Nonprofit organizations play an essential role in the provision of collective goods. Focusing on a unique subsector in the United States, this study examines the extent to which nonprofit hospitals’ provision of community benefits is related to their revenue streams. Building on existing theories, we postulate that as the proportion of a certain revenue source (i.e., government grants, private contributions, and program fees) increases, its corresponding benefits also increase. Using data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 990 filed by tax-exempt hospitals nationwide, we performed panel data analysis with year and id fixed effects using robust standard errors. The findings show that the proportion of private donations is positively associated with community benefits, whereas that of program income is negatively related to community benefits. Overall, nonprofits’ decision to serve disadvantaged groups and larger communities is associated with their income sources. The study raises implications that are pertinent to nonprofit management, public administration, and health administration.
BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 924-973. doi:10.1177/0899764010380927
2.
BorisE. T.de LeonE.RoegerK. L.NikolovaM. (2010). Human service nonprofits and government collaboration: Findings from the 2010 National Survey of Nonprofit Government contracting and grants (pp. 1-52). Washington, DC: Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, Urban Institute.
BowenW. G.NygrenT. I.TurnerS. E.DuffyE. A. (1994). The charitable nonprofits: An analysis of institutional dynamics and characteristics. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
ChangC. F.TuckmanH. P. (1996). The goods produced by nonprofit organizations. Public Finance Quarterly, 24, 25-43.
FischerR. L.WilskerA.YoungD. R. (2011). Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations: Does it relate to publicness?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 662-681. doi:10.1177/0899764010363921
8.
FismanD. N.LauplandK. B. (2009) The sounds of silence: Public goods, externalities, and the value of infectious disease control programs. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 20, 39-41.
9.
FroelichK. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246-268. doi:10.1177/0899764099283002
Government Accountability Office. (2005). Nonprofit, for-profit, and government hospitals: Uncompensated care and other community benefits. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/120/111707.pdf
12.
HorwitzJ. R. (2005). Making profits and providing care: Comparing nonprofit, for-profit, and government hospitals. Health Affairs, 24, 790-801. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.790
JamesE.YoungD. R. (2007). Fee income and commercial ventures. In YoungD. R. (Ed.), Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice (pp. 93-119). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
15.
JamesJ. (February, 2016). Health affairs health policy brief. In: Nonprofit hospitals’ community benefit requirements.
16.
KapurK.WeisbrodB. A. (2000). The roles of government and nonprofit suppliers in mixed industries. Public Finance Review, 28, 275-308. doi:10.1177/109114210002800401
17.
KimM.PandeyS.PandeyS. K. (2018). Why do nonprofit performing arts organizations offer free public access?Public Administration Review, 78, 139-150. doi:10.1111/puar.12769
18.
LipskyM.SmithS. R. (1989). Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 625-648. doi:10.2307/2151102
19.
OsterS. M. (1998). Executive compensation in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 8, 207-221.
20.
PettijohnS. L.BorisE. T.VitaC. J. D.FyffeS. D. (2013). Nonprofit-government contracts and grants: Findings from the 2013 National Survey (p. 57). Washington, DC: Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, Urban Institute.
21.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
22.
RosenbaumS.KindigD. A.BaoJ.ByrnesM. K.O’LaughlinC. (2015). The value of the nonprofit hospital tax exemption was $24.6 billion in 2011. Health Affairs, 34,1225-1233.
23.
RubinD. B.SinghS. R.JacobsonP. D. (2013). Evaluating hospitals’ provision of community benefit: An argument for an outcome-based approach to nonprofit hospital tax exemption. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 612-616. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301048
24.
SaidelJ. R. (1991). Resource interdependence: The relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 51, 543-553. doi:10.2307/976605
25.
SalamonL. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16, 29-49. doi:10.1177/089976408701600104
26.
SmithS. R. (2017). Cross-sector nonprofit-government financing. In BorisE. T.SteuerleC. E. (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (3rd ed., pp. 103-132). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
SmithS. R.LipskyM. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
SteinbergR. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In PowellW. W.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 117-139). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
United States Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.-a). Instructions for Form 990 and Form 990-EZ: Return of organization exempt from income tax and short form return of organization exempt from income tax. Retrieved from https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999899485902121
31.
United States Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.-b). Instructions for form 990 and form 990-EZ: Return of organization exempt from income tax and short form return of organization exempt from income tax. Retrieved from https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999899485902121
32.
VesterlundL. (2006). Why do people give? In SteinbergR.PowellW. W. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 168-190). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
WeisbrodB. A. (1977). The voluntary nonprofit sector: An economic analysis. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
34.
WeisbrodB. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
WeisbrodB. A. (1998). The nonprofit mission and its financing: Growing links between nonprofits and the rest of the economy. In WeisbrodB. A. (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
36.
WeissmanJ. S.DryfoosP.LondonK. (1999). Income levels of bad-debt and free-care patients in Massachusetts hospitals: Does uncompensated care serve the truly needy?Health Affairs, 18, 156-166.
37.
WilskerA. L.YoungD. R. (2010). How does program composition affect the revenues of nonprofit organizations? Investigating a benefits theory of nonprofit finance. Public Finance Review, 38, 193-216. doi:10.1177/1091142110369238
38.
YoungD. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 149-172. doi:10.1177/0899764000291009
39.
YoungD. R. (2006). Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
YoungD. R. (2007). Toward a normative theory of nonprofit finance. In YoungD. R. (Ed.), Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice (pp. 339-372). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
41.
YoungD. R. (2017). Financing nonprofits and other social enterprises: A benefits approach. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
42.
YoungG. J.ChouC.-H.AlexanderJ.LeeS.-Y. D.RaverE. (2013). Provision of community benefits by tax-exempt US hospitals. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 1519-1527.
