Welfare reform discussions in the 1990s included proposals for government to support religious organizations that provide social services. This fostered a debate about the proper relationship between government and faith-based organizations. This spurred an increase in academic publications by scholars from disciplines such as social work, religious studies, public policy, and nonprofit studies. Publications focused on a number of topics, including the unique characteristics of faith-based organizations, the services and outcomes they provided, their involvement with the government, and methodologies available for studying them. We found a rapid increase in publications starting in 1996. These peaked in 2003 and have declined since 2008. Our scan of the literature on U.S. noncongregation faith-based service providers identified over 600 works. In this article, we review the literature on the definition of faith-based organizations, typologies used to place them on a spectrum of religious expression, and methodological considerations for research on them.
AdkinsJ.KemperR. V. (2006). Oasis housing corporation: From solutions to dissolution in a faith-based organization. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 35, 237-264.
2.
AdkinsJ.OcchipintiL.HerreranT. (2010). Not by faith alone: Social services, social justice, and faith-based organizations in the United States. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
3.
BaggettJ. P. (2001). Habitat for humanity: Building private homes, building public religion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
4.
BartkowskiJ. P.RegisH. A. (2003a). Charitable choices. Religion, race, and poverty in the post-welfare era. New York: New York University Press.
5.
BartkowskiJ. P.RegisH. A. (2003b). Religious civility, civil society, and charitable choice: Faith-based poverty relief in the post-welfare era. In McConkeyD.LawlerP. A. (Eds.), Faith, morality, and civil society (pp. 127-144). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
6.
BauerJ.ChivakosA. (2010). What’s Islam got to do with it? American pluralism, ethnographic sensibilities, and faith-based refugee resettlement in Hartford, Connecticut. In AdkinsJ.OcchipintiL.HefferanT. (Eds.), Not by faith alone: Social services, social justice, and faith-based organizations in the United States (Chap. 8, pp. 145-164). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
7.
BielefeldW. (2006). Investigating the implementation of charitable choice. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25, 151-173.
8.
BoddieS. C.CnaanR. A. (2006). Faith-based social services: Measures, assessments, and effectiveness. New York, NY: The Hawthorn Pastoral Press. (Copublished simultaneously as Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 25[3/4])
9.
BrilliantE. D.YoungD. R. (2004). The changing identity of federated community service organizations. Administration in Social Work, 28, 23-46.
10.
BrownD. M.McKeownE. (1997). The poor belong to us: Catholic Charities and American welfare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BruceT. C. (2006). Contested accommodation on the meso level: Discursive adaptation within Catholic Charities’ immigration and refugee services. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1489-1508.
12.
CameronH. (2004). Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs—A European response. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 146-150.
13.
CampbellD. E.GluntE. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of faith-based programs: A local network perspective. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25, 241-259.
14.
ChambréS. M. (2001). The changing nature of “faith” in faith-based organizations: Secularization and ecumenicism in four AIDS organizations in New York C. Social Service Review, 75, 435-455.
15.
ChavesM. (2002). Religious organizations: Data resources and research opportunities. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 1523-1549.
16.
ChavesM. (2004). Congregations in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
ChavesM.WineburgR. J. (2010). Did the faith-based initiative change congregations?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 343-355.
18.
CnaanR. A.BoddieS. C.HandyF.YanceyG.SchneiderR. (2002). The invisible caring hand: American congregations and the provision of welfare. New York: New York University Press.
19.
CnaanR. A.CurtisD. W. (2013). Religious congregations as voluntary associations: An overview. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 1-27.
20.
CochranC. E. (1999). Institutional identity; sacramental potential: Catholic healthcare at century’s end. Christian Bioethics, 5, 26-43.
21.
CraigD. M. (2008). Religious values in the health care market: Stories and structures from Catholic and Jewish hospitals. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 28, 223-243.
22.
CristJ. D.ParsonsM. L.Warner-RobbinsC.MullinsM. V.EspinosaY. M. (2009). Pragmatic action research with 2 vulnerable populations: Mexican American elders and formerly incarcerated women. Family & Community Health, 32, 320-329.
23.
CurranC. E. (1997). The Catholic identity of Catholic institutions. Theological Studies, 58, 90-108.
