This article explores how information technology affects the forms and possibilities of voluntary efforts. Specifically, the authors examine the emergence of grassroots organizations in cyberspace. An analysis of two cyber-grassroots organizations (CGOs), Afghanistan Online and Rebuild-Afghanistan, highlights CGOs’ similarities, differences,and relative strengths and weaknesses compared to their traditional physical-space counterparts. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications for our understanding of grassroots organizations generally. Traditional characteristics such as size, scope, and the nature of communication need to be refined to better account for new forms of grassroots organizations.
Baron, S., Field, J., & Schuller, T. (Eds.). (2000). Social capital: Critical perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
Bourdieu, P. (1986).Forms of social capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-260). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
3.
Brainard, L. A. (2003). Citizen organizing in cyberspace: Illustrations from health care and implications for public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 384-406.
4.
Brainard, L. A.,& Siplon, P. D. (2002).Cyberspace challenges to mainstream nonprofit health organizations. Administration & Society, 34(2), 141-175.
5.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Global public policy, partnership, and the case of the World Commission on Dams. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 317-329.
6.
Bush, R. (1992). Survival of the nonprofit spirit in a for-profit world. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 12(4), 391-410.
7.
Carroll, T. F. (1992). Intermediary NGOs: The supporting link in grassroots development. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
8.
Civille, R. (1997). Environmental organizing on the Internet. Center for Civic Networking, whitepaper for desktop assistance. Retrieved July 16, 2003, from http://www.techrocks.org/enviroorganizing.html
9.
Coston, J. M. (1999). Grassroots organizations and influencing public policy processes: Lessons from around the world. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 2(1/2), 1-26.
10.
Couto, R. A. (1998). Community coalitions and grassroots policies of empowerment. Administration & Society, 30(5), 569-594.
11.
Edwards, B., & Foley, M. (1998). Social capital and civil society beyond Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(2).
12.
Fischer, C. (2001, August). Bowling alone: What’s the score? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Anaheim, CA.
13.
Fisher, J. (1992). Local governments and the independent sector in the third world. In K. D. McCarthy, V. A. Hodgkinson, R. D. Sumariwalla, & associates (Eds.), The nonprofit sector in the global community (pp. 70-89). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Fisher, J. (1993). The road from Rio: Sustainable development and the nongovernmental movement in the third world. Westport, CT: Praeger.
15.
Gilbert, M. (1999). The interactivity of environmental web sites. Retrieved February 2002 from http://research.gilbert.org/siteanalyzer/archive/sa2
16.
Gilbert, M. (2002). Disconnected: The first nonprofit email survey. Retrieved April 2002 from http://research.gilbert.org/nes/disconnected
17.
Hirschman, A. O. (1984). Getting ahead collectively: Grassroots experiences in Latin America. New York: Pergamon.
18.
Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (1997). Too close to the powerful, too far from the powerless? In D. Hulme, & M. Edwards (Eds.), NGOs, states and donors: Too close for comfort? (pp. 275-284). New York: St. Martin’s.
19.
Jamieson, D. (2000). Relationship building in the networked age: Some implications of the Internet for non-profit organizations. Philanthropist, 15(2). Retrieved February 2002 from http://www.charityvillage.com/charityvillage/research/rofr19.html
20.
Johnson, M. (1998).Non-profit organizations and the Internet. First Monday, 4(2). Retrieved March 2002 from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_2/mjohnson
21.
Johnson, M. (2001). Results of the 3rd Internet survey of Australian non profit organizations. Retrieved May 2002 from www.wesleymission.org.au/publications/fr/survey.html
22.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
Korten, D. C. (1990). Getting to the 21st century: Voluntary action and the global agenda. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
24.
Lipsky, M., & Rathgreb Smith, S. (1989/1990).Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104(4), 625-648.
25.
Loury, G. (1977).Adynamic theory of racial income differences. In P. Wallace & A. Le Mund (Eds.), Women, minorities and employment discrimination (pp. 153-186). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
26.
Loury, G. (1987). Why should we care about group inequality?Social Philosophy and Policy, 5, 249-271.
27.
McNutt, J., & Boland, K. M. (1999). Electronic advocacy by nonprofit organizations in social welfare policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 432-451.
28.
Murphy, D. F., & Bendell, J. (1997). In the company of partners: Business, environmental groups and sustainable development Post-Rio. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
29.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowlingalone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
Ross, J. C. (1976). An assembly of good fellows: Voluntary associations in history. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
33.
Skocpol, T. (1996). Unsolved mysteries: The Tocqueville files: Unraveling from above. American Prospect, 7(25). Retrieved January 10, 2003, from www.prospect.org
34.
Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
35.
Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. (1999). Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
36.
Smith, D. H. (1997). The international history of grassroots associations. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 38(3/4), 189-216.
37.
Smith, D. H. (1999). The effective grassroots association, part one: Organizational factors that produce internal impact. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(4), 443-456.
38.
Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Spencer, T. (2002). The potential of the Internet for non-profit organizations. First Monday, 7(2). Retrieved July 16, 2003, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_8/spencer
40.
Stewart, S. (1999). Not for profit. Retrieved January 2002 from www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,7809,00.html
41.
Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America (J. P. Mayer, Ed.; G. C. Lawrence, Trans.). New York: HarperCollins.
42.
Wagner, M. (1999). Nonprofits face hurdles. Internet Week, 732, 79-79.
43.
Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (1991). New York: Random House.
44.
Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw Hill.
45.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Wills G. (2000). Putnam’s America. American Prospect, 11(16). Retrieved January 2003 from www.prospect.org
47.
Wilson, J. Q. (1995). Political organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
