Empirical research on donor behavior infers from donations being negatively related to overhead ratios (or indicators based on these ratios) that donors give more to more “efficient” organizations. This relation is proved to be at least partly driven by a purely mechanical link between donations and overhead ratios, which therefore should be isolated when studying empirically the behavioral effect of overhead ratio–based indicators on donors’ giving decisions.
BakijaJ.HeimB. (2008). How does charitable giving respond to incentives and income? Dynamic panel estimates accounting for predictable changes in taxation (NBER Working Paper 14237). National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 924–973.
3.
BennettR.SavaniS. (2003). Predicting the accuracy of public perceptions of charity performance. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11, 329–342.
4.
BhattacharyaR.TinkelmanD. (2009). How tough are better business bureau/wise giving alliance financial standards?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 467–489.
5.
BrooksA. C. (2007). Income tax policy and charitable giving. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 599–612.
6.
CastanedaM. A.GarenJ.ThorntonJ. (2008). Competition, contractability, and the market for donors to non-profits. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, 24, 215–246.
HabibpourM. M.PeifferM.PepermansR.JegersM. (2018). How giving affects giving: A long-term analysis of donations. Applied Economics, 50, 2402–2413.
9.
JacobsF. A.MarudasN. P. (2009). The combined effect of donation price and administrative inefficiency on donations to US non-profit organizations. Financial Accountability and Management, 25, 33–53.
10.
JegersM. (2008). Managerial economics of non-profit organizations. Routledge.
11.
KeatingE. K.ParsonsL. M.RobertsA. A. (2008). Misreporting fundraising: How do non-profit organizations account for telemarketing campaigns?Accounting Review, 83, 417–446.
12.
KrishnanR.YetmanM. H.YetmanR. J. (2004). Financial disclosure management by non-profit organizations [Working paper]. University of California at Davis.
13.
KrishnanR.YetmanM. H.YetmanR. J. (2006). Expense misreporting in non-profit organizations. Accounting Review, 81, 399–420.
14.
ParsonsL. M. (2003). Is accounting information from non-profit organizations useful to donors? A review of charitable giving and value-relevance. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 104–129.
15.
ParsonsL. M.PryorC.RobertsA. A. (2017). Pressure to manage ratios and willingness to do so: Evidence from nonprofit managers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46, 705–724.
16.
PortilloJ. E.StinnJ. (2018). Overhead aversion: Do some types of overhead matter more than others?Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 72, 40–50.
17.
QuosigkB. N.ForgioneD. A. (2018). The association of program ratios and consolidation choices: Evidence from nonprofit hospitals. Accounting Horizons, 32, 147–163.
18.
TinkelmanD. (1998). Differences in sensitivity of financial statement users to joint allocations: The case of non-profit organizations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 13, 377–393.
19.
TinkelmanD.MankaneyK. (2007). When is administrative efficiency associated with charitable donations?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 41–64.
20.
Van der HeijdenH. (2013). Charities in competition: Effects of accounting information on donating adjustments. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25, 1–13.
21.
WeisbrodB. A.DominguezN. D. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior?Journal of Public Economics, 30, 83–95.
22.
WongJ.OrtmannA. (2016). Do donors care about the price of giving? A review of the evidence, with some theory to organize it. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27, 958–978.
23.
YetmanM. H.YetmanR. J. (2013). Do donors discount low-quality accounting information?Accounting Review, 88, 1041–1067.
