Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-9
Integrative Nursing and Omaha System–Based Nursing Care Interventions in Older Women Feeling Loneliness (INOSEL): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
This article presents the planned protocol for a study that investigates the effects of nursing care interventions based on Integrative Nursing (IN) and the Omaha System. The Omaha System is a nursing classification system focused on holistic care and used in determining nursing diagnoses and applying and evaluating interventions.
Design:
This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design.
Method:
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Statement 2013 checklist is used in this study. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) flowchart is used in this protocol. After the level of loneliness of older women is determined by the Loneliness Scale for the Elderly in a family health center, women with high levels of loneliness will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. Nursing care interventions consist of group-based (sightseeing, picnics, theater, cinema, group education, and charity activities) and person-centered interventions, according to IN and the Omaha System, for 12 weeks.
Conclusions:
This protocol will test the effectiveness of nursing care interventions that include a comprehensive (physical, psychological, social, and spiritual) evaluation. The results will help contribute to the provision of care in terms of IN and the Omaha System and guide health professionals and researchers.
AkgülH.YeşilyaprakB. (2015). Adaption of loneliness scale for elderly into Turkish culture: Validity and reliability study. Elderly Issues Research Journal, 8(1), 34-45.
AnilR.PrasadK. N.PuttaswamyM. (2016). The prevalence of loneliness and its determinants among geriatric population in Bengaluru City, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 3(11), 3246-3251. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20163944
BaharZ.BeşerA.GördesN.ErsinF.KıssalA. (2008). Healthy Life Style Behavior Scale II: A reliability and validity study. Journal of Cumhuriyet University School of Nursing, 12(1), 1-13.
6.
BindelL. (2018). Effects of integrated learning: Explicating a mathematical concept in inquiry-based science camps. Logos Berlin.
7.
BonsignoreM.BarkowK.JessenF.HeunR. (2001). Validity of the five-item WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in an elderly population. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 251(Suppl. 2), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035123
ChavesL.Aranha GilC. (2015). Older people’s concepts of spirituality, related to aging and quality of life. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 20(12), 3641-3652. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320152012.19062014
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
CowlishawS.NieleS.TeshuvaK.BrowningC.KendigH. A. L. (2012). Older adults’ spirituality and life satisfaction: A longitudinal test of social support and sense of coherence as mediating mechanisms. Ageing & Society, 33(7), 1243-1262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000633
12.
DahlbergL.McKeeK. J. (2014). Correlates of social and emotional loneliness in older people: Evidence from an English community study. Aging & Mental Health, 18(4), 504-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2013.856863
DelaneyC.WestraB.LeuningC.MonsenK. (2014). Informatics and integrative healthcare. In KreitzerM.KoithanM. (Eds.), Integrative nursing (pp. 109-121). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199860739.003.0009
15.
EkerD.ArkarH. (1995). Çokboyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeği’nin faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği [The factorial structure, validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 34, 45-55.
16.
EkerD.ArkarH.YaldızH. (2001). Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 12(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06536-000
17.
ErdoğanS.EsinN. M. (2006). The Turkish version of the Omaha System: Its use in practice-based family nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 26(5), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.11.009
18.
ErdoğanS.SecginliS.CosansuG.NahcivanN. O.EsinM. N.AktasE.MonsenK. (2013). Using the Omaha System to describe health problems, interventions, and outcomes in home care in Istanbul, Turkey: A student informatics research experience. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 31(6), 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1097/NXN.0b013e318282eala
19.
ErdoğanS.NahcivanN.EsinN.SeçginliS.CoşansuG.ArdıçA. (2016). Omaha System. Information management in nursing (pp. 10-48). Nobel Medicine Bookstore.
20.
EsinN. (1997). Promotion and determination of health behaviours of the workers who work in the industry [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Istanbul University Health Science Institute].
21.
HalconL.ScheinC.CheungC. (2014). Integrative nursing of older adults across the continuum. In KreitzerM.KoithanM. (Eds.), Integrative nursing (pp. 367-380). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199860739.003.0028
22.
HallalP. C.VictoraC. G. (2004). Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36(3), 556. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000117161.66394.07
23.
IlgazA.AkgözA.GözümS. (2019). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the social inclusion scale. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics, 22(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.31086/TJGERI.2019.88
24.
