Free Clinics (FCs) in the United States contribute to the healthcare safety net by providing care to a variety of populations including the uninsured. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to evaluate FC performance by examining clinic funding sources and the number of visits and prescriptions provided on an annual basis. Cross-sectional data including 48 Virginia FCs in 2010 are analyzed to distinguish efficient and inefficient FCs. In all, 30 clinics (62.5%) were found to be top performers and defined the efficiency frontier, whereas 18 clinics (37.5%) were evaluated as inefficient. On average, to obtain efficiency, inefficient clinics would annually need to increase the number of provided general medical visits by 2,183, specialty visits by 1,969, other visits by 1,495, and dispensed prescriptions by 7,305. These findings have implications for healthcare policy and FC management.
BrandeauM.SainfortF.PierskallaW. (Eds.). (2004). Operations research and health care: A handbook of methods and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-8066-2_7
2.
BrownW. A.HillmanA. J.OkunM. A. (2012). Factors that influence monitoring and resource provision among nonprofit board members. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 145-156.
CooperW.SeifordL.ToneK. (2006). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed., pp. 116). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
5.
CorredoiraR. A.ChilingerianJ. A.KimberlyJ. R. (2011). Analyzing performance in addiction treatment: An application of data envelopment analysis to the state of Maryland system. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.01.006
6.
DarnellJ. (2010). Free clinics in the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170, 946-953.
7.
GellerS.TaylorB. M.ScottH. D. (2004). Free clinics helping to patch the safety net. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 15(1), 42-51.
8.
GertzA.FrankS.BlixenC. (2011). A survey of patients and providers at free clinics across the United States. Journal of Community Health, 36, 83-93. doi:10.1007/s10900-010-9286-x
9.
HallM. (2011). The mission of safety net organizations following national insurance reform. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 802-805. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1654-4
10.
HermanR. D.RenzD. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 107-126.
11.
IyengarR. N.OzcanY. A. (2009). Performance evaluation of ambulatory surgery centres: An efficiency approach. Health Services Management Research: An Official Journal of the Association of University Programs in Health Administration, 22(4), 184-190. doi:10.1258/hsmr.2009.009008
12.
Jerome-D’EmiliaB.SupleeP. D. (2012). The ACA and the undocumented. American Journal of Nursing, 112(4), 21-27.
13.
KompK.Van TilburgT.van GroenouM. B. (2012). Age, retirement, and health as factors in volunteering in later life. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 280-299.
14.
LewinM. E.AltmanS. (Eds.). (2000). America’s health care safety net, intact but endangered. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
NadkarniM. M.PhilbrickJ. T. (2003). Free clinics and the uninsured: The increasing demands of chronic illness. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 14(2), 165-174.
16.
North Carolina Association of Free Clinics. (2011). 2011 Annual outcomes report: Improving the health and well-being of the uninsured in North Carolina. Winston Salem, NC.
17.
NotaroS.KhanM.BryanN.KimC.OsuneroT.SensengM.. . .NasaruddinM. (2012). Analysis of the demographic characteristics and medical conditions of the uninsured utilizing a free clinic. Journal of Community Health, 37, 501-506. doi:10.1007/s10900-011-9470-7
18.
O’NeillL.RaunerM.HeidenbergerK.KrausM. (2008). A cross-national comparison and taxonomy of DEA-based hospital efficiency studies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 158-189. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2007.03.001
19.
OzcanY. A. (2008). Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation. An assessment using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
20.
OzcanY. A.CotterJ. J. (1994). An assessment of efficiency of area agencies on aging in Virginia through data envelopment analysis. The Gerontologist, 34, 363-370.
21.
RyskinaK. L.MeahY. S.ThomasD. C. (2009). Quality of diabetes care at a student-run free clinic. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 20, 969-981. doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0231
22.
TennantF. S.Jr.DayC. M. (1974). Survival potential and quality of care among free clinics. Public Health Reports, 89, 558-562.
23.
TylerL.OzcanY.WogenS. (1995). Technical efficiency of community mental health centers. Journal of Medical Systems, 19, 413-423.
24.
Virginia Association of Free and Charitable Clinics. (2011). Virginia Association of Free Clinics: 2011 membership renewal and annual survey reflecting calendar year 2010 statistics (Membership Renewal and Annual Survey) Richmond, VA.
25.
WeissG. (2006). Grassroots medicine. The story of America’s free health clinics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
YehJ.WhiteK. R.OzcanY. A. (1997). Efficiency evaluation of community-based youth services in Virginia. Community Mental Health Journal, 33, 487-499.
27.
ZuckerJ.GillenJ.AckrivoJ.SchroederR.KellerS. (2011). Hypertension management in a student-run free clinic: Meeting national standards?Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 86, 239-245. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820465e0
