Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The U-shaped income-giving profile, where those in the lower and higher income brackets give higher percentages of their income to charity, has been the subject of much dispute. Examining data from 16,442 households, the authors find clear evidence of a U-shaped relationship. Previous findings contradicting the U-shaped profile are shown to suffer from selection bias that systematically deflates reported lower-income giving levels. Although the U-shaped profile is an appropriate descriptor, it does not reflect typical household behavior. Instead, it is driven almost entirely by the 5% of households that contribute one tenth or more of their after-tax income. Traditionally, the presence of so many highly committed, low-income households has been attributed to religious sect affiliation by the poor. The authors find an additional explanation in that these highly committed, lower-income households are dramatically wealthier than other members of their income classification, in part reflecting the presence of lower-income, higher-asset, retirement-aged households.

Keywords

philanthropy nonprofit religion charitable giving consumer expenditure survey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AAFRC Trust For Philanthropy. (2005). Giving USA 2005: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2005 . Glenview, IL: Author.

Andreoni, J. , & Scholz, J.K. (1998). An econometric analysis of charitable giving with interdependent preferences. Economic Inquiry, 36, 410-428.

Auten, G.E. , Clotfelter, C.T. , & Schmalbeck, R.L. (2000). Taxes and philanthropy among the wealthy. In J. Slemrod (Ed.), Does atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich (pp. 392-424). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

Bradley, R. , Holden, S. , & McClelland, R. (2005). A robust estimation of the effects of taxation on charitable contributions. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(4), 545-554.

Brooks, A.C. (2002). Welfare receipt and private charity. Public Budgeting and Financing, 22(3), 101-114.

Brooks, A.C. (2004). The effects of public policy on private charity . Administration & Society, 36, 166-185.

Clotfelter, C.T. , & Steuerle, C.E. (1981). Charitable contributions . In H. Aaron & J. Pechman (Eds.), How taxes affect economic behavior (pp. 403-437). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Congressional Budget Office. (2002, December). Effects of allowing nonitemizers to deduct charitable contributions . Washington, DC: Author.

Davis, J.A. , Smith, T.W. , & Marsden, P.V. (2005). General social surveys, 1972-2004 (cumulative file) [Computer file] Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

10.

Hodgkinson, V.A. , & Weitzman, M.S. (1990). Giving and volunteering in the United States: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.

11.

Hrung, W.B. (2004). After-life consumption and charitable giving. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(3), 731-745.

12.

Iannaccone, L. (1988). A formal model of church and sect. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S241-S268.

13.

Kochen, M. (1989). The small world. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.

14.

Ostrower, F. (1995). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

15.

Paulin, G.D. , & Ferraro, D.L. (1994). Imputing income in the Consumer Expenditure Survey . Monthly Labor Review, 117(12),23-32.

16.

Presser, H.B. (1998). Decapitating the US Census Bureau's “head of household”: Feminist mobilization in the 1970s. Feminist Economics, 4(3), 145-158.

17.

Reece, W.S. (1979). Charitable contributions: New evidence on household behavior. American Economic Review, 69, 142-151.

18.

Reece, W.S. , & Zieschang, K. (1985). Consistent estimation of the impact of tax deductibility on the level of charitable contributions. Econometrica, 53(2), 271-294.

19.

Reed, P.B. , & Selbee, L.K. (2001). The civic core in Canada: Disproportionality in charitable giving, volunteering, and civic participation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 761-780.

20.

Savoie, A.J. , & Havens, J.J. (1998, November). The high giving poor: Who are the low income people who make high contributions? Presented at the 1998 annual meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Seattle, WA.

21.

Schervish, P.G. , & Havens, J.J. (1995a). Do the poor pay more? Is the U-shaped curve correct? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 79-90.

22.

Schervish, P.G. , & Havens, J.J. (1995b). Explaining the curve in the U-shaped curve. Voluntas, 6, 203—225.

23.

Schervish, P.G. , & Havens, J.J. (1998). Money and magnanimity: New findings on the distribution of income, wealth, and philanthropy. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 8(4), 421-434.

24.

Schervish, P.G. , & Havens, J.J. (2001). Wealth and the commonwealth: New findings on where-withal and philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 30(1), 5-25.

25.

U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2001: Interview survey and detailed expenditure files, ICPSR release [Computer file]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics [Producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor] .

26.

Van Slyke, D.M. , & Brooks, A.C. (2005). Why do people give? New evidence and strategies for nonprofit managers. American Review of Public Administration , 35(3), 199-222.

The Nature and Causes of the U-Shaped Charitable Giving Profile

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References