Scholars have long been interested in the relationship between civil society and democracy. Today, international donors promote civil society in developing countries, and they explicitly define civil society to include nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). It remains an open question, however, whether service provision NGOs in developing countries fulfill this civil society function. Some prominent scholarship argues that only NGOs that explicitly pursue advocacy perform civil society roles; service provision NGOs do not. I address this question, testing the relationship between individuals’ experience with, and perceptions of, NGOs and their political participation in voting, protests, and raising issues with public officials. Using data from Kenya, I find that individuals who report contact with, or positive views of, NGOs are more likely to engage in certain political activities, providing some evidence for the inclusion of NGOs in the concept of civil society. I theorize mechanisms by which service provision NGOs may affect various forms of participation.
AbersR. N.KeckM. E. (2009). Mobilizing the state: The erratic partner in Brazil’s participatory water policy. Politics & Society, 37(2), 289–314.
2.
AlmondG.VerbaS. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton University Press.
3.
BaggettaM. (2009a). Civic opportunities in associations: Interpersonal interaction, governance experience and institutional relationships. Social Forces, 88(1), 175–199.
4.
BaggettaM. (2009b, August). Making citizens: How associations stimulate individual civic engagement through the development of civic mindfulness [Conference session]. American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, United States.
5.
BanksN.HulmeD.EdwardsM. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort?World Development, 66, 707–718.
6.
BebbingtonA. (1997). New states, new NGOs? Crises and transitions among rural development NGOs in the Andean region. World Development, 25(11), 1755–1765.
7.
BebbingtonA.GuggenheimS.OlsonE.WoolcockM. (2004). Exploring social capital debates at the world bank. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(5), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022038042000218134
8.
BoothJ. A.RichardP. B. (1998). Civil society, political capital, and democratization in Central America. Journal of Politics, 60(3), 780–800.
9.
BouldingC. E. (2010). NGOs and political participation in weak democracies: Subnational evidence on protest and voter turnout from Bolivia. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 456–468.
10.
BouldingC. E. (2014). NGOs, political protest and civil society. Cambridge University Press.
11.
BouldingC. E.GibsonC. C. (2009). Supporters or challengers? The effects of nongovernmental organizations on local politics in Bolivia. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 479–500.
12.
BrassJ. N. (2012). Blurring boundaries: The integration of NGOs into the governance of Kenya. Governance, 25(2), 209–235.
13.
BrassJ. N. (2016). Allies or adversaries: NGOs and the state in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
BrattonM.MattesR.Gyimah-BoadiE. (2004). Public opinion, democracy, and market reform in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
17.
BrautigamD. A.SegarraM. (2007). Difficult partnerships: The World Bank, States, and NGOs. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(4), 149–181.
18.
BrownD. S.BrownJ. C.DesposatoS. W. (2007). Promoting and preventing political change through internationally funded NGO activity. Latin American Research Review, 42(1), 126–138.
19.
CarrE. C. (2011). Delivering development: Globalization’s shoreline and the road to a sustainable future. Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
ChahimD.PrakashA. (2014). NGOization, foreign funding, and the Nicaraguan civil society. Voluntas, 25(2), 487–513.
21.
ChambersR. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. Longman.
22.
ClarkJ. (1995). The state, popular participation, and the voluntary sector. World Development, 23(4), 593–601.
23.
CrensonM. A.GinsbergB. (2004). Downsizing democracy: How America sidelined its citizens and privatized its public. Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
DeMatteeA. J. (2019). Covenants, constitutions, and distinct law types: Investigating governments’ restrictions on CSOs using an institutional approach. Voluntas, 30, 1229–1255.
25.
DiamondL. (1997). Introduction: In search of consolidation. In DiamondL.PlattnerM. F.ChuY.-H.TienH.-M. (Eds.), Consolidating the third wave democracies (pp. xiii–xlvii). Johns Hopkins Press.
DodgeJ.OspinaS. M. (2016). Nonprofits as schools of democracy: Comparative case study of two environmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(3), 478–499.
28.
DupuyK.PrakashA. (2020). Why restrictive NGO foreign funding laws reduce voter turnout in Africa’s national elections. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019897848
29.
DupuyK.RonJ.PrakashA. (2016). Hands off my regime! Governments’ restrictions on foreign aid to non-governmental organizations in poor and middle-income countries. World Development, 84(Suppl. C), 299–311.
30.
EdwardsM.HulmeD. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 6, 961–973.
31.
FearonJ. D.HumphreysM.WeinsteinJ. M. (2015). How does development assistance affect collective action capacity? Results from a field experiment in post-conflict Liberia. American Political Science Review, 109(3), 450–469.
32.
FoleyM. W.EdwardsB. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52.
GotchevA. (1998). NGOs and promotion of democracy and civil society in east-Central Europe [NATO Research Fellowships Programme]. North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
35.
GugertyM. K.KremerM. (2008). Outside funding and the dynamics of participation in community associations. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 585–602.
36.
Gyimah-BoadiE. (1996). Civil society in Africa. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 118–132.
37.
HarbesonJ. W. (1994). Civil society and political renaissance in Africa. In HarbesonJ. W.RothchildD.ChazanN. (Eds.), Civil society and the state in Africa (pp. 1–32). Lynne Reinner.
38.
HarrisA. S.HernE. (2019). Taking to the streets: Protest as an expression of political preference in Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 52(8), 1169–1199.
39.
HearnJ. (2000). Aiding democracy? Donors and civil society in South Africa. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 815–830.
40.
HearnJ. (2007). African NGOs: The new compradors?Development and Change, 38(6), 1095–1110.
