There has been a growing interest in the literature about the recognition of volunteers as a means to support volunteer retention. Using a contingent approach, this study highlights the variability in the interest of volunteers in two types of recognition: skill-based rewards and awards. French volunteers were surveyed through community-engaged research: 2,679 questionnaire responses were obtained and lead to a profile of volunteers who are interested in different skill-based rewards and awards. The notion of volunteer experience is thus discussed and this calls for personalization and for a deliberative approach to rewards and awards decisions. Practical recommendations aimed at public policymakers (e.g., empowering public policies on volunteer recognition), federations and networks supporting nonprofit organizations (NPOs; e.g., centralizing links with stakeholders implementing rewards and awards), and NPOs themselves to help manage recognition needs (e.g., meeting the needs of younger generations) are also formulated.
AinsworthJ. (2020). Feelings of ownership and volunteering: Examining psychological ownership as a volunteering motivation for nonprofit service organisations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101931.
AkingbolaK. (2013b). Contingency, fit and flexibility of HRM in nonprofit organizations. Employee Relations, 35(5), 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2012-0009
4.
AnheierH. K. (2023). Comparative research on nonprofit organizations and sectors: Looking back and looking forward. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 34(6), 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5
5.
ArchambaultE.PrillerE.ZimmerA. (2014). European Civil Societies compared: Typically German–typically French?VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 514–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9349-6
6.
ArnonL.Almog-BarM.CnaanR. A. (2023). Volunteer engageability: A conceptual framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(6), 1633–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221132499
7.
BazinC.BonneauP.DreyerP.DouetG.DurosM.LinC.LoviconiP.MaletJ.PersozI.SueR.VaureE. (2024). La France bénévole en 2024 [Volunteering in France in 2024]. Recherches & Solidarités.
BradshawP. (2009). A contingency approach to nonprofit governance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.241
10.
BrudneyJ. L.MeijsL. C. P. M. (2014). Models of volunteer management: Professional volunteer program management in social work. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 38(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2014.899281
11.
BrudneyJ. L.SinkH. K. (2017). Volunteer management: It all depends. In WordJ.SowaJ. E. (Eds.), The nonprofit human resource management handbook (pp. 114–122). Routledge.
12.
CameronS. (2021). Civic engagement in times of economic crisis: A cross-national comparative study of voluntary association membership. European Political Science Review, 13(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773921000060
13.
ChoiD.FerrisA.MarreseT.CnaanR.HandyF. (2024). The implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on recruitment and retention of volunteers and donors in the U.S. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 48(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2023.2232844
14.
ClaryE. G.SnyderM.RidgeR. D.CopelandJ.StukasA. A.HaugenJ.MieneP. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1516
15.
CnaanR. A.CascioT. A. (1999). Performance and commitment: Issues in management of volunteers in human service organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 24(3–4), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v24n03_01
16.
CnaanR. A.Goldberg-GlenR. S. (1991). Measuring motivation to volunteer in human services. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391273003
17.
CnaanR. A.UneticP. E.ChoiD. (2025). In-person volunteering in the times of the pandemic: Lessons for organizations dependent on essential volunteering. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 35(4), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21654
18.
CravensJ. (2000). Virtual volunteering: Online volunteers providing assistance to human service agencies. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 17(2–3), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1300/J017v17n02_02
19.
De La GarzaC.LotN. (2022). The socio-organizational and human dynamics of resilience in a hospital: The case of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 30(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12419
20.
DemirF. O.KireçciA. N.Yavuz GörkemŞ. (2020). Deepening knowledge on volunteers using a marketing perspective: Segmenting Turkish volunteers according to their motivations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(4), 707–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019892623
21.
EdeigbaJ.SinghD. (2022). Nonfinancial resource management: A qualitative study of retention and engagement in not-for-profit community fund management organisation. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.005
22.
EnglertB.ThalerJ.HelmigB. (2020). Fit themes in volunteering: How do volunteers perceive person–environment fit?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019872005
23.
EnglishJ. F. (2005). The economy of prestige: Prizes, awards, and the circulation of cultural value. Harvard University Press.
24.
FiorilloD. (2011). Do monetary rewards crowd out the intrinsic motivation of volunteers? Some empirical evidence for Italian volunteers. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82(2), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00434.x
25.
FreyB. S.GallusJ. (2017). Towards an economics of awards. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(1), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12127
26.
FreyB. S.GallusJ. (2018). Volunteer organizations: Motivating with awards. In RanyardR. (Ed.), Economic psychology (pp. 273–286). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118926352.ch17
27.
GallusJ. (2017). Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Science, 63(12), 3999–4015. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2540
28.
GarnerJ. T.GarnerL. T. (2011). Volunteering an opinion: Organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010366181
29.
Gil-LacruzA. I.MarcuelloC.Saz-GilM. I. (2019). Gender differences in European volunteer rates. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2018.1441016
30.
GrayD.RandellJ.ManningR.ClevelandM. (2024). Helping in times of crisis: Examining the social identity and wellbeing impacts of volunteering during COVID-19. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), Article e2699. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2699
31.
GuoC.MetelskyB. A.BradshawP. (2013). Out of the shadows: Nonprofit governance research from democratic and critical perspectives. In CornforthC.BrownW. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 63–84). Routledge.
32.
HagerM. A.BrudneyJ. L. (2015). In search of strategy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21123
33.
HallM. H.AndrukowA.BarrC.BrockK.de WitM.EmbuldeniyaD. (2003). The capacity to serve: A qualitative study of the challenges facing Canada’s nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
34.
HenningerM.RottlerM.HelmigB. (2024). Under pressure: Social information on reference groups and its influence on volunteering intention—A survey experiment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(2), 510–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231172209
35.
