In this article, we analyze two landmark reviews of British voluntary action to cast a critical gaze on the recurrent claim that voluntarism is facing a new era of ever more turbulent welfare systems and dramatic changes in state–voluntary relations. Rather than representing a new era, we find the current climate may be more accurately considered a collage of past relations. By this, we mean a composition of reality that assembles different aspects of past realities to create a seemingly new era. This suggests that conventional discursive institutional accounts of policy change, which downplay the interrelated dynamics of stability and change, are inadequate for explaining the evolution of state–voluntary relations specifically and policy reform more broadly. Debates about public policy and the role to be played by voluntary action among scholarly and practitioner communities would be better served by greater understanding of the historical experience that has formed today’s institutions.
AlcockP. (2011). Voluntary action, New Labour and the “third sector.” In HiltonM.McKayJ. (Eds.), The ages of voluntarism: How we got to the big society (pp. 158-179). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlcockP.KendallJ. (2011). Constituting the third sector: Processes of decontenstation and contention under the UK Labour governments in England. Voluntas, 22, 450-469.
3.
BeveridgeW. H. B. (1942). Social insurance and allied services (Report by Sir William Beveridge). London, England: The Stationery Office.
4.
BeveridgeW. H. B. (1944). Full employment in a free society. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
5.
BeveridgeW. H. B. (1948). Voluntary action: A report on methods of social advance. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
6.
BovairdT. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67, 846-860.
7.
BrownA. D.AinsworthS.GrantD. (2012). The rhetoric of institutional change. Organization Studies, 33, 297-321.
8.
BulmerM. (1987). The social basis of community care. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
9.
CouleT. M.BennettE. (2016). Rhetoric, organizational category dynamics and institutional change: A study of the UK welfare state. Public Administration, 94, 1059-1076. doi:10.1111/padm.12274
10.
CouleT. M.PatmoreB. (2013). Institutional logics, institutional work, and public service innovation in non-profit organizations. Public Administration, 91, 980-997.
11.
CrowsonN.HiltonM.McKayJ. (2009). NGOs in contemporary Britain: Non-state actors in society and politics since 1945. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
Deakin Commission. (1996). Meeting the challenge of change: Voluntary action into the 21st century, report of the Commission on the Future of the Voluntary Sector in England. London, England: National Council for Voluntary Organisations.
13.
ErikssonK. (2012). Self-service society: Participative politics and new forms of governance. Public Administration, 90, 685-698.
14.
FairbrassJ. (2011). Exploring corporate social responsibility policy in the European Union: A discursive institutionalist analysis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, 949-970.
15.
FinlaysonG. (1994). Citizen, state and social welfare in Britain 1830-1990. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
GrantP. (2011). Voluntarism and the impact of the First World War. In HiltonM.McKayJ. (Eds.), The ages of voluntarism: How we got to the big society (pp. 27-46). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
GrantP. (2014). Philanthropy and voluntary action in the First World War: Mobilizing charity. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
GrimshawD.RuberyJ. (2012). The end of the UK’s liberal collectivist social model? The implications of the Coalition Government’s policy during the austerity crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 105-126.
19.
HarrisJ. (1990). Society and the state in twentieth century Britain. In ThompsonF. M. L. (Ed.), The Cambridge social history of Britain 1750-1950 (Vol. 3). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HiltonM.McKayJ. (2011). The Ages of voluntarism: An introduction. In HiltonM.McKayJ. (Eds.), The ages of voluntarism: How we got to the big society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
HiltonM.McKayJ.CrowsonN.MouhotJ.-F. (2013). The politics of expertise: How NGOs shaped modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
HoodC.JacksonM. W. (1991). Administrative argument (Vol. 5). Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
23.
HopeM.RaudlaR. (2012). Discursive institutionalism and policy stasis in simple and compound polities: The cases of Estonian fiscal policy and United States climate change policy. Policy Studies, 33, 399-418.
24.
KendallJ.KnappM. (1996). The voluntary sector in the UK. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
25.
KnightB. (1993). Voluntary action: The Centris report. Newcastle, UK: Centris.
26.
KuismaM. (2013). Understanding welfare crises: The role of ideas. Public Administration, 91, 797-805.
27.
LewisJ. (1996). The boundary between voluntary and statutory social service in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Historical Journal, 39, 155-177.
28.
MacadamE. (1934). The New Philanthropy: A study of the relations between the statutory and voluntary social services. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
29.
MaguireS.HardyC. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 148-178.
30.
MarshallT. H. (1949). Voluntary action. The Political Quarterly, 20, 25-36.
31.
MilbourneL.CushmanM. (2013). From the third sector to the big society: How changing UK Government policies have eroded third sector trust. Voluntas, 24, 485-508.
32.
NickelP.EikenberryA. (2016). Knowing and governing: The mapping of the nonprofit and voluntary sector as statecraft. Voluntas, 27, 392-408.
33.
OppenheimerM.DeakinN. (2011). Introduction. In OppenheimerM.DeakinN. (Eds.), Beveridge and voluntary action in Britain and the wider British world Manchester (pp. 1-8). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
34.
Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary Sector. (2012). Protecting independence: The voluntary sector in 2012. London, England: The Baring Foundation.
35.
Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary Sector. (2013). Independence under threat: The voluntary sector in 2013. London, England: The Baring Foundation.
36.
Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary Sector. (2014). Independence undervalued: The voluntary sector in 2014. London, England: The Baring Foundation.
37.
Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary Sector. (2015). An independent mission: The voluntary sector in 2015. London, England: The Baring Foundation.
38.
Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary Sector. (2017). An independent mission: The voluntary sector in 2015. London, England: The Baring Foundation.
39.
PennA. (2011). Social History and Organizational Development: Revisiting Beveridge’s Voluntary Action. In RochesterC.GoslingG.PennA.ZimmeckM. (Eds.), Understanding the roots of voluntary action (pp. 17-29). Eastbourne, UK: Sussex Academic Press.
40.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT. B.HardyC. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635-652.
41.
RochesterC. (2014, January13). Revisiting the roots of voluntary action. A paper presented to a Voluntary Action History Society Seminar held on 13th January 2014 at the Institute for Historical Research, London.
42.
SchmidtV. A. (2011). Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies, 5, 106-126.
43.
6P.LeatD. (1997). Inventing the British voluntary sector by committee: From Wolfenden to Deakin. Non-Profit Studies, 1, 33-47.
44.
StassonK. R.GisalsonM.LeroyP. (2010). Impact of environmental discourses on public health policy arrangements: A comparative study in the UK and Flanders (Belgium). Public Health, 124, 581-592.
45.
TillyC. (2005). Social movements, 1768-2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
46.
TitmussR. (1964). The limits of the welfare state. New Left Review, 27, 28-37.
47.
WebbS.WebbB. (1912). The prevention of destitution. London, England: Longmans, Green and Company.
48.
WolchJ. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York, NY: Foundation Center.
49.
Wolfenden Committee. (1978). The future of voluntary organisations: Report of the Wolfenden committee. London, England: Croom Helm.