41.
HeinrichV. F. (2001). The role of NGOs in strengthening the foundations of South African democracy. Voluntas, 12(1), 1–15.
42.
HernE. (2017). In the gap the state left: Policy feedback, collective behavior, and political participation in Zambia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 52(4), 510–531.
43.
HersheyM. (2019). Whose agency: The politics and practice of Kenya’s HIV-prevention NGOs. University of Wisconsin Press.
44.
HolmenH.JirstromM. (2009). Look who’s talking! Second thoughts about NGOs as representing civil society. Journal of Asian & African Studies, 44(4), 429–448.
45.
HowardM. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge University Press.
46.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press.
47.
KanyingaK. (2004). Civil society formations in Kenya: A growing role in development and democracy. In OkelloD. (Ed.), Civil society in the third republic (pp. 152–159). National Council of NGOs.
48.
KanyingaK. (2011). Stopping a conflagration: The response of Kenyan civil society to the post-2007 election violence. Politikon, 38(1), 85–109.
49.
KlesnerJ. L. (2007). Social capital and political participation in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 42(2), 1–32.
50.
KortenD. C. (1980). Community development and rural development: A learning process approach. Public Administration Review, 40(5), 480–511.
51.
LeeA.-R. (2010). The quality of social capital and political participation in South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(3), 483–505.
52.
LeeA.-R.GlasureY. U. (2007). Social capital and political participation in South Korea. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 34(2), 101–118.
53.
LeRouxK.KrawczykK. (2014). Can nonprofit organizations increase voter turnout? Findings from an agency-based voter mobilization experiment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 272–292.
54.
LeVanA. C. (2011). Questioning Tocqueville in Africa: Continuity and change in civil society during Nigeria’s democratization. Democratization, 18(1), 135–159.
55.
LewisD. (2004). On the difficulty of studying “civil society”: Reflections on NGOs, state and democracy in Bangladesh. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 38(3), 299–322.
56.
MarshC. (2002). Social capital and grassroots democracy in Russia’s regions: Evidence from the 1999-2001 gubernatorial elections. Demokratizatsiya, 10(1), 19–36.
MenonN.DaftaryD. (2011). The impact of associational membership on political engagement: A comparative investigation of Brazil and India. International Social Work, 54(1), 81–96.
59.
MercerC. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5–22.
60.
MercerC. (2003). Performing partnership: Civil society and the illusions of good governance in Tanzania. Political Geography, 22, 741–763.
61.
MoehlerD. C. (2010). Democracy, governance, and randomized development assistance. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628(1), 30–46.
62.
MurdieA.BhasinT. (2011). Aiding and abetting: Human rights INGOs and domestic protest. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(2), 163–191.
63.
Nelson-NuñezJ. (2018). Substitution or facilitation: Service-delivery NGOs and political engagement in the Peruvian Amazon. Comparative Political Studies, 52(3), 445–477.
64.
NewtonK. (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 575–586.
65.
Nongovernmental Organizations Co-ordination Board. (2009). Report on the national validation survey of NGOs. Government of Kenya.
66.
Nurul AlamS. M. (2011). Health service delivery: The state of government-non-government relations in Bangladesh. Public Administration and Development, 31(4), 273–281.
67.
OrvisS. (2003). Kenyan civil society: Bridging the urban-rural divide?Journal of Modern African Studies, 41(02), 247–268.
68.
PaxtonP. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254–277.
69.
PutnamR. (1993). Making democracy work: Civil traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
70.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
71.
RahmanS. (2006). Development, democracy and the NGO sector. Journal of Developing Societies, 22(4), 451–473.
72.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Longman.
73.
SanyalP. (2009). From credit to collective action: The role of microfinance in promoting women’s social capital and normative influence. American Sociological Review, 74(4), 529–550.
74.
SeligsonA. L. (1999). Civic association and democratic participation in central America. Comparative Political Studies, 32(3), 342–362.
75.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee. (2006). Promotion of democracy by nongovernmental organizations: An action agenda: Testimony by ambassador Mark Palmer. U.S. Senate.
76.
SkocpolT. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. University of Oklahoma Press.
77.
SkocpolT.FiorinaM. P. (Eds.). (1999). Civic engagement in American democracy. Brookings Institution Press.
78.
TarnoffC.LawsonM. L. (2011). Foreign aid: An introduction to U.S. programs and policy. DIANE.
79.
TavitsM. (2006). Making democracy work more? Exploring the linkage between social capital and government performance. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 211–225.
80.
TocquevilleA. D. (1835). Democracy in America (2000 ed.). HarperCollins.
81.
TomzM.WittenbergJ.KingG. (2003). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. https://gking.harvard.edu/clarify
82.
UlvilaM.HossainF. (2002). Development NGOs and political participation of the poor in Bangladesh and Nepal. Voluntas, 13(2), 149–163.
83.
United Nations Development Programme. (2019). United Nations human development report. United Nations.
84.
UphoffN.EsmanM. J.KrishnaA. (1998). Reasons for success: Learning from instructive experiences in rural development. Kumarian Press.
85.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
86.
WantchekonL. (2003). Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics, 55(3), 399–422.
87.
WhiteS. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6–15.
88.
WiktorowiczQ. (2002). The political limits to nongovernmental organizations in Jordan. World Development, 30(1), 77–93.
89.
World Bank. (2009). World bank–civil society engagement: Review of fiscal years 2007 to 2009.
ZoellickR. (2011). The Middle East and North Africa: A new social contract for development speech given at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. World Bank.