24.
De JongF. J.HornC. (2008). Opening the black box of faith-based services: Measuring program components and treatment dose. In JoshiP.HawkinsS.NoveyJ., (Eds.), Faith-based and community initiatives: Conference on research, outcomes, and evaluation (pp. 147-177). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
25.
DeglerC. (1950). Out of our past: The forces that shaped modern America. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
26.
DouglassH. P. (1926). 1000 city churches. New York, NY: George H. Doran.
27.
DouglassH. P.BrunnerE. (1935). The Protestant church as a social institution. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.
28.
EllensonD. (2006). What makes a Jewish organization “Jewish.” Journal of Jewish Communal Service, 81(3/4), 129-132.
29.
FaganP. F.HornC.EdwardsC. W.WoodsK. M.CapraraC. (2007). Outcome-based evaluation: Faith-based social service organizations and stewardship. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
30.
FeldnerS. B. (2006). Living our mission: A study of university mission building. Communication Studies, 57, 67-85.
31.
FischerR. L. (2004). The devil is in the details: Implementing outcome measurement in faith-based organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15, 25-40.
32.
FischerR. L.StelterJ. (2006). Testing faith: Improving the evidence base on faith-based human services. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25(3/4), 105-122.
33.
FitzgeraldS. (2010). Religious organizational identity and environmental demands. In AdkinsJ.OcchipintiL.HerreranT. (Eds.) Not by faith alone: Social services, social justice, and faith-based organizations in the United States (pp. 187-206). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
34.
GavinD. (1962). The national conference of Catholic charities:1910-1960. Milwaukee, WI: Catholic Life Publications.
35.
GöçmenI. (2013). The role of faith-based organizations in social welfare systems: A comparison of France, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 495-516.
36.
GoodeJ. (2006). Faith-based organizations in Philadelphia: Neoliberal ideology and the decline of political activism. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 35, 203-236.
37.
GreenJ. C.ShermanA. L. (2002). Fruitful collaborations: A survey of government-funded faith-based programs in 15 states. Charlottesville, VA: Hudson Institute.
38.
GrettenbergerS.BartkowskiJ. P.SmithS. R. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of faith-based welfare agencies: Methodological challenges and possibilities. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25, 223-240.
39.
GumzE. J. (2008). A delicate dance: Identity issues in a religious nonprofit umbrella organization. Families in Society, 89, 274-281.
40.
HallD. (1994). Anxiously engaged: Amy Brown Lyman and Relief Society charity work, 1917-45. Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 27(2), 73-91.
41.
HallP. D. (2005). The rise of the civic engagement tradition. In BaneM. J.CoffinB.HigginsR., (Eds.), Taking faith seriously (Chap. 1, pp. 21-60). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
HardenM. G. (2006). Towards a faith-based program theory. Evaluation Review, 30, 481-504.
HehirJ. B. (2000). “Religious ideas and social policy: Subsidiarity and Catholic style of ministry.” In BaneM. J.CoffinB.ThiemannR., (Eds.), Who will provide? The changing role in religion in American social welfare (Chap. 4; p. 98). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45.
HillR. P. (2006). Distributive justice and Catholic faith-in-action: Lessons from consumer ethnographies. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 35, 183-201.
46.
HodgkinsonV. A.WeitzmanM. S.KirschA. D. (1988). From belief to commitment: The activities and finances of religious congregations in the Unites States: Findings from a national survey (1988 ed). Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
47.
HopkinsC. H. (1940). The rise of the social Gospel in American Protestantism, 1865–1915. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48.
HugenB.VenemaR. (2009). The difference of faith: The influence of faith in human service programs. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 28, 405-429.
49.
HugginsN. I. (1971). Protestants against poverty: Boston’s charities, 1870-1900. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
50.
HunterJ. D. (1985). Conservative Protestantism on the American scene. Social Compass, 32, 233-243.
51.
HutchisonW. J. (1998). The role of religious auspiced agencies in the postmodern era. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 18(3), 55-69.
52.
JanosikC. M. (1999). An organizing framework for specifying and maintaining Catholic identity in American Catholic higher education. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry & Practice, 3, 15-32.
