Household Charitable Giving at the Intersection of Gender,Marital Status,and Religion

Abstract

Past research reveals mixed results regarding the relationship between gender and charitable giving. We show gender plays a significant role in giving but only when considered alongside marital status and religion. Using the 2006 Portraits of American Life Study, we model a household’s propensity to give and the amount given. We extend past research by disaggregating unmarried households to look at divorced, widowed, and never-married households, and by including multiple religion measures. Results indicate households headed by never-married females have lower giving levels compared with those headed by divorced and widowed women. In households headed by single males, these differences are largely absent. Religious attendance has a stronger association with giving in male-headed households. The respondent’s gender is also related to the amount married households report giving to charity. Future research on giving should consider both gender and marital status to more fully capture increasing diversity in American families.

Keywords

marital status gender differences religion charitable giving

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreoni

Brown

Rischall

(2003). Charitable giving by married couples: Who decides and why does it matter? The Journal of Human Resources, 38, 111-133.

Bekkers

Schuyt

(2008). And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands. Review of Religious Research, 50, 74-96.

Bekkers

Wiepking

(2011). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving—Part one: Religion, education, age and socialisation. Voluntary Sector Review, 2, 337-365.

Bianchi

S. M.

Milkie

M. A.

(2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 705-725.

Blundell

Meghir

(1987). Bivariate alternatives to the Tobit model. Journal of Econometrics, 34, 179-200.

Bonke

(2015). Pooling of income and sharing of consumption within households. Review of Economics of the Household, 13, 73-93.

Brines

Joyner

(1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-355.

Brown

S. L.

Bulanda

J. R.

Lee

G. R.

(2012). Transitions into and out of cohabitation in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 774-793.

Brown

S. L.

Lin

I.-F.

Hammersmith

A. M.

Wright

M. R.

(2016). Later life marital dissolution and repartnership status: A national portrait. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, gbw051. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw051

10.

Burkhauser

Duncan

(1989). Economic risks of gender roles: Income loss and life events over the life course. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 3-23.

11.

Chaves

(1999). Financing American religion. In Chaves

Miller

(Eds.), Financing American religion (pp. 169-188). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

12.

Civettini

N. H. W.

Glass

(2008). The impact of religious conservatism on men’s work and family involvement. Gender & Society, 22, 172-193.

13.

Cook

R. D.

(1979). Influential observations in linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 169-174.

14.

Cotter

Hermsen

J. M.

Vanneman

(2011). The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 259-289.

15.

Darnell

Sherkat

D. E.

(1997). The impact of protestant fundamentalism on educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 62, 306-315.

16.

De Wit

Bekkers

. (2016). Exploring gender differences in charitable giving: The Dutch case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 741-761.

17.

Eagly

A. H.

(2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. The American Psychologist, 64, 644-658.

18.

Einolf

C. J.

(2011). Gender differences in the correlates of volunteering and charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 1092-1112.

19.

Einolf

C. J.

Philbrick

(2014). Generous or greedy marriage? A longitudinal study of volunteering and charitable giving. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 573-586.

20.

Einolf

C. J.

Philbrick

D. M.

Slay

(2013). National giving campaigns in the United States: Entertainment, empathy, and the national peer group. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 241-261.

21.

Ellison

C. G.

Bartkowski

J. P.

(2002). Conservative Protestantism and the division of household labor among married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 950-985.

22.

Emerson

M. O.

Sikkink

(2006). Portraits of American life study, 1st wave, 2006.

23.

Glass

Jacobs

(2005). Childhood religious conservatism and adult attainment among Black and White women. Social Forces, 84, 555-579.

24.

Hoffmann

J. P.

Bartkowski

J. P.

(2008). Gender, religious tradition and biblical literalism. Social Forces, 86, 1245-1272.

25.

Hoge

D. R.

Yang

(1994). Determinants of religious giving in American denominations: Data from two nationwide surveys. Review of Religious Research, 36, 123-148.

26.

Iannaccone

L. R.

Finke

Stark

(1997). Deregulating religion: The economics of church and state. Economic Inquiry, 35, 350-364.

27.

James

R. N.

Sharpe

D. L.

(2007a). The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 218-238.

28.

James

R. N.

Sharpe

D. L.

(2007b). The “sect effect” in charitable giving: Distinctive realities of exclusively religious charitable givers. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66, 697-726.

29.

Keister

L. A.

(2003). Religion and wealth: The role of religious affiliation and participation in early adult asset accumulation. Social Forces, 82, 175-207.

30.

Keister

L. A.

(2008). Conservative protestants and wealth: How religion perpetuates asset poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1237-1271.

31.

Keister

L. A.

(2011). Religion and attainment. Sociological Focus, 44, 354-383.

32.

