There is limited understanding of how attitudinal variables such as generalized trust influence formal volunteering compared with demographic and socioeconomic variables. Using data from the 2005 Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), this study examines the effects of generalized trust on regular and irregular formal volunteering in Japan. As the majority of studies on formal volunteering are based in Western countries, focusing on a non-Western society extends our knowledge of volunteering decisions. Japan is known for its normative emphasis on group affiliation and in-group cooperation, and its citizens are often said to be distrustful of strangers. In such a society, how does generalized trust affect formal volunteering? A bivariate probit analysis of the JGSS data suggests that generalized trust is significantly and positively associated with the probability of irregular formal volunteering, but not with regular formal volunteering. Implications of these findings are discussed for future research linking generalized trust to formal volunteering.
BrehmJ.RahnW. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023.
CaputoR. K. (1997). Women as volunteers and activists. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 156-174.
7.
CohenD.PrusakL. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
CookK. S.YamagishiT.CheshireC.CooperR.MatsudaM.MashimaR. (2005). Trust building via risk taking: A cross-societal experiment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(2), 121-142.
9.
DrollingerT. (2010). A theoretical examination of giving and volunteering utilizing resource exchange theory. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 22(1), 55-66.
10.
FreemanR. (1997). Working for nothing: The supply of volunteer labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), S140-S166.
11.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.
12.
GallagherS. (1994). Doing their share: Comparing patterns of help given by older and younger adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 567-578.
13.
GreeneW. H. (2012). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
HaddadM. A. (2011). A state-in-society approach to the nonprofit sector: Welfare services in Japan. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(1), 26-47.
15.
HankK.StuckS. (2008). Volunteer work, informal help, and care among the 50+ in Europe: Further evidence for “linked” productive activities at older ages. Social Science Research, 37, 1280-1291.
16.
HodgkinsonV. A. (1995). Key factors influencing caring, involvement, and community. In SchervishP. G.HodgkinsonV. A.GatesM., & Associates (Eds.), Care and community in modern society: Passing on the tradition of service to future generations (pp. 21-50). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
HuangJ.van den BrinkH. M.GrootW. (2009). A meta-analysis of the effect of education on social capital. Economics of Education Review, 28, 454-464.
19.
IrwinK. (2009). Prosocial behavior across cultures: The effects of institutional versus generalized trust. In ThyeS. R.LawlerE. (Eds.), Altruism and prosocial behavior in groups (Advances in Group Processes series, Vol. 26, pp. 165-198). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
JenningsM. K.StokerL. (2004). Social trust and civic engagement across time and generations. Acta Politica, 39, 342-379.
23.
KramerR. M.BrewerM. B.HannaB. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357-389). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
KwakN.ShahD. V.HolbertR. L. (2004). Connecting, trusting, and participating: The direct and interactive effects of social associations. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 643-652.
25.
LeeY. J.MoonS. G. (2011). Mainstream and ethnic volunteering by Korean immigrants in the United States. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 811-830.
26.
MatsunagaY. (2007). To give, or not to give; to volunteer, or not to volunteer, that is the question: Evidence on Japanese philanthropic behavior revealed by the JGSS-2005 data set (Japanese General Social Surveys monographs). Nihon-ban General Social Surveys Kenkyu Ronbunshu, 6, 69-82.
27.
McPhersonJ. M.RotoloT. (1996). Testing a dynamic model of social composition: Diversity and change in voluntary groups. American Sociological Review, 61(2), 179-202.
28.
MillerA. S.MitamuraT. (2003). Are surveys on trust trustworthy?Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 62-70.
29.
NakanoL. Y. (2000). Volunteering as a lifestyle choice: Negotiating self-identities in Japan. Ethnology, 39(2), 93-107.
30.
OgawaA. (2004). Invited by the state: Institutionalizing volunteer subjectivity in contemporary Japan. Asian Anthropology, 3, 71-96.
31.
OgawaA. (2009). The failure of civil society? The third sector and the state in contemporary Japan. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
32.
