This study explores the antecedents to trust among the participants in a cross-sectoral interorganizational network. We offer hypotheses for nine potential antecedents of trust divided into three categories: attributes of the trustor, of the trustee, and of their relationship. We analyzed dyadic data collected from a network of community-based organizations collaborating to promote change in a south Los Angeles community. The results of our analysis reveal that trust building is not a simple process but results from a combination of attributes of trustors, trustees, and their relationships. Trustors’ general tendency to trust other participants in the network, trustees’ reputation in the network, whether a trustee is from the same sector as the trustor, whether a trustee is important to the trustor, and the multiplexity of interactions between a trustor and trustee significantly influenced the level of trust. Some suggestions for developing trust among participants in such networks are offered.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 295-326.
2.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2003). Collaborative public management: new strategies for local government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
AstleyW. G.FombrunC. J. (1983). Collective strategy: Social ecology of organizational environment. Academy of Management Review, 8, 576-587.
4.
AxelrodR. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
BakerW. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 589-625.
6.
BardachE. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
8.
BehnR. D. (1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review, 55, 313-324.
9.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BradachJ. L.EcclesR. G. (1989). Price, authority and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97-118.
11.
BrehmJ.RahnW. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023.
12.
BriggsX. (1998). Doing democracy up close: Culture, power, and communication in community planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18, 1-13.
13.
BrykA.RaudenbushS. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
14.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55.
15.
BurtR. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79-141.
16.
ButlerJ. K.CantrellR. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19-28.
17.
ChaskinR. J. (2005). Democracy and bureaucracy in a community planning process. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 408-419.
18.
ChaskinR. J.JosephM. L.Chipenda-DansokhoS. (1997). Implementing comprehensive community development: Possibilities and limitations. Social Work, 42, 435-444.
19.
ChenB. (2008). Assessing interorganizational networks for public service delivery: A process-perceived effectiveness framework. Public Performance & Management Review, 31, 348-363.
20.
ChuaR. Y.IngramP.MorrisM. W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 436-452.
21.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
22.
CookJ.WallT. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
23.
DaleA.NewmanL. (2010). Social capital: A necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development?Community Development Journal, 45, 5-21.
24.
DeutschM. (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relation, 13, 123-140.
25.
DodgsonM. (1993). Learning, trust, and technological collaboration. Human Relations, 46, 77-95.
26.
EvansA. M.RevelleW. (2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585-1593.
27.
FrostT.StimpsonD. V.MaughanM. R. C. (1978). Some correlates of trust. Journal of Psychology, 99, 103-108.
28.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.
29.
GittellR.VidalA. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
GlaeserE. L.LaibsonD. I.ScheinkmanJ. A.SoutterC. L. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811-846.
31.
HamelG. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.
32.
HansenT. J. (2010). The effects of facilitation management on interorganizational coordination and trust in an anti-Iraq war political advocacy nonprofit network in the Twin Cities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
33.
HardinR. (1992). The street level epistemology of trust. Analyse and Kritik, 14, 152-176.
34.
HeideJ. B.MinerA. S. (1992). The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer–seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 265-291.
35.
HosmerL. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 379-403.
36.
HuxhamC. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5, 401-423.
37.
IsettK. R.ProvanK. G. (2005). The evolution of dyadic interorganizational relationships in a network of publicly funded nonprofit agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 149-165.
38.
JacksonM. R.MarrisP. (1996). Collaborative comprehensive community initiatives: Overview of an emerging community improvement orientation. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
39.
Johnson-GeorgeC.SwapW. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306-1317.
40.
KeeH. W.KnoxR. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14, 357-366.
41.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception. New York, NY: Guilford.
42.
KernaghanK. (2009). Moving towards integrated public governance: Improving service delivery through community engagement. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 239-254.
43.
KollockP. (1994). The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 313-345.
44.
KramerR. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
45.
KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
LahnoB. (1995). Trust, reputation, and exit in exchange relationships. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 495-510.
47.
LambrightK. T.MischenP. A.LarameeC. B. (2010). Building trust in public and nonprofit networks: Personal, dyadic, and third-party influences. American Review of Public Administration, 40, 64-82.
48.
LaneC.BachmannR. (1996). The social constitution of supplier relations in Britain and Germany. Organization Studies, 17, 365-395.
49.
LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (2001). Social capital: Theory and research. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
50.
LundinM. (2007). Explaining cooperation: How resource interdependence, goal congruence, and trust affect joint actions in policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 651-672.
