Foreign aid contributes to about 10% of gross domestic product (GDP) of developing countries. To distribute aid in recipient countries, Western donors increasingly rely on nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Yet, since the mid-1990s, 39 developing countries have adopted laws restricting the inflow of foreign aid to NGOs operating in their jurisdictions. In response to these restrictions, have bilateral donors reduced aid, either as a punishment or because they cannot find appropriate NGOs for aid delivery? We explore this question by examining a panel of 134 aid-receiving countries for the years 1993-2012. We find that all else equal, the adoption of a restrictive NGO finance law is associated with a 32% decline in bilateral aid inflows in subsequent years. These findings hold even after controlling for levels of democracy and civil liberties, which suggests that aid reduction responds to the removal of NGOs from aid delivery chains, and not to democracy recession.
AlesinaA.DollarD. (2000). Who gives foreign aid to whom and why?Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 33-63.
2.
BanksN.HulmeD.EdwardsM. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort?World Development, 66, 707-718.
3.
BauhrM.CharronN.NasiritousiN. (2013). Does corruption cause aid fatigue? Public opinion and the anti-corruption paradox. International Studies Quarterly, 57, 568-579.
4.
BeckN.KatzJ. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89, 634-647.
5.
BloodgoodE. A.Tremblay-BoireJ.PrakashA. (2014). National styles of NGO regulation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 716-736.
6.
BrattonM. (1989). The politics of government-NGO relations in Africa. World Development, 17, 569-587.
7.
BräutigamD. A.KnackS. (2004). Foreign aid, institutions, and governance in sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52, 255-285.
8.
CarothersT.BrechenmacherS. (2014). Closing space: Democracy and human rights support under fire. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
9.
CollierP.DollarD. (2004). Development effectiveness: What have we learnt?The Economic Journal, 114, F244-F271.
10.
De MesquitaB. B.SmithA. (2007). Foreign aid and policy concessions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 251-284.
11.
DietrichS. (2013). Bypass or engage? Explaining donor delivery tactics in foreign aid allocation. International Studies Quarterly, 57, 698-712.
12.
DobbinsJ. F. (2003). America’s role in nation-building: From Germany to Iraq. Survival, 45(4), 87-110.
13.
DupuyK.RonJ.PrakashA. (2015). Who survived? Ethiopia’s regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs. Review of International Political Economy, 22, 419-456.
14.
DupuyK.RonJ.PrakashA. (2016). Hands off my regime! Governments’ restrictions on foreign aid to non-governmental organizations in poor and middle-income countries. World Development, 84, 299-311.
15.
EasterlyW. (2006). The White man’s burden: Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
16.
EdwardsM.HulmeD. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24, 961-973.
17.
EnglebertP.TullD. M. (2008). Postconflict reconstruction in Africa: Flawed ideas about failed states. International Security, 32, 106-139.
18.
EtzioniA. (1998). The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19.
GibsonC.AnderssonK.OstromE.ShivakumarS. (2005). The Samaritan’s dilemma: The political economy of development aid. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
HathawayO. (2007). Why do countries commit to human rights treaties?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 588-621.
21.
HawkinsD.LakeD.NielsonD.TierneyM. (Eds.). (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HendersonS. L. (2011). Civil society in Russia: State-society relations in the post-Yeltsin era. Problems of Post-Communism, 58(3), 11-27.
23.
HowelJ.IshkanianA.ObadareE.SeckinelginH. M.GlasiusM. (2012). The backlash against civil society in the wake of the long war on terror. Development in Practice, 18(1), 82-93.
24.
JalaliR. (2008). International funding of NGOs in India: Bringing the state back in. Voluntas, 19, 161-188.
25.
KaufmanB. I. (1992). Trade and aid: Eisenhower’s foreign economic policy, 1953-1961. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
KeckM.SikkinkK. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
KharasH. (2007). Trends and issues in development aid (Working papers). Washington, DC: Wolfensohn Center for Development, The Brookings Institute.
28.
KipkorirB. (1997, April29). Testimony before the trade sub-committee of the house ways and means committee. Hearing on the African Growth and Opportunity End of Dependency Act of 1996.
29.
KonoD.MontinolaG. (2009). Does foreign aid support autocrats, democrats, or both?The Journal of Politics, 71, 704-718.
30.
LancasterC. (2008). Foreign aid: Diplomacy, development, domestic politics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
LewisT. (2003). Environmental aid: Driven by recipient need or donor interests?Social Science Quarterly, 84, 144-161.
32.
LimS.MosleyL.PrakashA. (2015). Revenue substitution? How foreign aid inflows moderate the effect of bilateral trade pressures on labor rights. World Development, 67, 295-309.
33.
LischerS. K. (2007). Military intervention and the humanitarian “force multiplier.”Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 13(1), 99-118.
34.
LöwenheimO. (2007). The responsibility to responsibilize: Foreign offices and the issuing of travel warnings. International Political Sociology, 1, 203-221.
35.
LundsgaardeE.BreunigC.PrakashA. (2010). Instrumental philanthropy: Trade and the allocation of foreign aid. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43, 733-761.
36.
MaizelsA.NissankeM. K. (1984). Motivations for aid to developing countries. World Development, 12, 879-900.
37.
McKinleyR. D.LittleR. (1979). The U.S. aid relationship: A test of the recipient need and the donor interest models. Political Studies, 27, 236-250.
38.
MendelsonS. (2015, March11). Dark days for civil society: What’s going wrong—and how data can help. Foreign Affairs.
39.
MeyerJ. W.BoliJ.ThomasG. M.RamirezF. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144-181.
40.
MillerA. R.DolšakN. (2007.). Issue linkages in international environmental policy: The international whaling commission and Japanese development aid. Global Environmental Politics, 7(1), 69-96.
41.
MitlinkD.HickeyS.A. Bebbington. (2007). Reclaiming development? NGOs and the challenge of alternatives. World Development, 35, 1699-1720.
42.
NatsiosA. S. (2005). Five debates on international development: The US perspective. Development Policy Review, 24, 131-139.
43.
NeumayerE. (2003). The pattern of aid giving: The impact of good governance on development assistance. London, England: Routledge.
44.
PetitevilleF. (1996). Quatre Décennies de “Coopération Franco-Africaine”: Usages et Usures d’un Clientélisme [Four Decades of French African Policy: An Obsolete Clientalist Relationship]. Revue Études Internationales, 27, 571-601.
45.
PhillipsS.SmithS. R. (Eds.). (2011). Governance and regulation in the third sector: International perspectives. New York, NY:Routledge.
46.
PutnamR. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
SachsJ. (2006). The end of poverty. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
49.
SalamonL. (1994). The rise of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Affairs, 73, 109-122.
50.
SchraederP. J.HookS. W.TaylorB. (1998). Clarifying the foreign aid puzzle: A comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish aid flows. World Politics, 50, 294-323.
51.
SmithS. R.LipskyM. (1993). Nonprofits for hire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
