Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-4
Disciplinary Contributions to Nonprofit Studies: A 20-Year Empirical Mapping of Journals Publishing Nonprofit Research and Journal Citations by Nonprofit Scholars
In celebration of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly’s 50th anniversary, we present a bibliometric analysis of nonprofit research published between 1999 and 2019, within and outside of three core nonprofit journals—NVSQ, NML, and Voluntas. We seek to understand which journals, across scientific domains and social science disciplines, inform nonprofit research in one of three ways, by (a) publishing articles, (b) citing the three core journals, or being cited in these core journals. We found that nonprofit research published in economics and social sciences journals has kept pace with a large increase in indexed research. Meanwhile, though the core nonprofit journals robustly cite and are increasingly cited by business and management and public administration journals, they are less engaged with other social science disciplines. We discuss ways that the core journals could increase their visibility and penetration into these other disciplines and highlight perspectives potentially missing from the core journals.
AllisonL.ChenX.FlaniganS. T.Keyes-WilliamsJ.VasavadaT. S.SaidelJ. R. (2007). Toward doctoral education in nonprofit and philanthropic studies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(Suppl. 4), 51S–63S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007305054
2.
ArchambaultE.BeauchesneO. H.CarusoJ. (2011). Towards a multilingual, comprehensive and open scientific journal ontology. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 66–77).
3.
AriaM.CuccurulloC. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
4.
BasuA. (2010). Does a country’s scientific ‘productivity’depend critically on the number of country journals indexed?Scientometrics, 82(3), 507–516.
5.
BrassJ. N.LonghoferW.RobinsonR. S.SchnableA. (2018). NGOs and international development: A review of thirty-five years of scholarship. World Development, 112, 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.016
6.
BrudneyJ. L.DurdenT. K. (1993). Twenty years of the journal of voluntary action research/nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly: An assessment of past trends and future directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764093223004
7.
BushouseB. K. (2017). Leveraging nonprofit and voluntary action research to inform public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12195
8.
BushouseB. K.SowaJ. E. (2012). Producing knowledge for practice: Assessing NVSQ 2000-2010. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011422116
CouleT. M.DodgeJ.EikenberryA. M. (2022). Toward a typology of critical nonprofit studies: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(3), 478–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020919807
12.
EllegaardO.WallinJ. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
EvansM. D. (2022). Nonprofit journals publication patterns: Visibility or invisibility of gender?VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00470-x
15.
GazleyB.GuoC. (2020). What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A systematic review of the literature. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21433
JacksonS. K.GuerreroS.AppeS. (2014). The state of nonprofit and philanthropic studies doctoral education. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014549056
18.
KangC. H.BaekY. M.KimH.-J. (2022). Half a century of NVSQ: Thematic stability across years and editors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(3), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211017676
LarsenP.Von InsM. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 84(3), 575–603.
21.
LohmannR. A. (2007). Charity, philanthropy, public service, or enterprise: What are the big questions of nonprofit management today?Public Administration Review, 67(3), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00727.x
22.
LuJ.LinW.WangQ. (2019). Does a more diversified revenue structure lead to greater financial capacity and less vulnerability in nonprofit organizations? A bibliometric and meta-analysis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(3), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00093-9
23.
MaJ.EbeidI. A.de WitA.XuM.YangY.BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2020). Computational social science for nonprofit studies: Developing a toolbox and database for the field. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g9d8u
24.
MaJ.KonrathS. (2018). A century of nonprofit studies: Scaling the knowledge of the field. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(6), 1139–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00057-5
25.
Macías RuanoA. J.Milán-GarcíaJ.Marruecos RumíM. E.De Pablo ValencianoJ. (2021). Scientific production on the social economy: A review of worldwide research. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(5), 925–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00361-7
26.
MadrueñoR.TezanosS. (2018). The contemporary development discourse: Analysing the influence of development studies’ journals. World Development, 109, 334–345.
27.
MichelsC.SchmochU. (2012). The growth of science and database coverage. Scientometrics, 93(3), 831–846.
28.
MinkowitzH.TwumasiA.BerrettJ. L.ChenX.StewartA. J. (2020). Checking in on the state of nonprofit scholarship: A review of recent research. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 6(2), 182–208. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.6.2.182-208
29.
MirabellaR. M. (2007). University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A 10-year review and projections of future trends. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(Suppl. 4), 11S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007305051
30.
MirabellaR. M.WishN. B. (2000). The “best place” debate: A comparison of graduate education programs for nonprofit managers. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00082
31.
MönksJ.CarbonnierG.MelletA.De HaanL. (2017). Towards a renewed vision of development studies. International Development Policy/Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.2393
32.
MusickM. A.WilsonJ. (2007). Volunteers: A social profile. Indiana University Press.
NiC.SugimotoC. R.RobbinA. (2017). Examining the evolution of the field of public administration through a bibliometric analysis of public administration review. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12737
35.
PorterA. L.RoessnerJ. D.CohenA. S.PerreaultM. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775841
36.
RafolsI.MeyerM. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
37.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/
38.
SchoenefeldJ. J. (2021). Interest groups, NGOs or civil society organisations? The framing of non-state actors in the EU. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(3), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00283-w
ShierM. L.HandyF. (2014). Research trends in nonprofit graduate studies: A growing interdisciplinary field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014548279
41.
SmithD. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976409402300305
Van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
45.
WalkM.AnderssonF. O. (2020). Where do nonprofit and civil society researchers publish? Perceptions of nonprofit journal quality. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 6(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.6.1.79-95
Wan UtapA. K.ZainabA. N.AnuarN. B. (2009). Bibliometric studies on single journals: A review. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 14(1), 17–55.
48.
WeibleC. M.CarterD. P. (2017). Advancing policy process research at its overlap with public management scholarship and nonprofit and voluntary action studies. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12194
WilsonJ. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.
51.
WolframD. (2003). Applied informetrics for information retrieval research. Greenwood Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
