Based on a large-scale philanthropic survey conducted in California, this paper empirically examines the determinants of ethnic giving versus mainstream giving practices and the interactive relationships between the two observed among foreign-born Korean immigrants. The results of our bivariate probit regression analysis suggest several interesting findings. First, acculturation serves significant functions in immigrants’ decisions to give to mainstream organizations, but does not appear to affect ethnic giving decisions as profoundly. Second, U.S. educational experiences and gender are strong predictors of mainstream giving practices, whereas household incomes and religiosity figure significantly in terms of explaining ethnic giving practices. Additionally, citizenship is related weakly to ethnic giving practices. Finally, two distinctive giving practices are negatively interrelated, meaning that immigrants who donate to ethnic organizations are less likely to give to mainstream organizations, and vice versa.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2.
AndreoniJ.BrownE.RischallI. (2003). Charitable giving by married couples: Who decides and why does it matter?Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), 111-133.
3.
BerryJ. W.KimU.MindeT.MokD. (1987). Comparative studies of acculturative stress. International Migration Review, 21, 491-511.
4.
BerryJ. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In ChunK.M.OrganistaP.B.MarinG. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 17-38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
BrooksA. C. (2005). Does social capital make you generous?Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 1-15.
6.
BrownE. (1999). Patterns and purposes of philanthropic giving. In ClotfelterC. T.EhrlichT. (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector (pp. 212-230). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
BrownE.FerrisJ. M. (2007). Social capital and philanthropy: An analysis of the impact of social capital on individual giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 85-99.
8.
BryantW. K.Jeon-SlaughterH.KangH.TaxA. (2003). Participating in philanthropic activities: Donating money and time. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(1), 43-73.
9.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
CarsonE. D. (2000, Fall). The new rules for engaging donors of color: Giving in the twenty-first century. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 29, 69-80.
11.
ChaoJ. (1999). Asian-American philanthropy: Expanding circles of participation. In Cultures of caring: Philanthropy in diverse American communities (pp. 197-253). Washington, DC: Special report funded by the Ford Foundation, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and the Council on Foundations.
12.
ChaoJ. (2001). Asian-American philanthropy: Acculturation and charitable vehicles. In RogersP. C. (Ed) Philanthropy in Communities of Color: Traditions and Challenges (pp. 57-79). Indianapolis: ARNOVA.
13.
DeckerP.UslanerE. M. (2001). Social capital and participation in everyday life. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
DillmanD. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
15.
FreyB. S.MeierS. (2005). Selfish and indoctrinated economists?European Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 165-71
16.
FrumkinP. (2006). Strategic giving: The art and science of giving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
FukuyamaF. (1993). Immigrants and family values. Commentary, 95(5), 26-32.
18.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78, 1360-1380.
19.
GreeneW. H. (2007). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
GittellR.TebaldiE. (2006). Charitable giving: Factors influencing giving in U.S. states. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 721-736
21.
GittellR.VidalA. (1998) Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Giving USA. (2009). Giving USA: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2008. A publication giving USA foundation, researched and written by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
23.
GordonM. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
HandyF., & Greenspan. (2009). Immigrant volunteering: A stepping stone to integration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 956-982.
25.
HodgkinsonV. A. (2002). Individual giving and volunteering. In SalamonL. M. (Eds.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 387-420). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
26.
HodgkinsonV. A.WeitzmanM. (1996) Giving and volunteering in the United States. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
27.
JanoskiT.MusickM.WilsonJ. (1998). Being volunteered? The impact of social participation and pro-social attitudes on volunteering. Sociological Forum, 13, 495-519.
28.
JohnsonA. S. (2011). Korean American philanthropy: Traditions, trends, and potential. San Francisco, CA: Give2Asia.
29.
LeeY.MoonS. (2011). Mainstream and ethnic volunteering by Korean immigrants in the United States. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 811-830.
30.
LeviM. (1996, March). Social and unsocial capital: A review essay of Robert Putnam’s making democracy work. Politics & Society, 24, 45-55
31.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MathurA. (1996). Older adults’ motivations for gift giving to charitable organizations: An exchange theory perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 13(1), 107-123.
33.
MeschD. J.RooneyP. M.SteinbergK. S.DentonB. (2006). The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 565-587.