JonesC. A.SieverJ.KnuffK.Van BergenC.MickP.LittleJ.JonesG.MurphyM.-A.KurtzD.MillerH. (2019). Walk, talk and listen: A pilot randomised controlled trial targeting functional fitness and loneliness in older adults with hearing loss. BMJ Open, 9(4), e026169. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026169
25.
KällA.JägholmS.HesserH.AnderssonF.MathaldiA.NorkvistB. T.ShafranR.AnderssonG. (2020). Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for loneliness: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 51(1), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.001
26.
KangH. W.ParkM.WallaceJ. P. (2018). The impact of perceived social support, loneliness, and physical activity on quality of life in South Korean older adults. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 7(2), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.05.003
27.
KavoosianN.HosseinzadehK.JalisehH. K.KarboroA. (2018). The relationship between spiritual health and loneliness among the elderly in Karaj—2016. Journal of Research on Religion and Health, 4(2), 7-15.
KreitzerM. J. (2015). Integrative nursing: application of principles across clinical settings. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal, 6(2), e0016. https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10200
30.
KulakçıH.EmiroğluO. N. (2011). Evaluation of the usability of the Omaha System in the care of elderly people live in residential home. Dokuz Eylül University School of Nursing Electronic Journal, 4(1), 25-33.
31.
KulakçıH.EmiroğluO. N. (2012). The usability of the Omaha System in identifying the health needs, nursing interventions and outcomes of the elderly living in a nursing home. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal, 19(1), 36-50.
32.
MeltzerH.BebbingtonP.DennisM. S.JenkinsR.McManusS.BrughaT. S. (2013). Feelings of loneliness among adults with mental disorder. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0515-8
33.
MonsenK. A.FosterD. J.GomezT.PoulsenJ. K.MastJ.WestraB. L.FishmanE. (2011). Evidence-based standardized care plans for use internationally to improve home care practice and population health. Applied Clinical Informatics, 2(3), 373-383. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2011-03-RA-0023
34.
MonsenK. A.PetersJ.SchlesnerS.VanderboomC. E.HollandD. E. (2015). The gap in big data: Getting to wellbeing, strengths, and a whole person perspective. Global Advances, 4(3), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.040
35.
MyersJ. L.WellA. D.LorchR. F. (2010). Research design and statistical analysis (3rd ed.). Routledge.
OthmanS. Y.MohamedA. M.El-SoussiA. H.El-MonaemS. A. A.AhmedF. R. (2020). Effect of integrative nursing practices on cognitive recovery among severe traumatic brain injury patients. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 10(10), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v10n10p75
41.
OzturkM. (2005). The validity and reliability of the international physical activity questionnaire and determination of physical activity levels of students studying at the university. Hacettepe University.
42.
PapathanassoglouE. D. E.HadjibalassiM.MiltiadousP.LambrinouE.PapastavrouE.PaikousisL.KyprianouT. (2018). Effects of an integrative nursing intervention on pain in critically ill patients: A pilot clinical trial. American Journal of Critical Care, 27(3), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2018271
SeckerJ.HackingS.KentL.ShentonJ.SpandlerH. (2009). Development of a measure of social inclusion for arts and mental health project participants. Journal of Mental Health, 18(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230701677803
47.
SerajiM.ShojaezadeD.RakhshaniF. (2016). The relationship between spiritual well-being and quality of life among the elderly people residing in Zahedan City (South-East of Iran). Elderly Health Journal, 2(2), 84-88.
48.
SimonM. A.ChangE. S.ZhangM.RuanJ.DongX. (2014). The prevalence of loneliness among U.S. Chinese older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(7), 1172-1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314533722
49.
SingerC. (2018). Health effects of social isolation and loneliness. Journal of Aging Life Care, 28(1), 4-8.
50.
SteptoeA.ShankarA.DemakakosP.WardleJ. (2013). Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 110(15), 5797-5801. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219686110
51.
WalkerS. N.SechristK. R.PenderN. J. (1987). The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research, 36(2), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002
52.
WareJ. E.Davis-AveryA.DonaldC. A. (1978). Conceptualization and measurement of health insurance study. Vol. v. General Health Perceptions. Rand.Corp.
53.
YeC.BeyeneJ.BrowneG.ThabaneL. (2014). Estimating treatment effects in randomised controlled trials with non-compliance: A simulation study. BMJ Open, 4(6), e005362. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005362
54.
ZimetG. D.DahlemN. W.ZimetS. G.FarleyG. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
