Who Determines Where the Sun Shines: Nonprofit Sector Stakeholders and the IRS Form 990 Redesign

Abstract

Despite the importance of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 to exempt organizations’ regulation, management, and accountability, scholars and practitioners have overlooked how the form evolved over time. This study uses public comments, submitted during the most recent revision of the form in 2007, to examine who participated, stakeholder priorities, and how the updated form was shaped by the federal rulemaking process. The study finds that (a) the submitters of public comments provide a comprehensive view of the nonprofit sector’s diverse set of stakeholders and (b) the public comments highlight substantive self-identified priorities for the sector that can serve as a guide to future research. Key takeaways include the need to consider for-profit and trade association influence in nonprofit policy formation, to recognize selective transparency in reporting requirements, and to understand how stakeholder interests shape regulatory outcomes. Implications suggest researchers should fully leverage Form 990’s extensive changes while remaining cognizant of information gaps.

Keywords

IRS Form 990 rulemaking nonprofit governance nonprofit finance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson

A. J.

(2017). No taxation, no representation. In Boris

E. T.

Steuerle

C. E.

(Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 217–236). Urban Institute Press.

American Society of Association Executives. (2007, September 10). ASAE Comments on Draft Form 990. https://i.juniperkatz.com/f/Dwnak0

Austin

E. J.

(2000). The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. Jossey-Bass.

Berry

J. M.

Arons

D. F.

(2003). A voice for nonprofits. Brookings Institution Press.

Boeije

(2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391–409.

Campbell

J. L.

Quincy

Osserman

Pedersen

O. K.

(2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320.

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

Corbin

Strauss

(2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.

Crow

D. A.

Albright

E. A.

Koebele

(2020). Evaluating stakeholder participation and influence on state-level rulemaking. Policy Studies Journal, 48(4), 953–981.

10.

Ely

T. L.

Katz

Calabrese

T. D.

(2020). Starting from scratch: Building of meaningful endowments by public charities. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(3), 33–55.

11.

Furlong

S. R.

Kerwin

C. M.

(2005). Interest group participation in rule making: A decade of change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 353–370.

12.

Giventer

L. L.

(2008). Statistical analysis for public administration (2nd ed.). Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

13.

Golden

M. M.

(1998). Interest groups in the rule-making process: Who participates? Whose voices get heard? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 245–270.

14.

Grimmer

Stewart

B. M.

(2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297.

15.

Guo

Saxton

G. D.

(2010). Voice-in, voice-out: Constituent participation and nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 1, 0000102202215433481000.

16.

Harris

E. E.

Petrovits

C. M.

Yetman

M. H.

(2024). Spreading the news: Donor response to disclosures about nonprofit fraud. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(3), 638–665.

17.

Hilton

J. C.

(2016). Are gray skies clearing up? Shedding light on nonprofit governance in the wake of the revamped IRS form 990. North Carolina Law Review, 95(1), 235–259.

18.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

19.

Independent Sector. (2024, March 25). About us. https://independentsector.org/about/

20.

Internal Revenue Service. (2008, August 19). Background paper: Form 990, Moving from the old to the new. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/moving_from_old_to_new.pdf

21.

Internal Revenue Service. (2023, December 14). Instructions for form 990 return of organization exempt from income tax. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i990.pdf

22.

Internal Revenue Service. (2024, August 19). Form 990 schedules with instructions. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/form-990-schedules-with-instructions

23.

Keating

E. K.

Frumkin

(2003). Reengineering nonprofit financial accountability: Toward a more reliable foundation for regulation. Public Administration Review, 63(1), 3–15.

24.

Krippendorff

(2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.

25.

Lamothe

Ter-Mkrtchyan

Ruddle

T. B.

Kuyon

(2023). Examining the efficacy of accountability systems in preventing nonprofit misconduct: A look beyond financial fraud. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1), 106–129.

26.

Lombard

Snyder-Duch

Bracken

C. C.

(2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.

27.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M

. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.

28.

Mitchell

G. E.

Calabrese

T. D.

(2023). The hidden cost of trustworthiness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(2), 304–326.

29.

Smith

P. C.

Shaver

D. J.

(2009). Transparency, compliance, and filing burden—Principles for the revised Form 990. The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research, 7(1), 133–151.

30.

Thomas

D. R.

(2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

31.

Weible

C. M.

(Ed.). (2023). Theories of the policy process. Taylor & Francis.

32.

Worthing

S. L.

(1977). The Internal Revenue Service as a monitor of church institutions: The excessive entanglement problem. Fordham Law Review, 45(5), 929–948.

33.

Yackee

S. W.

(2006). Sweet-talking the fourth branch: The influence of interest group comments on federal agency rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 103–124.