In this grounded theory research project, face-to-face interviews were conducted with program participants, board members, administrators, coordinators, and collaborators in 15 faith-based programs. Findings concerning the roles played by participants, volunteers, and paid staff reveal the wearing of multiple hats, facilitated by a tendency toward cross-training, role diffusion, and doing what is needed. Boundaries created by roles appear to be less important than pragmatically responding to meet human needs. The moral imperative or faith-based nature of the work appears to be a recruiting tool for both paid staff and volunteers, as well as an expressed personal benefit for both. Challenges include turnover among paid staff and volunteers, heavy reliance on volunteers, and low pay. Psychological contracting with a faith-based community may be related to the ability to cope with fluid role expectations and associated ambiguities.
Allahyari, R. A. (2000). Visions of charity: Volunteer workers and moral community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Ammerman, N. T. (1997). Congregation and community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
Bagihole, B. (1996). Tea and sympathy or teetering on social work? An investigation of the blurring of boundaries between voluntary and professional care. Social Policy & Administration, 30(3), 189-205.
4.
Brody, R. (2000). Effectively managing human service organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Brudney, J. L. (1990). Fostering volunteer programs in the public sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Brudney, J. L., & Gazley, B. (2002). Testing the conventional wisdom regarding volunteer programs: A longitudinal analysis of the service corps of retired executives and the U.S. small business administration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(4), 525-548.
7.
Callero, P. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 203-214.
8.
Castelloe, P., Watson, T., & White, C. (2002). Participatory change: An integrative approach to community practice. Journal of Community Practice, 10(4), 7-31.
9.
Chambre, S. M. (1991a). The volunteer response to the AIDS epidemic: Implications for research on voluntarism. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(3), 267-288.
10.
Chambre, S. M. (1991b). Volunteers as witnesses: Perspectives on AIDS volunteers in New York City, 1981-1988. Social Service Review, 65, 531-547.
11.
Chambre, S. M. (2001). The changing nature of “faith” in faith-based organizations: Secularization and ecumenicism in four AIDS organizations in New York City. Social Service Review, 75, 435-455.
12.
Clary, E. G., Synder, M., & Stukas, A. A. (1996). Volunteers’ motivations: Findings from a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(4), 485-505.
13.
Cnaan, R. A. (with Boddie, S. C., Handy, F., Yancey, G., & Schneider, R.). (2002). The invisible caring hand: American congregations and the provision of welfare. New York: New York University Press.
14.
Cnaan, R. A., Kasternakis, M., & Wineburg, R. J. (1993). Religious people, religious congregations, and volunteerism in human services: Is there a link?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(3), 33-51.
15.
Cooney, K., & Weaver, D. (2001). The implementation of a ‘Work First’ welfare-to-work program in a changing environment. Journal of Community Practice, 9(3), 33-54.
16.
Ellis, S. J., & Noyes, K. H. (1990). By the people: A history of Americans as volunteers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, D. B. (1999). Volunteer participation and withdrawal: A psychological contract perspective on the role of expectations and organizational support. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9, 349-367.
18.
Garland, D. S. R. (Ed.). (1992). Church social work: Helping the whole person in the context of the church. St. Davids, PA: North American Association of Christian Social Workers.
19.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
20.
Govekar, P. L., & Govekar, M. A. (2002). Using economic theory and research to better understand volunteer behavior. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 13(1), 33-45.
21.
Grube, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1108-1119.
22.
Harris, M. (1996). “An inner group of willing people”: Volunteering in a religious context. Social Policy & Administration, 30(1), 54-68.
23.
Harris, M. (1998). Organizing God’s work: Challenges for churches and synagogues. New York: St. Martin’s.
24.
Hutchison, E. D. (2004). Dimensions of human behavior: The changing life course. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
25.
Independent Sector Survey on Giving and Volunteering. (2001). Giving and volunteering in the United States 2001. Retrieved December 5 2002, from http://www.independentsector.org/programs/research/gv01main.html
26.
Jeavons, T. H. (2000). Understanding congregations as voluntary organizations: New insights for the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10(4), 457-462.
27.
Kettner, P. M. (2002). Achieving excellence in the management of human service organizations. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M., & Martin, L. L. (1999). Designing and managing programs: An effectiveness-based approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Lewis, J. A., Lewis, M. D., Packard, T., & Souflee, F., Jr. (2001). Management of human service programs (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30.
Liao-Troth, M. A. (2001). Attitude differences between paid workers and volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(4), 423-442.
31.
Lohmann, R. A., & Lohmann, N. (2002). Social administration. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
McCurley, S., & Lynch, R. (1996). Volunteer management. Downers Grove, IL: Heritage Art.
33.
Netting, F. E. (2002). Reflections on the meaning of sectarian, religious-affiliated, and faith-based language: Implications for human service consumers. Social Work & Christianity, 29(1), 13-30.
34.
Netting, F. E., Borders, K., Nelson, H. W., & Huber, R. (2004). Volunteer and paid staff relationships: Implications for social work administration. Administration in Social Work, 28(3/4), 69-89.
35.
O’Connor, M. K. (2002). Using qualitative research in practice evaluation. Social workers’ desk reference. In A. R. Roberts & G. J. Greene (Eds.), Social work desk reference (pp. 777-780). New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Patti, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). The handbook of social welfare management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Pearce, J.L. (1993). Volunteers: The organizational behavior of unpaid workers. New York: Routledge.
38.
Perlmutter, F. D., & Cnaan, R. A. (1993). Challenging human service organizations to redefine volunteer roles. Administration in Social Work, 17(4), 77-95.
39.
Prince, J., & Austin, M. J. (2001). Innovative programs and practices emerging from the implementation of welfare reform: A cross-case analysis. Journal of Community Practice, 9(3), 1-14.
40.
Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139.
41.
Sider, R. J., & Unruh, H. R. (2004). Typology of religious characteristics or social services and educational organizations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 109-134.
42.
Smith, D. B. (2004). Volunteering in retirement: Perceptions of midlife workers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 55-73.
43.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Telfair, J., & Mulvihill, B. A. (2000). Bridging science and practice: The integrated model of community-based evaluation (IMCBE). Journal of Community Practice, 7(3), 37-65.
45.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.
