
41.
PressgroveG. (2017). Development of a scale to measure perceptions of stewardship strategies for nonprofit organizations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990166440221
42.
PressgroveG.BowmanN. D. (2021). From immersion to intention? Exploring advances in prosocial storytelling. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 26(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1689
Qualtrics. (n.d.) Everything you need to know when working with your IRB.
45.
RaeymaeckersP.Van PuyveldeS. (2021). Nonprofit advocacy coalitions in times of COVID-19: Brokerage, crowdfunding, and advocacy roles. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(6), 1304–1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764021991675
SantosM. R.LaureanoR. M. (2022). COVID-19-related studies of nonprofit management: A critical review and research agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(5), 936–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00432-9
48.
SargeantA. (2001). Using donor lifetime value to inform fundraising strategy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(1), 25–38.
SaxtonG. D.WangL. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485159
51.
TrautweinS.LiberatoreF.LindenmeierJ.von SchnurbeinG. (2020). Satisfaction with informal volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis: An empirical study considering a Swiss online volunteering platform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020964595
52.
VafeiadisM.HarrisonV.DiddiP.DardisF.BuckleyC. (2021). Examining the impact of CSR partnerships on nonprofits (NPOs): The mediating effect of NPO social-objectives achievement and consumer-brand identification (CBI). International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.1945610
53.
VargoD.ZhuL.BenwellB.YanZ. (2021). Digital technology use during COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.242
54.
WatersR. D. (2011). Increasing fundraising efficiency through evaluation: Applying communication theory to the nonprofit organization-donor relationship. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 458–475.
55.
WatersR. D.FeneleyK. L. (2013). Virtual stewardship in the age of new media: Have nonprofit organizations moved beyond Web 1.0 strategies?International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(3), 216–230.
56.
WatersR. D.JamalJ. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.002
57.
WeberlingB. (2012). Framing breast cancer: Building an agenda through online advocacy and fundraising. Public Relations Review, 38, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.009
58.
WeberlingB.WatersR. D. (2012). Gauging the public’s preparedness for mobile public relations: The “Text for Haiti” campaign. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.005
59.
WiencierzC.PӧppelK. G.RӧttgerU. (2015). Where does my money go? How online comments on a donation campaign influence the perceived trustworthiness of a nonprofit organization. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2015.1008634
60.
WorleyD. A.LittleJ. K. (2002). The critical role of stewardship in fund raising: The Coaches vs. Cancer campaign. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 99–112.
61.
WymerW.AkbarM. M. (2019). Brand authenticity’s influence on charity support intentions. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 31(5), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1526754
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
