This research compares cooperative child day care centers to for-profit and independent nonprofit centers in terms of parental involvement in operations (such as fundraising and classroom participation), parental involvement in governance (specifically, serving on the board and attending the annual meeting), and quality of care. It also tests whether parent control of the board is associated with quality. Findings show that cooperative centers feature greater parental involvement in operational aspects, including fundraising and care of the center or grounds compared to for-profits and independent nonprofits. Cooperatives are also more likely to have parents on their boards and feature boards with parent majorities compared to independent nonprofits, although more than half of these nonprofit centers also have parent-controlled boards. Results also show that while the cooperative form, tested as a distinct organizational type, is not a predictor of quality, parent control of the board is a positive predictor of this outcome.
AbzugR.WebbN. J. (1999). Relationships between nonprofit and for-profit organizations: A stakeholder perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 416-431.
2.
Ben-NerA.Van HoomissenT. (1991). Nonprofit organizations in the mixed economy: A demand and supply analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62, 519-550.
3.
Ben-NerA.Van HoomissenT. (1994). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Law and public policy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 4, 393-414.
4.
BozemanB.BretschneiderS. (1994). The “publicness puzzle” in organization theory: A test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 197-223.
5.
BrudneyJ. (1989). Using coproduction to deliver services. In PerryJ. L. (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 513-526). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
CoontzE. K.EsperE. (2003). Cooperative child care for rural residents: The experience from California. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 31, 111-125.
CornforthC. (2004). The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71, 11-32.
9.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Pitman.
10.
FriedmanA. L.MilesS. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
GeeL. E. (2010). The nature of giving time to your child’s school. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/089976401036211610.1177/0899764010362116.
12.
GoelmanH.DohertyG.LeroD.LaGrangeA.TougasJ. (2000). You bet I care! Caring and learning environments: Quality in child care centres across Canada. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being, University of Guelph.
13.
GoelmanH.ForerB.KershawP.DohertyG.LeroD.LaGrangeA. (2006). Towards a predictive model of quality in Canadian child care centers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 280-295.
14.
HandyF.SetoS.WakarukA.MerseyB.MejiaA.CopelandL. (2010). The discerning consumer: Is nonprofit status a factor?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39866-883.
15.
HarmsT.CliffordR.CryerD. (2005). Early childhood environment rating scale: Revised edition. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
HelburnS. (1995). Cost, quality and child outcomes in child care centers, technical report. Denver: University of Colorado.
17.
LavilleJ.-L.LévesqueB.MendellM. (2007). The social economy: Diverse approaches and practices in Europe and Canada. In NoyaA.ClarenceE. (Eds.), The social economy. Building inclusive economies (pp. 155-182). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
18.
LavilleJ.-L.NyssensM. (2000). Solidarity-based third sector organizations in the “proximity services” field: A European Francophone perspective. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11, 67-84.
19.
Leviten-ReidC.HoytA. (2009). Community-based home support agencies: Comparing the quality of care of cooperative and non-profit organizations. Canadian Journal on Aging, 28, 107-120.
20.
LyonM. E.CanningP. M. (1997). Auspice, location, provincial legislation and funding of day care in Atlantic Canada: Relationships with centre quality and implications for policy. The Canadian Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 6, 139-155.
21.
MillD.BartlettN.WhiteD. R. (1995). Profit and nonprofit day care: A comparison of quality, caregiver behaviour, and structural features. Canadian Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 4, 45-53.
22.
MocanH. N. (1997). Cost functions, efficiency, and quality in day care centers. The Journal of Human Resources, 32, 861-891.
23.
MorrisJ. R.HelburnS.W. (2000). Child care center quality differences: The role of profit status, client preferences, and trust. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 377-399.
24.
MünknerH. (2004). Multi-stakeholder co-operatives and their legal framework. In BorzagaC.SpearR. (Eds.), Trends and challenges for co-operatives and social enterprises in developed and transition countries (pp. 49-81). Trento, Italy: Edizioni31.
25.
PestoffV. A. (1998). Beyond the market and state: Social enterprises and civil democracy in a welfare society. Brookfield, VA: Ashgate.
26.
PestoffV. A. (2000). Enriching Swedish women’s work environment: The case of social enterprises in day care. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 21, 39-70.
27.
PestoffV. A. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8, 503-519.
28.
PhillipsD. A.HowesC.WhitebrookM. (1992). The social policy context of child care: Effects on quality. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 25-51.
29.
PhillipsenL. C.BurchinalM.HowesC.CryerD. (1997). The prediction of process quality from structural features of child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 281-303.
30.
QuarterJ. (1992). Canada’s social economy: Co-operatives, non-profits, and other community enterprises. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: James Lorimer.
31.
QuarterJ.SousaJ.RichmondB. J.CarmichaelI. (2001). Comparing member-based organizations within a social economy framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 351-375.
32.
RigbyE.RyanR. M.Brooks-GunnJ. (2007). Child care quality in different state policy contexts. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 887-907.
33.
RotoloT.WilsonJ. (2007). The effects of children and employment status on the volunteer work of American women. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 487-503.
34.
SosinskyL. S.LordH.ZiglerE. (2007). For-profit/nonprofit differences in center-based child care quality: Results from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of early child care and youth development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 390-410.
35.
SpearR. (2000). The co-operative advantage. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71, 507-523.
36.
SteinbergR. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In PowellW. W.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 117-139). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
StryjanY.WijkströmF. (1996). Cooperatives and nonprofit organizations in Swedish social Welfare. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 67, 5-27.
38.
TomasA. (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15, 243-263.
39.
WhitebrookM.HowesC.PhillipsD. (1989) Who cares? Child care teachers and the quality of care in America. Oakland, CA: Child Care Employee Project.