53.
JanzenR.WiebeD. (2010). Putting God in the logic model: Developing a national framework for the evaluation of faith-based organizations. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 25, 1-16.
54.
JeavonsT. H. (1998). “Identifying characteristics of ‘religious’ organizations: An exploratory proposal.” In DemerathN. J.IIIHallP. D.SchmittT.WilliamsR. H., (Eds.), Sacred companies: Organizational aspects of religious aspects of organizations (Chap. 5; pp. 116-131). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
JeavonsT. H. (2004). Religious and faith-based organizations: Do we know one when we see one?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 140-145.
56.
KemperR. V. (2006). Anthropological perspectives on faith-based organizations. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 35(2-3), 141-153.
57.
KemperR. V.AdkinsJ. (2006). Who are my neighbors? Congregation and community in north Texas. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 35, 295-339.
58.
KennedyS. S.BielefeldW. (2006). Charitable choice at work: Evaluating faith-based job programs in the states. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
59.
LairdL. D.CadgeW. (2010). Muslims, medicine, and mercy: Free clinics in Southern California. In AdkinsJ.OcchipintiL.HefferanT., (Eds.), Not by faith alone: Social services, social justice, and faith-based organizations in the United States (Chap. 6, pp. 107-128). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
60.
Lambert-PenningtonK.PfrommJ. (2010). Faith-based development and community renaissance: Tradition and transformation in South Memphis. In AdkinsJ.OcchipintiL.HerreranT. (Eds.), Not by faith alone: Social services, social justice, and faith-based organizations in the United States (pp. 69-90). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
61.
MathewsS. (1924). The service of the church to social advance. Journal of Social Forces, 2, 546-548.
62.
McGrewC. C.CnaanR. A. (2006). Finding congregations: Developing conceptual clarity in the study of faith-based social services. In BoddieS. C.CnaanR.A.Faith-based social services: Measures, assessments, and effectiveness (pp. 19-38). New York, NY: The Hawthorn Pastoral Press.
63.
McNamaraP. E.CuffeyJ.CherianA.PauloseS. (2008). Research partnerships between faith-based NGOs and academic researchers: An example from food security and HIV and AIDS research in Delhi, India. Faith & Economics, 52, 50-65.
64.
MonsmaS. V. (1996). When sacred and secular mix: Religious nonprofit organizations and public money. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
65.
MonsmaS. V.MountsC. M. (2002). Working faith: How religious organizations provide welfare-to-work services. Philadelphia: Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society, University of Pennsylvania.
66.
MundellL. (2010). A theology of presence: Faith partnerships with U.S. public schools. In AdkinsJ.OcchipintiL.HerreranT. (Eds.), Not by faith alone: Social services, social justice, and faith-based organizations in the United States (pp. 33-50). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
67.
NagelA. (2006). Charitable choice: The religious component of the US-welfare-reform—Theoretical and methodological reflections on “faith-based-organizations” as social service agencies. Numen, 53, 78-111.
NettingF. E. (2004). Commentary on typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 135-139.
70.
NettingF. E.O’ConnorM.YanceyG. (2006). Belief systems in faith-based human service programs. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25, 261-286.
71.
NewmanH. K. (2006). Faith and philanthropy in Atlanta (Working Paper 06-04). Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
72.
O’GradyJ. (1930). Catholic Charities in the United States: History and problems. New York, NY: Arno Press.
73.
OlaskyM. N. (1992). The tragedy of American compassion. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.
74.
OrloffA.S. (1993). The policies of pensions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
75.
ReeseL. A. (2000). Should the government regulate prophets? Methodological problems with research on faith-based economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 376-383.
76.
RobertsonN. M. (2007). Christian sisterhood, race relations, and the YWCA, 1906-46. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
77.
RodriquezT. (2010). “Bio-pistis”: Conversion of heroin addicts in prisons, on medicine and with God. In AdkinsJ.OcchipintiL.HerreranT. (Eds.), Not by faith alone: Social services, social justice, and faith-based organizations in the United States (pp. 207-230). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
78.
SchneiderJ. A. (1999). Trusting that of God in everyone: Three examples of Quaker-based social service in disadvantaged communities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 269-295.
