The nature of the relationship between the time people spend on paid work and volunteering remains debated in the social sciences. Time constraint theory suggests a negative relationship because people can allocate only as much time to volunteering as their work responsibilities permit. However, social integration theory suggests a more complex inverse U-shaped relationship because paid work not only limits people’s free time but also plays a key role in their social integration. Departing from these competing theories, this study uses two-wave panel data from Denmark to examine the relationship between hours of paid work and volunteering. In support of time constraint theory, the results suggest that hours of paid work have a significant negative effect on the total number of hours that people spend volunteering, not mainly because paid work hours affect people’s propensity to volunteer but because they affect the number of hours that volunteers contribute.
AllisonP. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114.
2.
AndersenR.CurtisJ.GrabbE. (2006). Trends in civic association activity in four democracies: The special case of women in the United States. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 376–400.
3.
AnttilaT.OinasT.TammelinM.NättiJ. (2015). Working-time regimes and work-life balance in Europe. European Sociological Review, 31(6), 713–724.
4.
BelottiF.DebP.ManningW. G.NortonE. (2015). Twopm: Two-part models. The Stata Journal, 15(1), 3–20.
5.
DawsonC.BakerP. L.DowellD. (2019). Getting into the “giving habit”: The dynamics of volunteering in the UK. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(5), 1006–1021.
6.
EinolfC. J. (2011). Gender differences in the correlates of volunteering and charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1092–1112.
7.
ForbesK. F.ZampelliE. M. (2011). An assessment of alternative structural models of philanthropic behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1148–1167.
8.
FreemanR. B. (1997). Working for nothing: The supply of volunteer labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), S140–S166.
9.
FridbergT.HenriksenL. S. (2014). Udviklingen i frivilligt arbejde 2004-2012 [Trends in volunteering, 2004-2012]. SFI—Det nationale forskningcenter for velfærd.
10.
GoldenL. (2001). Flexible work schedules: Which workers get them?American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7), 1157–1178.
11.
GomezR.GundersonM. (2003). Volunteer activity and the demands of work and family. Industrial Relations, 58(4), 573–589.
12.
GanzeboomH. B. G.TreimanD. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 international standard classification of occupations. Social Science Research, 25(3), 201–239
13.
GanzeboomH. B. G.TreimanD. J. (2010) Occupational status measures for the new international standard classification of occupations Isco-08: With a discussion of the new classification. Available at: http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/isol/isol2010c2-ganzeboom.pdf (accessed 2 May 2019).
14.
GrahamJ. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.
15.
HermansenJ. (2018). Getting it right: Estimating the share of volunteers in Denmark. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 9. https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.2146
16.
JanoskiT.MusickM.WilsonJ. (1998). Being volunteered? The impact of social participation and pro-social attitudes on volunteering. Sociological Forum, 13(3), 495–519.
17.
KallebergA. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22.
18.
KanM. Y.PudneyS. (2008). Measurement error in stylized and diary data on time use. Sociological Methodology, 38(1), 101–132.
19.
KelliherC.AndersonD. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106.
20.
MarshallG. A.TaniguchiH. (2012). Good jobs, good deeds: The gender-specific influences of job characteristics on volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(1), 213–235.
21.
MorganS. L.WinshipC. (2015). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. Cambridge University Press.
22.
MusickM.WilsonJ. (2008). Volunteers. Indiana University Press.
23.
PedersenC. B. (2011). The Danish civil registration system. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39, 22–25.
24.
PiatakJ. S. (2016). Time is on my side: A framework to examine when unemployed individuals volunteer. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(6), 1169–1190.
25.
QvistH.-P. Y. (2015). Deltagelse i frivilligt arbejde og tidsforbrug på frivilligt arbejde: To sider af samme sag? [Participation in volunteering and time use for volunteering: Two sides of the same coin?]. Dansk Sociologi, 26(2), 53–73.
26.
QvistH.-P. Y.FolkestadB.FridbergT.LundåsenS. W. (2019). Trends in volunteering in Scandinavia. In HenriksenL. S.StrømsnesK.SvedbergL. (Eds.), Civic engagement in Scandinavia: Volunteering, informal help and giving in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Springer.
27.
QvistH.-P. Y.HenriksenL. S.FridbergT. (2018). The consequences of weakening organizational attachment for volunteering in Denmark, 2004–2012. European Sociological Review, 34(5), 589–601.
28.
RauB. L.HylandM. M. (2002). Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 111–136.
29.
RobinsonJ. P.GershunyJ.SmithD. H.FisherK.LeeC.-W.StebbinsR. A. (2016). Leisure and time-use perspectives on volunteering. In SmithD. H.StebbinsR. A.GrotzJ. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of volunteering, civic participation, and nonprofit associations. Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
RotoloT.WilsonJ. (2007). The effects of children and employment status on the volunteer work of American women. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 487–503.
31.
SalamonL. M.AnheierH. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector: The problem of classification. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 3(3), 267–309.
32.
SmithD. H.WangL. (2016). Conducive social roles and demographics influencing volunteering. In SmithD. H.StebbinsR. A.GrotzJ. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of volunteering, civic participation, and nonprofit associations (pp. 632–681). Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
SzollosA. (2009). Toward a psychology of chronic time pressure: Conceptual and methodological review. Time & Society, 18(2–3), 332–350.
34.
TaniguchiH. (2006). Men’s and women’s volunteering: Gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 83–101.
35.
TaniguchiH. (2012). The determinants of formal and informal volunteering: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 920–939.
36.
TarisR. (2000). A Primer in Longitudinal Data Analysis. Sage Publications.
37.
van IngenE. (2008). Social participation revisited: Disentangling and explaining period, life-cycle and cohort effects. Acta Sociologica, 51(2), 103–121.
38.
van IngenE.DekkerP. (2011). Changes in the determinants of volunteering: Participation and time investment between 1975 and 2005 in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 682–702.
39.
WiertzD.LimC. (2019). The civic footprints of labor market participation: Longitudinal evidence from the United States, 2002–2015. Social Forces, 97(4), 1757–1784.
40.
WilsonJ. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.
41.
WilsonJ. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.
42.
WinshipC.RadbillL. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 23(2), 230–257.
43.
WooldridgeJ. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