34.
MillsR. S.PedersenJ.GrusecJ. E. (1989). Sex differences in reasoning and emotion about altruism. Sex Roles, 20, 603-621
35.
MinP. G. (1992). The structure and social functions of Korean immigrant churches in the United States. International Migration Review, 26, 1370-1394.
36.
MinP.G. (2001). Changes in Korean immigrants’ gender role and social status, and their marital conflicts. Sociological Forum, 16, 301-320.
37.
MoonS. (2009, November19-21). Acculturation, resources, and formal charitable donation: The case of foreign-born Korean immigrants in the United States. Paper presented at the 38th Association for Research on Nonprofit Organization and Voluntary Action Conference, Cleveland, OH.
38.
MoonS. (2010, November18-20). Ethnic giving versus mainstream giving practices by foreign-born Korean immigrants. Paper presented at the 39th Association for Research on Nonprofit Organization and Voluntary Action Conference, Alexandria, VA.
39.
MoonS.DowneyM. (2010). Philanthropic motives: The “who” and “why” of charitable giving and volunteering. In AgardK. (Ed.), Nonprofit leadership handbook (pp. 781-788). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
NegyC.WoodsD. J. (1992). The importance of acculturation in understanding research with Hispanic-Americans. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 224-247.
41.
NewmanD. S. (2002). Incorporating diverse traditions into the fundraising practices of nonprofit organizations. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 37, 11-21.
42.
NorlandM. (2003). The impact of Korean immigration. In BergstenC. F.ChoiI. (Eds.), Diaspora in the world economy (pp. 61-72). Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
43.
OhY.KoeskeG. F.SalesE. (2002). Acculturation, stress, and depressive symptoms among Korean immigrants in the United States. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 511-26.
44.
OsiliU. O.DuD. (2005). Immigrant assimilation and charitable giving. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 48, 89-104
45.
PaxtonP. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 6, 254-277.
46.
PettreyJ. G. (2002). Cultivating diversity in fundraising. New York, NY: John Wiley.
47.
PhinneyJ. S. (2003). Ethnic identity and acculturation. In ChunK. M.OrganistaP. B.MarinG. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 63-81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48.
PhinneyJ. S.HorenczykG.LiebkindK.VedderP. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: An interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 493-510.
49.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
50.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
51.
RedfieldR.LintonR.HerskovitsM. (1936). Memorandum on the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149-152.
52.
SalamonL. M. (2002). The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit American. In SalamonL. M. (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 3-61). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
53.
SandersJ.NeeV.SernauS. (2002). Asian immigrants’ reliance on social ties in a multiethnic labor market. Social Forces, 81, 281-314.
54.
ShaoS. (1995, Summer). Asian American giving: issues and challenges. New Directions for Philanthropic Giving, 8, 53-64.
55.
SmithB.ShueS.VestJ. L.VillarrealJ. (1999). Philanthropy in communities of color. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
56.
SundeenR. A.GarciaC.RaskoffS. A. (2009). Ethnicity, acculturation, and volunteering to organization: A comparison of African Americans, Asians, Hispanics, and Whites. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 929-955.
57.
TerrazasA.BatogC. (2010). Korean immigrants in the United States. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from www.migrationinformation.org
UslanerE. M. (2002). The moral foundation of trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
UslanerE. M.ConleyR. S. (2003). Civic engagement and particularized trust. American Politics Research, 31, 331-360.
62.
Van SlykeD. M.AshleyS.JohnsonJ. L. (2007). Nonprofit performance, fund-raising effectiveness, and strategies for engaging African Americans in Philanthropy. American Review of Public Administration, 37, 278-305.
63.
WeisingerJ.SalipanteP. (2005). A grounded theory for building ethnically bridging social capital in voluntary organizations?Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 29-55.
64.
WongJ. S.LienP.ConwayM. M. (2005). Group-based resources and political participation among Asian Americans. American Politics Research, 33, 545-576.
65.
WilsonJ. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.
66.
WoolcockM. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151-208.
67.
ZhouM. (2004). The assimilation, the Asian way. In JacobyT. (Eds.), Reinventing the melting pot: The new immigrants and what it means to be American (pp. 139-153). New York, NY: Basic Books.
