This research examines the relationship among Board Diversity, Social Capital, and Governance Effectiveness by asking, “does board ethno-racial diversity moderate the relationship between Social Capital and Governance Effectiveness, and if so, how?” Exploring the direct and interacting effects of demographic diversity and Social Capital, and their relation to governing-group effectiveness using a two-sample field survey design, we illustrate whether heterogeneous or homogeneous group compositions amplify or attenuate Governance Effectiveness, and to what degree. Primary analyses find no support for Board Diversity moderating the Social Capital-Governance Effectiveness relationship, with secondary analysis revealing a more complex interaction for Governance Effectiveness, albeit inconsistently, across samples. Our investigation points to the value of social resources in understanding governance as an inherently socially complex activity or capability, predicated on truce or mutual agreement and shaped by the composition and connections of boards.
AdlerP. S.KwonS.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.
3.
BalasubramanianS.KonanaP.MenonN. M. (2003). Customer satisfaction in virtual environments: A study of online investing. Management Science, 49(7), 871–889.
4.
BennettR.SavaniS. (2011). Surviving mission drift: How charities can turn dependence on government contract funding to their own advantage. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(2), 217–231.
5.
BernsteinR. S.BuseK.BilimoriaD. (2016). Revisiting agency and stewardship theories: Perspectives from nonprofit board chairs and CEOs. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 26(4), 489–498.
6.
BlalockH. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. John Wiley.
7.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press.
8.
BradshawP.FredetteC. (2013). Determinants of the range of ethnocultural diversity on nonprofit boards: A study of large Canadian nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1111–1133.
9.
BradshawP.MurrayV. V.WolpinJ. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of relationships among broad structure, process, and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 227–249.
10.
BradshawP.MurrayV. V.WolpinJ. (1996). Women on boards of nonprofits: What difference do they make?Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6(3), 241–254.
11.
BrownD. A. H.BrownD. L.AnastasopoulosV. (2002). Women on boards: Not just the right thing . . . But the “bright” thing. The Conference Board of Canada.
12.
BrownW. A. (2002). Inclusive governance practices in nonprofit organizations and implications for practice. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 12(4), 369–385.
13.
BrownW. A.GuoC. (2010). Exploring the key roles for nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 536–546.
14.
BurtR. S. (1997). The contingent value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.
15.
CollisD. J. (1994). How valuable are organizational capabilities?Strategic Management Journal, 15, 143–152.
16.
CoxT. H. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
17.
CoxT. H.LobelS. A.McLeodP. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827–847.
18.
De VriesM. F. R. K. (1999). High-performance teams: Lessons from the pygmies. Organizational Dynamics, 27(3), 66–77.
19.
DruckerP. F. (1990). Lessons for successful nonprofit governance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1(1), 7–14.
20.
EndersC. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(1), 128–141.
21.
EnjolrasB. (2009). A governance-structure approach to voluntary organizations. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(5), 761–783.
22.
FerrinD. L.DirksK. T.ShahP. P. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 870–883.
23.
FredetteC.BernsteinR. S. (2019). Ethno-racial diversity on nonprofit boards: A critical mass perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(5), 931–952.
24.
FredetteC.BradshawP. (2012). Social capital and nonprofit governance effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 391–409.
25.
FredetteC.BradshawP.KrauseH. (2016). From diversity to inclusion: A multimethod study of diverse governing groups. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(Suppl. 1), 28S–51S.
26.
GargiuloM.BenassiM. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of Social Capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183–196.
27.
GoodsteinJ.GautamK.BoekerW. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity of strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241–250.
28.
GrahamJ. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549–576.
29.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
30.
GranovetterM. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
31.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
32.
HarrisD. A.HelfatC. E. (2007). The board of directors as a social network. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(3), 228–237.
33.
HarrisE. E. (2014). The impact of Board Diversity and expertise on nonprofit performance. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 25(2), 113–130.
34.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.
35.
HawkinsP. H. (2014). Diversity for nonprofits: Mission drift or mission fulfillment?Journal of Diversity Management, 9(1), 41–50.
36.
HenselerJ.RingleC.SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
37.
HermanR. D.RenzD. O. (1998). Nonprofit organizational effectiveness: Contrasts between especially effective and less effective organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(1), 23–38.
38.
InkpenA. C.TsangE. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.
39.
JayneM. E. A.DipboyeR. L. (2004). Leveraging diversity to improve business performance: Research findings and recommendations for organizations. Human Resource Management, 43(4), 409–424.
40.
JehnK. A.BezrukovaK. (2010). The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 24–42.
41.
JehnK. A.NorthcraftG. B.NealeM. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.
42.
JohnsonS. G.SchnatterlyK.HillA. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.
43.
KanterR. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.
44.
KaplanS. (2015). Truce breaking and remaking: The CEO’s role in changing organizational routines. In GavettiG.OcasioW. (Eds.), Cognition and strategy (Vol. 32, pp. 1–45). Emerald Group.
45.
KonradA. M.KramerV.ErkutS. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards [Article]. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.
46.
LabiancaG.BrassD. J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 596–614.
47.
LauD. C.MurnighanJ. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.
48.
LeanaC. R.PilF. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17(3), 353–366.
49.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of Missing Completely at Random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202.
50.
MalhotraA.DashS. (2011). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th ed.). Pearson.
51.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
52.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
53.
NewmanD. A. (2014). Missing data: Five practical guidelines. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372–411.
54.
OhH.ChungM.-H.LabiancaG. (2004). Group Social Capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860–875.
55.
PelledL. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615–631.
56.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
57.
PrashanthamS.DhanarajC. (2010). The dynamic influence of Social Capital on the international growth of new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 967–994.
58.
SicilianoJ. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1313–1320.
59.
SimpsonE. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163(4148), 688–688.
60.
Statistics Canada. (2016). Census of population. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-400-X2016189.
SundaramurthyC.PukthuanthongK.KorY. (2014). Positive and negative synergies between the CEO’s and the corporate board’s human and Social Capital: A study of biotechnology firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), 845–868.
63.
TashevaS. N.HillmanA. (2019). Integrating diversity at different levels: Multi-level human capital, Social Capital, and demographic diversity and their implications for team effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 746–765.
64.
TsaiW.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.
65.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
66.
WeickK. E.RobertsK. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381.
67.
WeisingerJ. Y.SalipanteP. F. (2005). A grounded theory for building ethnically bridging Social Capital in voluntary organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 29–55.
68.
WestonR.GoreP. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751.
69.
ZbarackiM. J.BergenM. (2010). When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21(5), 955–972.