51.
MandellM. (2001). Getting results through collaboration: Networking and network structures for public policy and management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
52.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
53.
McGuireM. (2002). Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review, 62, 599-609.
54.
McGuireM. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33-43.
55.
McKnightD. H.CummingsL. L.ChervanyN. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473-490.
56.
MitchellS. M.ShortellS. M. (2000). The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: A typology for research, policy, and practice. Milbank Quarterly, 78, 241-289.
57.
MorganD.BaconK. G.BunchR.CameronC. D.DeisR. (1996). What middle managers do in local government: Stewardship of the public trust and the limits of reinventing government. Public Administration Review, 56, 359-365.
58.
MuthusamyS. K.WhiteM. A. (2005). Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization Studies, 26, 415-441.
59.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
60.
O’BrienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41, 673-690.
61.
OnyxJ.BullenP. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 23-42.
62.
OspinaS.YaroniA. (2003). Understanding cooperative behavior in labor management cooperation: A theory-building exercise. Public Administration Review, 63, 455-471.
63.
O’TooleL. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 45-52.
64.
PotapchukW. R.CrockerJ. P.SchechterW. H.Jr.(1997). Building community with social capital: Chits and chums or chats with change. National Civic Review, 86, 129-139.
65.
PowellW. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
66.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 1-24.
67.
ProvanK. G.MilwardH. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 414-423.
68.
PutnamR. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35-42.
69.
RingP. S.Van de VenA. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90-118.
70.
RobertsonP. J. (1998). Interorganizational relationships: Key issues for integrated services. In McCroskeyJ.EinbinderS. D. (Eds.), Communities and universities: Remaking professional and interprofessional education for the next century (pp. 67-87). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
71.
RotterJ. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
72.
RousseauD. M. (2004). Psychological contracts in the workplace: Understanding the ties that motivate. Academy of Management Executive, 10, 120-127.
73.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. B.BurtR. S.CamererC. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
74.
RoussosS. T.FawcettS. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369-402.
75.
SakoM. (1992). Prices, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Schindler-RainmanE. (1981). Toward collaboration—Risks we need to take. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 10, 120-127.
77.
ShahD. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual-level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19, 469-496.
78.
SimoG.BiesA. L. (2006). The role of nonprofits in disaster response: An expanded model of cross-sector collaboration. Public Administration Review, 67, 125-142.
79.
SitkinS. B.RothN. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4, 367-392.
80.
SnavelyK.TracyM. B. (2002). Development of trust in rural nonprofit collaborations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 62-83.
81.
SoestersJ.van ItersonA. (2002). Blame and praise gossip in organizations: Established, outsiders and the civilizing process. In van ItersonA.MastenbroekW.NewtonT.SmithD. (Eds.), The civilized organization: Norbert Elias and the future of organization studies (pp. 25-40). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins B. V.
82.
SorrentinoR. M.HolmesJ. G.HannaS. E.SharpA. (1995). Uncertainty orientation and trust in close relationships: Individual differences in cognitive styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 314-327.
83.
SowaJ. E. (2009). The collaboration decision in nonprofit organizations: Views from the front line. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 1003-1025.
84.
StolleD. (1998). Bowling together, bowling alone: The development of generalized trust in voluntary associations. Political Psychology, 19, 497-525.
85.
SydowJ. (1998). Understanding the constitution of interorganizational trust. In LaneC.BachmannR. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations (pp. 31-63). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
86.
UzziB. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674-698.
87.
VangenS.HuxhamC. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 5-31.
88.
VeenstraG. (2002). Explicating social capital: Trust and participation in the civil space. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27, 547-572.
89.
WellmanB.FrankK. (2001). Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support from personal communities. In LinN.BurtR.CookK. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 233-274). Chicago, IL: Aldine De Gruyter.
90.
WillemA. (2010). Trust in whole networks in the public and nonprofit sector: The impact of public sector characteristics. Unpublished working paper, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
91.
WilliamsM. (2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26, 377-396.
92.
ZaheerA.McEvilyB.PerroneV. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9, 141-159.
93.
ZaheerA.VenkatramanN. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 373-392.
94.
ZajacE. J.D’AunnoT. A. (1993). Managing strategic alliances. In ShortellS. M.KaluznyA. D. (Eds.), Health care management: Organization design and behavior (pp. 274-293). Albany, NY: Delmar.
95.
ZuckerL. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1849-1920. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 553-111). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
