The Better Business Bureau (BBB) states that it is a neutral party striving to serve equally the interests of both businesses and consumers. However, critics have alleged that the BBB’s policies and practices are biased in favor of businesses. This study analyzes the composition of the boards of directors of local BBB offices. Using resource-dependency theory, arguments are advanced to explain why the BBB may be more inclined to have board members from business backgrounds rather than board members who are “community influentials” (e.g., executives with nonprofit organizations and charities, academicians, and government employees). Results show that the vast majority of BBB board members are businesspeople from industries that generate large numbers of BBB consumer complaints. Discussion focuses on the implications of these findings for the credibility and legitimacy of the BBB as a representative of consumer interests in the marketplace.
Abzug, R. (1999). Nonprofits in organizational sociology’s research traditions: An empirical study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 330-338.
2.
Abzug, R., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2001). Nonprofit boards: Crucibles of expertise or symbols of local identities? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 51-73.
3.
Adkins, S. (2004, May 4). BBB services nationwide surged in 2003; businesses ranked by inquiries and complaints [News release]. Arlington, VA: Better Business Bureau.
4.
Better Business Bureau. (n.d.-a). Online complaint system. Retrieved August 31, 2005, from http://complaint.bbb.org/
5.
Better Business Bureau. (n.d.-b). Dispute resolution activity report for 2004. Retrieved August 31, 2005, from http://www.dr.bbb.org/DRresults/index.asp
6.
Corbin, J. (1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 296-314.
7.
Council of Better Business Bureaus. (2005). U.S. Better Business Bureaus complaint rank. Retrieved February 22, 2006, from http://www.bbb.org/about/stat2005/us05compsort.pdf
8.
Council of Better Business Bureaus. (n.d.-a). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved February 24, 2005, from http://www.bbb.org/about/faq.asp.
9.
Council of Better Business Bureaus. (n.d.-b). Locate a bureau. Retrieved January 25, 2005, from http://lookup.bbb.org.
10.
Duarte, J. (2004, January 22). Can you trust the BBB? [Message]. Retrieved from http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=8856.
11.
Emerson, R. H. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
12.
Froelich, K. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246-268.
13.
Garrett, D. E. (2004). The frequency and distribution of Better Business Bureau complaints: An analysis based on exchange transactions. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 17, 88-102.
14.
Garrett, D. E. (2006). Information contained in company reliability reports from the Better Business Bureau. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 40(1), 1-20.
15.
Heimovics, R. D., Herman, R. D., & Jurkiewicz Coughlin, C. L. (1993). Executive leadership and resource dependence in nonprofit organizations: A frame analysis. Public Administration Review, 53(5), 419-427.
16.
Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694-704.
17.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, Jr., A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235-255.
18.
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396.
19.
Holland, T. P. (2002). Board accountability: Lessons from the field. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 12(4), 409-428.
20.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
MacDonald, C., McDonald, M., & Norman, W. (2002). Charitable conflicts of interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1/2), 67-74.
22.
Marable, L. M. (1995, October). Better Business Bureaus are a bust. Money, 24, 106-110.
23.
McCambridge, R. (2004). Underestimating the power of nonprofit governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 346-354.
24.
Memphis, Tennessee, Better Business Bureau. (n.d.). Membership information. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.midsouth.bbb.org/memberinfo.html.
25.
Miller-Millesen, J. L. (2003). Understanding the behavior of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 521-547.
26.
Munns, J. M. (1978). Consumer complaints as pre-purchase information: An evaluation of Better Business Bureau reports to consumers. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 12(1), 76-87.
27.
Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). Breakthrough board performance: How to harness your board’s intellectual capital. Corporate Governance, 4(1), 5-23.
28.
O’Regan, K., & Oster, S. M. (2005). Does the structure and composition of the board matter? The case of nonprofit organizations. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organizations, 21(1), 205-227.
29.
Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(3), 349-364.
30.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
31.
Phoenix, Arizona, Better Business Bureau. (n.d.). Membership brochure: Business credibility. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.phoenix.bbb.org/memberbenefits.html.
32.
Presley, C. (2000, July 3). Houston Better Business Bureau BBB deceptive advertising [Message]. Retrieved from http://badbusinessbureau.com/view.asp?id=2586&view.
33.
Provan, K. G. (1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 221-236.
34.
Rip-OffReport.com. (2000, February 22). Better Business Bureau or buyer better beware? Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://www.ripoffreport.com/view.asp?id=1343&view
35.
Rosenthal, B. S. (1971). Report on the Better Business Bureaus. In U.S. Congressional Record, 117, part 36 (December 13, 1971 to December 17, 1971), 47781-47795.
36.
Saidel, J. R. (1991). Resource interdependence: The relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 51(6), 543-553.
37.
Schmid, H., Dodd, P., & Tropman, J. E. (1987). Board decision making in human service organizations. Human Systems Management, 7, 155-161.
38.
St. Louis, Missouri, Better Business Bureau. (n.d.). Why membership is important. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.stlouis.bbb.org/memberinfo.html