HopkinsB.DowellD. (2022). Recruitment and retention in not-for-profit organisations: Tailored strategies for younger and older volunteers. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(1), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2020-0450
36.
HustinxL. (2010). I quit, therefore I am?: Volunteer turnover and the politics of self-actualization. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008328183
37.
HydeM. K.DunnJ.BaxC.ChambersS. K. (2016). Episodic volunteering and retention: An integrated theoretical approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014558934
Koolen-MaasS. A.MeijsL. C. P. M.Van OverbeekeP. S. M.BrudneyJ. L. (2023). Rethinking volunteering as a natural resource: A conceptual typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 353S–377S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221127947
Mateiu-VescanR.IonescuT.OpreA. (2021). Reconsidering volunteering: Individual change as a result of doing good for others. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(6), 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00247-0
42.
McMullinC.RaggoP. (2020). Leadership and governance in times of crisis: A balancing act for nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1182–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020964582
43.
MeijsL. C. P. M.Ten HoornE. M. (2008). No one best volunteer administrator. In Liao-TrothM. (Ed.), Challenges in volunteer management (pp. 29–50). Information Age Publishing.
44.
Miller-StevensK.WardK. D. (2019). Nonprofit Board Members’ Reasons to Join and Continue Serving on a Volunteer Board of Directors. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 31(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1526734
45.
MitchellS.-L.ClarkM. (2020). Volunteer choice of nonprofit organisation: An integrated framework. European Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-05-2019-0427
46.
NesbitR.PaarlbergL. E.JoS. (2025). The decline of volunteering in the United States: Is it the economy?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 54(3), 583–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640241264264
47.
NowakowskaI.DudaE.EllenaA. M.Poli MartinelliD.SzulawskiM.PozziM. (2025). Challenges for formal organizations engaging volunteers during regular and crisis times according to polish and Italian volunteer coordinators. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 36(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00689-w
48.
OetzelJ. G.BoursawB.MagaratiM.DicksonE.Sanchez-YoungmanS.MoralesL.KastelicS.“Mickey” EderM.WallersteinN. (2022). Exploring theoretical mechanisms of community-engaged research: A multilevel cross-sectional national study of structural and relational practices in community-academic partnerships. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01663-y
49.
OostlanderJ.GüntertS. T.van SchieS.WehnerT. (2014). Leadership and volunteer motivation: A study using self-determination theory. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485158
50.
ParkS. M.WordJ. (2012). Driven to service: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for public and nonprofit managers. Public Personnel Management, 41(4), 705–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102601204100407
51.
PaullM. (2002). Reframing volunteer management: A view from the West. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 7(1), 21–27.
52.
PiatakJ. S.CarmanJ. G. (2023). Unpacking the volunteer experience: The influence of volunteer management on retention and promotion of the organization. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 9(3), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.9.3.1-19
PlaisanceG. (2017). L’engagement: Ni militant, ni syndical, ni partisan—Les nouvelles formes de volontariat [Commitment: Neither activist, unionist, nor partisan—New forms of volunteering. FYP editions.
55.
PlaisanceG. (2023a). Towards a relational governance of internal stakeholders in non-profit organisations (NPOs): When commitment is not enough. Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional, 27(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.7202/1098924ar
56.
PlaisanceG. (2023b). Which stakeholder matters: Overall performance and contingency in nonprofit organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 53(3), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2023.2237388
57.
PrinceW.PiatakJ. (2023). By the volunteer, for the volunteer: Volunteer perspectives of management across levels of satisfaction. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(5), 1191–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221127974
Rey GarcíaM.Álvarez GonzálezL. I.Bello AcebrónL. (2013). The untapped potential of marketing for evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations: A framework proposal. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-012-0085-1
60.
SchlesingerT.EgliB.NagelS. (2013). “Continue or terminate?” Determinants of long-term volunteering in sports clubs. European Sport Management Quarterly, 13(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2012.744766
StantonT. K. (2008). New times demand new scholarship: Opportunities and challenges for civic engagement at research universities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197907086716
64.
StirlingC.KilpatrickS.OrpinP. (2011). A psychological contract perspective to the link between non-profit organizations’ management practices and volunteer sustainability. Human Resource Development International, 14(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.585066
65.
StuderS. (2016). Volunteer management: Responding to the uniqueness of volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 688–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015597786
66.
StuderS.von SchnurbeinG. (2013). Organizational factors affecting volunteers: A literature review on volunteer coordination. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(2), 403–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9268-y
67.
ToeplerS.AnheierH. K. (2004). Organizational theory and nonprofit management: An overview. In ZimmerA.PrillerE. (Eds.), Future of civil society: Making central European nonprofit-organizations work (pp. 253–270). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80980-3_15
68.
Van IddekingeC. H.ArnoldJ. D.AguinisH.LangJ. W. B.LievensF. (2023). Work effort: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 49(1), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221087641
69.
VázquezJ.-L.LaneroA.GutiérrezP.GarcíaM.-P. (2015). Expressive and instrumental motivations explaining youth participation in non-profit voluntary associations: An application in Spain. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 12(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-015-0128-5
70.
WaeleL. D.BerghmanL.MatthyssensP. (2015). Defining hybridity and hybrid contingencies in public organizations: An alternative conceptual model. In HinnaA.GnanL.MonteduroF. (Eds.), Contingency, behavioural and evolutionary perspectives on public and nonprofit governance (Vol. 4, pp. 113–154). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020150000004005
71.
WalkM.ZhangR.LittlepageL. (2019). “Don’t you want to stay?” The impact of training and recognition as human resource practices on volunteer turnover. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(4), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21344
