How do microfinance institutions (MFIs) allocate their surplus to stakeholders? This article shows that this allocation process varies depending on the MFI ownership structure. Nonprofit organizations and shareholders-held MFIs exhibit a tendency to largely keep their surplus within the MFI as a self-financing margin (reserve accounts, future investments, and capital increase) rather than transferring it to their clients (interest rate decrease) and their employees (salary increase). The surplus distribution in COOPs is more in favor of providers and employees. Finally, the article discusses the importance of these findings for the evaluation of MFIs by policy makers.
ArmendarizA.SzafarzA. (2011) On mission drift in microfinance institutions. In ArmendarizB.LabieM. (Ed.), The Handbook of Microfinance (pp. 341-366). London, UK: Scientific Work.
2.
AshtaA.HudonM. (2009). To whom should we be fair? Ethical issues in Balancing Stakeholder Interests from Banco Compartamos Case Study (Working Paper). Brussels, Belgium: CEB Brussels.
3.
BranchB.BakerC. (2000) Overcoming credit union governance problems. In WestleyG.BranchB. (Ed.) Safe money: Building effective credit union in Latin America (pp. 203-226). Washington, DC: Inter American Development Bank.
4.
BurlaudA.DahanL. (1987) Productivity assessment in public sector: Global productivity surplus accounts. Financial Accountability and Management, 3, 235-247.
5.
CaudillS.GropperD.HartarskaV. (2009). Which microfinance institutions are becoming more cost-effective with time? Evidence from a mixture model. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 41, 651-672.
6.
Centre d’Etude des Revenus et des Coûts. (1969). Surplus de productivité globale et comptes de surplus [Surplus overall productivity and surplus accounts] (Working Paper No. 1). Paris, France: Author.
7.
CSFI (2008). Microfinance Banana Skins - Risks in a Booming Industry. Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation, London.
8.
CourbisR.TempléP. (1975). La méthode des comptes de surplus et ses applications macroéconomiques. Paris, France: collection de l’INSEE.
9.
CuevasC.FischerK. (2006). Cooperative financial institutions—Issues in governance, regulation, and supervision (World Bank Working Paper No. 82). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
10.
CullR.Demirguc-KuntA.MorduchJ. (2009). Microfinance meets the market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 167-192.
11.
DesrochersM.FischerK.GueyieJ. P. (2003). Theory and test on the corporate governance of financial cooperative systems (CIRPÉE Working Paper No. 03-34). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: CIRPÉE.
12.
FamaE.JensenM. (1983) Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
13.
FournierY.OuedraogoA. (1996). Les coopératives d’épargne et crédit en Afrique: histoire et évolutions récentes [The credit unions in Africa: History and recent developments]. Revue Tiers Monde, 37(145), 67-83.
14.
FreemanR.ReedD. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25, 88-106.
15.
GalemaR.LensinkR.SpierdijkL. (2008) International diversification and microfinance. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1286769
16.
Gutiérrez-NietoB.Serrano-CincaC. (2007). Factors explaining the rating of microfinance institutions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 439-464.
17.
Gutiérrez-NietoB.Serrano-CincaC. (2010). Factors influencing funder loyalty to microfinance institutions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 302-320.
18.
Gutiérrez-NietoB.Serrano-CincaC.Mar MolineroC. (2007) Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega, 35, 131-142.
19.
HansmannH. (1996). The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
20.
HartarskaV. (2005) Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the newly independent states. World Development, 33, 1627-1643.
21.
HartarskaV.MerslandR. (2012) Which governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? Evidence from rated microfinance institutions. European Financial Management, 18, 218-239.
22.
HermesN.LensinkR.MeestersA. (2011) Outreach and efficiency of microfinance institutions. World Development, 39, 938-948.
23.
HonohanP. (2004). Financial sector policy and the poor: Selected findings and issues (World Bank Working Paper No. 43). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
24.
HudonM.TraçaD. (2011). On the Efficiency Effects of Subsidies in Microfinance: An Empirical Inquiry. World Development, 39, 966-973.
25.
JamesN.HartarskaV.MerslandR. (2009). Scale economies and input price elasticities in rated MFIs (Working Paper). Auburn, AL: Auburn University.
26.
JanssonT.RosalesR.WestleyL. (2004). Principles and practices for regulating and supervising microfinance. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
27.
LabieM. (2001). Corporate governance in micro-finance organizations: A long and winding road. Management Decision, 39, 296-301.
28.
LabieM. (2003) Corporate governance in the non-profit sector: A framework for microfinance organizations. Paper presented at 19th EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.
29.
LedgerwoodJ.WhiteV. (2006). Transforming microfinance institutions: Providing full financial services to the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.
30.
MbangalaM. (2001). L’évaluation de la performance économique des entreprises publiques Africaines par la méthode des comptes des surplus [Assessing the economic performance of African public enterprises by the method of surplus accounts]. Annals of Public and Cooperatives Economics, 72, 183-207.
31.
MerslandR. (2009). The cost of ownership in microfinance organizations. World Development, 37, 469-478.
32.
MerslandR.StrømO. (2008) Performance and trade-offs in microfinance organizations—does ownership matter?Journal of International Development, 20, 598-612.
33.
MerslandR.StrømO. (2009). Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33, 662-669.
PérilleuxA. (2008). Les coopératives d’épargne et de crédit en microfinance face aux problématiques de gouvernance et de croissance [Unions and microfinance credit deal with issues of governance and growth] (Working Papers CEB 08-025). Mons, Belgium: Université de Mons.
36.
RockR.OteroM.SaltzmanS. (1998). Principles and practices of microfinance governance. ACCION International, Microentreprise Best Practices, Development Alternatives, Bethesda, USA.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
