Objectives: While online health information (OHI) has become ubiquitous, little is known about its use by middle-aged and older adults. This contribution examines the role of OHI and its influence on the patient–physician relationship. Method: This qualitative study reports the thematic analysis of 40 semistructured, in-depth interviews with Flemish middle-aged and older adults between the ages of 50 and 80 years. Results: Middle-aged and older adults obtain OHI pre- and post-consultation, albeit with different motivations and in search of different types of information. Patients strategically and carefully introduce OHI in the clinical encounter. “Doctor Google” expands the traditional patient–physician dyad into an information triangle. Discussion: The findings have implications for policy guidance and clinical practice. Public campaigns against “Googling” for health information might have to be amended to be successful. Importantly, physicians are increasingly expected to refer to and appraise OHI and put it into the individual patient context.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
BroomA. (2005). Virtually he@lthy: The impact of Internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 325-345.
3.
ChiuY. (2011). Probing, impelling, but not offending doctors: The role of the Internet as an information source for patients’ interactions with doctors. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1658-1666.
ChungJ. E. (2013). Patient–provider discussion of online health information. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 627-648.
6.
CzajaS. J.SharitJ.HernandezM. A.NairS. N.LoewensteinD. (2010). Variability among older adults in Internet health information-seeking performance. Gerontechnology, 9, 46-55.
7.
DugganA. P.ThompsonT. L. (2011). Provider–patient interaction and related outcomes. In ThompsonT. L.ParrottR.NussbaumJ. F. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (2nd ed., pp. 414-427). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
EliassenA. H. (2016). Power relations and health care communication in older adulthood: Educating recipients and providers. The Gerontologist, 56, 990-996.
FriemelT. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old. New Media & Society, 18, 313-331.
11.
FroschD. L.MayS. G.RendleK. A. S.TietbohlC.ElwynG. (2012). Authoritarian physicians and patients’ fear of being labeled “difficult” among key obstacles to shared decision making. Health Affairs, 31, 1030-1038.
12.
GalarceE. M.RamanadhanS.ViswanathK. (2011). Health information seeking. In ThompsonT. L.ParrottR.NussbaumJ. F. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (2nd ed., pp. 167-180). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
GualtieriL. N. (2009, April). The doctor as the second opinion and the Internet as the first. Paper Presented at the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, NY.
14.
HaluzaD.NaszayM.StockingerA.JungwirthD. (2017). Digital natives versus digital immigrants: Influence of online health information seeking on the doctor-patient relationship. Health Communication, 32, 1342-1349.
15.
HuangM.HansenD.XieB. (2012, February). Older adults’ online health information seeking behavior. Paper presented at the iConference 2012, Toronto, Canada.
16.
HunsakerA.HargittaiE. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20, 3937-3954.
17.
ImesR. S.BylundC. L.SabeeC. M.RoutsongT. R.SanfordA. A. (2008). Patients’ reasons for refraining from discussing Internet health information with their healthcare providers. Health Communication, 23, 538-547.
18.
IversonS. A.HowardK. B.PenneyB. K. (2007). Impact of Internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 108, 699-711.
19.
KivitsJ. (2006). Informed patients and the Internet: A mediated context for consultations with health professionals. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 269-282.
LeeK.HotiK.HughesJ. D.EmmertonL. M. (2014). Dr Google and the consumer: A qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(2), e262.
22.
LeeK.HotiK.HughesJ. D.EmmertonL. M. (2015). Consumer use of “Dr Google”: A Survey on health information-seeking behaviors and navigational needs. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(12), e288.
23.
LeeK.HotiK.HughesJ. D.EmmertonL. M. (2017). Dr Google is here to stay but health care professionals are still valued. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), e210.
24.
MedlockS.EslamiS.AskariM.ArtsD. L.SentD.De RooijS.Abu-HannaA. (2015). Health Information–Seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), e10.
25.
MillerL. M. S.BellR. A. (2012). Online health information seeking: The influence of age, information trustworthiness, and search challenges. Journal of Aging and Health, 24, 525-541.
26.
MorrisonR. (2015). Silver surfers search for gold: A study into the online information-seeking skills of those over fifty. Ageing International, 40, 300-310.
27.
OngL. M. L.De HaesJ. C. J. M.HoosA. M.LammesF. B. (1995). Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 3, 157-174.
28.
RoterD. L.HallJ. A. (2011). How medical interaction shapes and reflects the physician-patient relationship. In ThompsonT. L.ParrottR.NussbaumJ. F. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (2nd ed., pp. 55-68). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
SandersK.Sánchez ValleM.VinarasM.LlorenteC. (2015). Do we trust and are we empowered by “Dr. Google”? Older Spaniards’ uses and views of digital healthcare communication. Public Relations Review, 41, 794-800.
30.
ScottG.McCarthyD. M.AldeenA. Z.CzerniakA.CourtneyD. M.DresdenS. M. (2017). Use of online health information by geriatric and adult emergency department patients. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24, 796-802.
31.
SilverM. P. (2015). Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: A qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), e19.
32.
SommerhalderK.AbrahamA.ZuffereyM. C.BarthJ.AbelT. (2009). Internet information and medical consultations: Experiences from patients’ and physicians’ perspectives. Patient Education and Counseling, 77, 266-271.
TanS. S.GoonawardeneN. (2017). Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(1), e9.
35.
ThompsonT. L.RobinsonJ. D.BeiseckerA. E. (2004). The older patient-physician interaction. In NussbaumJ. F.CouplandJ. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (2nd ed., pp. 451-477). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division. (2017). World population prospects 2017. Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/
37.
VandermindenJ.PotterS. J. (2010). Challenges to the doctor–patient relationship in the twenty-first century. In CockerhamW. C. (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to medical sociology (pp. 355-372). Chichester, UK: Blackwell.
38.
Van RielN.AuwerxK.DebbautP.Van HeesS.SchoenmakersB. (2017). The effect of Dr Google on doctor–patient encounters in primary care: A quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study. BJGP Open, 1, Article 2. doi:10.3399/bjgpopen17X100833
39.
WaldH. S.DubeC. E.AnthonyD. C. (2007). Untangling the web—The impact of Internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 68, 218-224.
40.
XieB. (2009). Older adults’ health information wants in the Internet age: Implications for patient–provider relationships. Journal of Health Communication, 14, 510-524.