Kennedy

Mercer

Keeter

Hatley

Mcgeeney

Gimenez

(2016). Evaluating online nonprobability surveys. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

33.

Kennedy

Ruggles

(2014). Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography, 51, 587-598.

34.

Kruschke

J. K.

(2010). What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 293-300.

35.

Lehrer

E. L.

(2004). Religion as a determinant of economic and demographic behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 30, 707-726.

36.

Leung

S. F.

(1996). On the choice between sample selection and two-part models. Journal of Econometrics, 72, 197-229.

37.

Lewis

V. A.

MacGregor

C. A.

Putnam

R. D.

(2013). Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42, 331-346.

38.

Lindsay

D. M.

Gallup

(2000). Surveying the religious landscape: Trends in U.S. beliefs. New York, NY: Moorhouse Publishing.

39.

McLanahan

Percheski

(2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 257-276.

40.

Mesch

D. J.

(2010). Women give 2010: New research about women and giving. Indianapolis, IN: The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.

41.

Mesch

D. J.

Rooney

P. M.

Steinberg

K. S.

Denton

(2006). The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 565-587.

42.

Read

J. G.

Oselin

(2008). Gender and the education-employment paradox in ethnic and religious contexts: The case of Arab Americans. American Sociological Review, 73, 296-313.

43.

Rooney

P. M.

Mesch

D. J.

Chin

Steinberg

K. S.

(2005). The effects of race, gender, and survey methodologies on giving in the US. Economics Letters, 86, 173-180.

44.

Saroglou

Pichon

Trompette

Verschueren

Dernelle

(2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 323-348.

45.

Schafer

M. H.

(2015). Religiously traditional, unusually supportive? Examining who gives, helps, and advises in Americans’ close networks. Social Currents, 2, 81-104.

46.

Schrock

Schwalbe

(2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277-295.

47.

Sherkat

D. E.

(2002). Sexuality and religious commitment in the United States: An empirical examination. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 313-323.

48.

Sherkat

D. E.

Darnell

(1999). The effect of parents’ fundamentalism on children’s educational attainment: Examining differences by gender and children’s fundamentalism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 23-35.

49.

Showers

V. E.

Showers

L. S.

Beggs

J. M.

Cox

J. E.

(2011). Charitable giving expenditures and the faith factor. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70, 152-186.

50.

Smock

P. J.

(2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20.

51.

Steensland

Park

J. Z.

Regnerus

M. D.

Robinson

L. D.

Wilcox

W. B.

Woodberry

R. D.

(2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291-318.

52.

Strawbridge

W. J.

Shema

S. J.

Cohen

R. D.

Kaplan

G. A.

(2001). Religious attendance increases survival by improving and maintaining good health behaviors, mental health, and social relationships. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23, 68-74.

53.

Stryker

Burke

P. J.

(2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284-297.

54.

Teachman

Paasch

K. M.

(1994). Financial impact of divorce on children and their families. The Future of Children, 4, 63-83.

55.

Tobin

(1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24-36.

56.

Treas

(1993). Money in the bank: Transaction costs and the economic organization of marriage. American Sociological Review, 58, 723-734.

57.

Umberson

Crosnoe

Reczek

(2010). Social relationships and health behavior across the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 139-157.

58.

Vaidyanathan

Hill

J. P.

Smith

(2011). Religion and charitable financial giving to religious and secular causes: Does political ideology matter? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 450-469.

59.

Vaidyanathan

Snell

(2011). Motivations for and obstacles to religious financial giving. Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review, 72, 189-214.

60.

Vespa

Lewis

J. M.

Kreider

R. M.

(2013). America’s families and living arrangements: 2012 population characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

61.

Wiepking

Bekkers

(2012). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving—Part two: Gender, family composition and income. Voluntary Sector Review, 3, 217-245.

62.

Wilhelm

M. O.

(2006). New data on charitable giving in the PSID. Economics Letters, 92, 26-31.

63.

Wilhelm

M. O.

(2008). Practitioners’ corner: Practical considerations for choosing between Tobit and SCLS or CLAD estimators for censored regression models with an application to charitable giving. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 559-582.

64.

Wilmer

W. K.

(1995). Evangelicals: Linking fervency for faith and generosity of giving. In Hamilton

C. H.

Illchman

W. F.

(Eds.), Cultures of giving: How region and religion influence philanthropy (pp. 101-116). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

65.

Winship

Mare

R. D.

(1992). Models for sample selection bias. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 327-350.

66.

Women’s Philanthropy Institute. (2015). Do women give more? Indianapolis, IN: Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.

67.

Women’s Philanthropy Institute. (2016). Womengive 16: Giving in young adulthood: Gender differences and changing patterns across the generations. Indianapolis, IN: Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.

68.

Yörük

B. K.

(2010). Charitable giving by married couples revisited. The Journal of Human Resources, 45, 497-516.