In this article, we evaluate the psychological basis of different forms of volunteering. To date, our knowledge about the relationship between personality and volunteering as an important facet of the social fabric is limited. Applying the Five-Factor Model of Personality (Big Five), we scrutinize this relationship in a comprehensive manner. We consider formal and informal volunteering as well as online volunteering as a new form of social participation. Empirically, we analyze a representative population sample of Switzerland using logistic regression models. We find that extraversion is the most consistent driver of volunteering. The effects of the remaining traits differ across the forms of volunteering. Additional analyses indicate that situational factors may moderate these relationships.
AckermannK.ManatschalA. (2018). Online volunteering as a means to overcome unequal participation? The profiles of online and offline volunteers compared. New Media & Society, 20, 4453-4472.
2.
Amichai-HamburgerY. (2008). Potential and promise of online volunteering. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 544-562.
3.
Amichai-HamburgerY.VinitzkyG. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289-1295.
4.
Amichai-HamburgerY.WainapelG.FoxS. (2002). “On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert”: Extroversion, neuroticism, and internet interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 125-128.
5.
AmielT.SargentS. L. (2004). Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 711-726.
6.
AtkinsR.HartD.DonnellyT. M. (2005). The association of childhood personality type with volunteering during adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 145-162.
7.
BekkersR. (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26, 439-454.
8.
BischofD. (2017). New graphic schemes for Stata: Plotplain and plottig. The Stata Journal, 17, 748-759.
9.
CarloG.OkunM. A.KnightG. P.de GuzmanM. R. T. (2005). The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1293-1305.
10.
CarsonE. D. (1999). On defining and measuring volunteering in the United States and abroad. Law & Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 67-71.
11.
CorreaT.HinsleyA. W.de ZúñigaH. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247-253.
12.
DinesenP. T.NørgaardA. S.KlemmensenR. (2014). The civic personality: Personality and democratic citizenship. Political Studies, 62, 134-152.
13.
FinkelsteinM. A.BrannickM. T. (2007). Applying theories of institutional helping to informal volunteering: Motives, role identity, and prosocial personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35, 101-114.
14.
FinkelsteinM. A.PennerL. A.BrannickM. T. (2005). Motive, role identity, and prosocial personality as predictors of volunteer activity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33, 403-418.
15.
FreitagM.AckermannK. (2016). Direct democracy and institutional trust: Relationships and differences across personality traits. Political Psychology, 37, 707-723.
16.
FreitagM.BauerP. C. (2016). Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers. The Social Science Journal, 53, 467-476.
17.
FunderD. C. (2008). Persons, situations and person-situation interactions. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 568-580). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M. (2011). The Big Five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265-287.
19.
GerlitzJ.-Y.SchuppJ. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP [On measuring the Big Five personality traits in the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP)] (DIW Research Notes 4). Retrieved from http://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.43490.de/rn4.pdf
20.
GesthuizenM.ScheepersP. (2012). Educational differences in volunteering in cross-national perspective: Individual and contextual explanations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 58-81.
21.
HamburgerY. A.Ben-ArtziE. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441-449.
22.
JaccardJ.JacobyJ. (2009). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
25.
LeeY.BrudneyJ. L. (2012). Participation in formal and informal volunteering: Implications for volunteer recruitment. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23, 159-180.
26.
MarkG.GanzachY. (2014). Personality and Internet usage: A large-scale representative study of young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 274-281.
27.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159-181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
MondakJ. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MukherjeeD. (2011). Participation of older adults in virtual volunteering: A qualitative analysis. Ageing International, 36, 253-266.
30.
MusickM. A.WilsonJ. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). How’s life? 2015: Measuring well-being. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/how_life-2015-en
32.
OkunM. A.PuglieseJ.RookK. S. (2007). Unpacking the relation between extraversion and volunteering in later life: The role of social capital. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1467-1477.
33.
OmotoA. M.SnyderM.HackettJ. D. (2010). Personality and motivational antecedents of activism and civic engagement. Journal of Personality, 78, 1703-1734.
34.
OrchardL. J.FullwoodC. (2010). Current perspectives on personality and Internet use. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 155-169.
35.
QuintelierE.TheocharisY. (2013). Online political engagement, Facebook, and personality traits. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 280-290.
RussoS.AmnåE. (2016). The personality divide: Do personality traits differentially predict online political engagement?Social Science Computer Review, 34, 259-277.
38.
SmithD. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263.
39.
Stadelmann-SteffenI.FreitagM. (2010). Making civil society work: Models of democracy and their impact on civic engagement. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 526-551.
40.
WeinschenkA. (2013). ’Cause you’ve got personality: Political participation and the tendency to join civic groups. SAGE Open, 3. doi:10.1177/2158244013508418
41.
WilsonJ. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.
42.
WilsonJ. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 176-212.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
