Numerous studies have found women to be more public spirited than men, volunteering more and giving a larger share of their income to nonprofits. Yet in the theoretical literature on the nonprofit sector, the role of women has been largely neglected. This article uses cross-national data to examine the relationship between women's empowerment, voluntary action and the nonprofit sector. I find a strong and positive relationship between women's empowerment, voluntary action, and nonprofit sector strength. These findings suggest a need for a gender theory that offers new insights into the nonprofit sector. If policy makers intensify their efforts to promote women's empowerment, this could not only increase equity but may strengthen the nonprofit sector. This, in a virtuous circle, could further help to promote women's empowerment.
Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 116, 293-312.
2.
Bolton, G.E., & Katok, E. (1995). An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economics Letters, 48, 287-292.
3.
Capek, M.E.S. (2005). Documenting women's giving: Biases, barriers and benefits. In E. Clift (Ed.), Women, philanthropy, and social change: Visions for a just society (pp. 29-60). Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.
4.
Clift, E. (Ed.). (2005). Women, philanthropy, and social change: Visions for a just society. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.
5.
Conry, J.C., & McDonald, J.E. (1994). Moving toward a matrix: Gender and the nonprofit culture of the nineties. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 5, 45-53.
6.
Corbin, J.J. (1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 28, 296-314.
7.
Dekker, P., & van den Broek, A. (1998). Civil society in comparative perspective: Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas, 9(1), 11-38.
8.
DiMaggio, P. & Louch, H. (1997). Who volunteers? Dominant and relevant statuses . Washington, DC: Aspen Institute; Nonprofit Sector Research Fund.
9.
Douglas, J. (1987). Political theories of nonprofit organization. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 43-54). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Eagly, A.H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin , 100, 283-308.
11.
Eckel, C.C., & Grossman, P.J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal , 108, 726-735.
12.
Gaskin, K. & Smith, J.D. (1997). A new civil Europe? A study of the extent and role of volunteering. London: The National Center for Volunteering.
13.
Gibelman, M. (2000). The nonprofit sector and gender discrimination: A preliminary investigation into the glass ceiling. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10, 251-269.
14.
Grønbjerg, K.A., & Paarlberg, L. (2001). Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 684-706.
Havens, J.J., O'Herlihy, M.A., & Schervish, P.G. (2006). Charitable giving: How much, by whom, to what, and how. In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 542-567) New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Hodgkinson, V.A. (1995). Key factors influencing caring, involvement, and community. In P. G. Schervish, V. A. Hodgkinson, M. Gates, et al. (Eds.), Care and community in modern society: Passing on the tradition of service to future generations (pp. 21-50). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
18.
Hodgkinson, V.A., & Weitzman, M.S. (1990, 1992, 1994 , 1996). Dimensions of the independent sector: A statistical profile. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
19.
James, E. (1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective . In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector (pp. 397-415). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Kirsh, A.D., Hume, K.M., & Jalnadoni, N.T. (1999). Giving and volunteering in the United States: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
21.
McCarthy, K. D. (Ed.). (2001). Women, philanthropy and civil society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
McPherson, J.M., & Rotolo, T. (1996). Diversity and change in voluntary groups. American Sociological Review, 61, 179-202.
23.
Mesch, D.J., Rooney, P.M., Kathryn, W.C., & Steinberg, S. (2002, Fall). Race and gender differences in philanthropy: Indiana as a test case. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising , 37, 65-77.
24.
Mirvis, P.H. (1992). The quality of employment in the nonprofit sector: An update on employee attitudes in nonprofits versus business and government . Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3(1), 23-41.
25.
Moore, G., & Whitt, J.A. (2000). Gender and networks in a local voluntary-sector elite. Voluntas, 11, 309-330.
26.
Mörtvik, R., & Spånt, R. (2005, July). Does gender equality spur growth? OECD Observer, 250, 14-16.
27.
Negrey, C. (1993). Gender, time and reduced work. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
Odendahl, T. (1990). Charity begins at home: Generosity and self-interest among the philanthropic elite. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Ostrander, S.A. (2004). Moderating contradictions of feminist philanthropy: Women's community organizations and the Boston Women's Fund, 1995 to 2000 . Gender and Society, 18(1), 29-46.
30.
Ostrower, F. (1995). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Petrzelka, P., & Mannon, S.E. (2006). Keepin' this little town going: Gender and volunteerism in rural America. Gender and Society, 20, 236-258.
32.
Preston, A.E. (1989). The nonprofit worker in a for-profit world. Journal of Labor Economics, 7, 438-463.
33.
Powell, W. W., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.). (2006). The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
35.
Saidel, J.R., & Loscocco, K. (2005). Agency Leaders, Gendered Institutions, and Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 65, 158-170.
36.
Salamon, L.M. (1987). Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-Nonprofit relations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The independent sector: A research handbook (pp. 99-117). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
Salamon, L.M., & Anheier, H.K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9, 213-248.
38.
Salamon, L.M., Anheier, H.K., List, R., Toepler, S., Sokolowski, S.W., et al. (1999). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
39.
Sokolowski, S.W. (1996). Show me the way to the worthy deed: Towards a microstructure theory of volunteering and giving. Voluntas , 7, 259-278.
40.
Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y. & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25-55.
41.
Taniguchi, H. (2006). Men's and women's volunteering: Gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 83-101.
42.
Teorell, J., Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (2008). The quality of government dataset (version 7Jan08) . Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University-The Quality of Government Institute.
43.
Weisbrod, B.A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.
45.
Wilson, J. & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.
46.
Wollebæk, D. & Selle, P. (2004). The role of women in the transformation of the organizational society in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 120S-144S.
47.
World Values Survey. (2006). European and world values surveys: Four-wave integrated data file, 1981-2004, v.20060423. Tilburg, Netherlands: European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association.
48.
Young, D.R. (1983). If not for profit, for what?Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