79.
SchneiderJ. A. (2010). Jewish communities and their organizations. In SchneiderJ. A.MorrisonI. (Eds.), Comparing strategies to maintain connections between faith communities and organizations across religions (Chap. 7, pp. 76-92). College Park: Faith and Organizations Project, University of Maryland.
80.
SchneiderJ. A. (2013). Comparing Stewardship Across Faith-Based Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 517-539.
81.
SchneiderJ. A.MorrisonI.BelcherJ. R.WittbergP.BielefeldW.SinhaJ. W.UnruhH. R. (2009). Maintaining vital connections between faith communities and their nonprofits. College Park: Faith and Organizations Project, University of Maryland.
82.
SchneiderJ. A.WittbergP.UnruhH.SinhaJ. W.BelcherJ. R. (2011). Comparing practical theology across religions and denominations. Review of Religious Research, 52, 405-426.
83.
SiderR. J.UnruhH. R. (2004). Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 109-134.
84.
SinhaJ. W. (2006). A faith-based alternative youth education program: Evaluating a participatory research approach. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25(3/4), 197-221.
85.
SinhaJ. W. (2010). Strategies to maintain connections between faith communities and their nonprofits for African American churches: Findings from the faith and organizations project. College Park: Faith and Organizations Project, University of Maryland College Park.
86.
SinhaJ. W. (2013). Unintended consequence of the faith-based initiative: Organizational practices and religious identity within faith-based human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 563-583.
87.
SkocpolT. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
SmithS. R.SosinM. R. (2001). The varieties of faith-related agencies. Public Administration Review, 61, 651-670.
89.
StoltzfusK. M. (2007). Spiritual interventions in substance abuse treatment and prevention: A review of the literature. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 26(4), 49-69.
90.
TangenbergK. (2004). Spirituality and faith-based social services: Exploring provider values, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 23(3), 3-24.
91.
ThiemannR. F. (2005). “Lutheran social ministry in transition: What’s faith got to do with it?” In BaneM. J.CoffinB.HigginsR. (Eds.), Taking faith seriously (Chap. 6; pp. 1-17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92.
ThyerB. A. (2006). Faith-based programs and the role of empirical research. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25(3/4), 63-82.
93.
TrattnerW. I. (1999). From poor law to welfare state: A history of social welfare in America (6th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
94.
TrulearH. D. (2007). The seamless garment: Christian identity and professionalism in an era of collaboration. Social Work & Christianity, 34, 317-327.
95.
UnruhH. R.SinhaJ. W.BelcherJ. R. (2010a). “Mainline Protestant and their organizations.” In SchneiderJ. A.MorrisonI. (Eds.), Comparing strategies to maintain connections between faith communities and organizations across religions (Chap. 2; pp. 10-23). College Park: Faith and Organizations Project, University of Maryland.
96.
UnruhH. R.SinhaJ. W.BelcherJ. R. (2010b). Mainline Protestant strategies to maintain connections between faith communities and their nonprofits: Findings from the faith and organizations project. College Park: Faith and Organizations Project, University of Maryland.
97.
VanderwoerdJ. R. (2004). How faith-based social service organizations manage secular pressures associated with government funding. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14, 239-262.
98.
vonFurstenbergG. (2006). Detecting and decomposing the “faith factor” in social-service provision and absorption. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25(3/4), 39-61.
99.
WinstonD. (2000). Red-hot and righteous: The urban religion of The Salvation Army. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100.
WittbergP. (2000). Called to service: The changing institutional identities of American denominations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 357-376.
101.
WittbergP. (2013). Faith-based umbrella organizations: Implications for religious identity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 540–562.
102.
WoodrickA. C. (2006). Preparing the way: Hispanic ministry and community transformation in Marshalltown, Iowa. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 35, 265-294.
103.
WuthnowR. (2004). Saving America? Faith-based services and the future of civil society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
104.
YaghiA. (2009). Is organizational behavior in U.S. Muslim nonprofit institutions religious? An examination of organizational values. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20, 235-249.
105.
ZanisD. A.CnaanR. A. (2006). Social service research and religion: Thoughts about how to measure intervention-based impact. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 25(3/4), 83-104.