ParkJ. Z.SmithC. (2000). To whom much has been given . . .: Religious capital and community voluntarism among churchgoing Protestants. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 272-286.
33.
PekkanenR.TsujinakaY. (2008). Neighbourhood associations and the demographic challenge. In CoulmasF.ConradH.Schad-SeifertA.VogtG. (Eds.), The demographic challenge: A handbook about Japan (pp. 707-720). Leiden, Netherlands: BRILL.
PharrS. J.PutnamR. D.DaltonR. J. (2000). A quarter-century of declining confidence. Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 5-25.
36.
ReedP. B.SelbeeL. K. (2000). Formal and informal volunteering and giving: Regional and community patterns in Canada (Catalogue No. 75F0048MIE—No. 5). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Statistics Canada.
37.
RossiA. S. (2001). Domains and dimensions of social responsibility: A sociodemographic profile. In RossiA. S. (Ed.), Caring and doing for others: Social responsibility in the domains of family, work, and community (pp. 97-134). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
RothsteinB. (2004). Social trust and honesty in government: A causal mechanisms approach. In KornaiJ.Rose-AckermanS.RothsteinB. (Eds.), Creating social trust: Problems of post-socialist transition (pp. 13-30). New York, NY: Palgrave.
39.
RothsteinB. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Theories of institutional design. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
RotoloT. (2000). A time to join, a time to quit: The influence of life cycle transitions on voluntary association membership. Social Forces, 78, 1133-1161.
41.
RuiterS.De GraafN. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 Countries. American Sociological Review, 71, 191-210.
42.
SchmidH. (2001). Neighborhood self-management: experiments in civil society. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
43.
ShawR.GodaK. (2004). From disaster to sustainable civil society: The Kobe experience. Disasters, 28(1), 16-40.
SmithL. M. (1975). Women as volunteers: The double subsidy. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 4(3), 119-136.
46.
SønderskovK. M. (2008). Does generalized social trust lead to associational membership? Unraveling a bowl of well-tossed spaghetti. Unpublished manuscript.
47.
StaubE. (1995). How people learn to care. In SchervishP. G.HodgkinsonV. A.GatesM., & Associates (Eds.), Care and community in modern society: Passing on the tradition of service to future generations (pp. 51-67). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
SturgisP. (2010). Assessing the validity of generalized trust questions: What kind of trust are we measuring?International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 74-92.
49.
TamuraS. (2003). The emergence of NPOs and the implications for local governance. In FurkawaandS.MenjuT. (Eds.), Japan’s road to pluralism: Transforming local communities in the global era (pp. 161-178). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Center for International Exchange.
50.
TaniguchiH. (2010). Who are volunteers in Japan?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 161-179.
51.
TaniokaI.NittaM.IwaiN.YasudaT. (2005). Japanese General Social Survey, 2005 (ICPSR 4703). Osaka, Japan: Office of Japanese General Social Survey, Osaka University of Commerce.
52.
UchidaYNorasakkunkitV.KitayamaS. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 223-239.
53.
UslanerE. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54.
UslanerE. M. (2008). The foundations of trust: macro and micro. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 289-294.
55.
UslanerE. M.BadescuG. (2004). Honesty, trust, and legal norms in the transition to democracy: Why Bo Rothstein is better able to explain Sweden than Romania. In KornaiJ.Rose-AckermanS.RothsteinB. (Eds.), Creating social trust: Problems of post-socialist transition (pp. 31-52). New York, NY: Palgrave.
56.
WangL.GraddyE. (2008). Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(1), 23-42.
57.
WilsonJ. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.
58.
WilsonJ.MusickM. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.
59.
WilsonJ.MusickM. (2000). The effects of volunteering on the volunteer. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 141-168.
60.
YamagishiT.YamagishiM. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129-166.
61.
YeungA. B. (2008). Free to choose—So why choose volunteering? Exploring independence and social action in the Finnish Church. Voluntary Action: The Journal of the Institute for Volunteering Research, 9(1), 36-45.
