Phenomenological research is increasing in popularity in nursing research for good reason. The qualitative research method allows an in-depth exploration of patient lived experience. This knowledge has the potential to enhance quality of holistic patient care. To undertake this method of inquiry, however, it is imperative that holistic nurse researchers understand the philosophical underpinnings of the method and are familiar with the two major types of phenomenology in order to approach the study in a scholarly manner. The purpose of this article is to explicate the method’s historical roots of phenomenology, its evolution, its two major traditions and their differences, and some of the specialized terminology unique to phenomenology’s jargon so that their studies can contribute to sound nursing science and complete patient care.
AgreyL. G. (2014). Philosophical hermeneutics: A tradition with promise. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2, 188-192.
2.
American Holistic Nurses Association & American Nurses Association. (2013). Holistic nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
3.
ArrienS. (2018). The hermeneutical turn of phenomenology in the young Heidegger’s thought. In GeniusasS.FairfieldP. (Eds.), Hermeneutics and phenomenology: Figures and themes (pp. 138-148). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
4.
BeechI. (1999). Bracketing in phenomenological research. Nursing Researcher, 6(3), 35-51.
5.
BerglundM.WestinL.SvanströmR.SundlerA J. (2012). Suffering caused by care: Patients’ experiences from hospital settings. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being, 7, 1-9.
CarelH. (2012). Phenomenology as a resource for patients. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 37, 96-113.
8.
ColaizziP. (1978). Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In ValleR. S.KingM. (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48-71). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
ConverseM. (2012). Philosophy of phenomenology: How understanding aids research. Nurse Researcher, 20(1), 28-32.
10.
CreswellJ.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
DahlbergK. (2011). Lifeworld phenomenology for caring and health care research. In ThompsonG.DykesF.DowneS. (Eds.), Qualitative research in midwifery and childbirth: Phenomenological approaches (pp. 19-33). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
DavidsenA. S. (2013). Phenomenological approaches in psychology and health sciences. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10, 318-339.
13.
DowlingM.CooneyA. (2012). Research approaches related to phenomenology: Negotiating a complex landscape. Nurse Researcher, 20(2), 21-27.
14.
Enzman HinesM. (2017). A view of caring within holistic nursing. Beginnings, 37(6), 6-24.
15.
FarinaG. (2014). Some reflections on the phenomenological method. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 7, 50-62.
16.
FøllesdalD. (2004). Husserl on evidence and justification. In MoranD.EmbreeL. E. (Eds.), Phenomenology: Critical concepts in philosophy (pp. 207-230). New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
GadamerH. (1989). Truth and method (2nd ed.). London, England: Sheed & Ward.
18.
GiorgiA. (1992). Description versus interpretation: Competing alternative strategies for qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 23, 119-135.
19.
GiorgiA. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
20.
GiorgiA. (2014). An affirmation of the phenomenological psychological descriptive method: A response to Rennie (2012). Psychological Methods, 19, 542-551.
21.
HamillC.SinclairH. A. H. (2010). Bracketing: Practical considerations in Husserlian phenomenological research. Nurse Researcher, 17(2), 16-24.
22.
HeideggerM. (1972). My way to phenomenology. In StambaughJ. (Trans.), On time and being (pp. 74-82). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1963)
23.
HeideggerM. (1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein and Zeit (StambaughJ., Trans.). Albany: SUNY Press. (Original work published 1953)
24.
HenryS. (2009). Social construction of crime. In MillerJ. (Ed.), 21st Century criminology: A reference handbook (pp. 296-305). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
HusserlE. (1967). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (Boyce GibsonW. R., Trans., 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Collier Books. (Original work published 1913)
26.
HusserlE. (2001). Logical investigations: Volume one (FindlayJ. N., Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1900)
27.
KleinP.WestcottM. (1994). The changing character of phenomenological psychology. Canadian Psychology, 35, 133-157.
28.
LavertyS. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21-35.
29.
MabaquiaoN. (2005). Husserl’s’ theory of intentionality. Philosophia: An International Journal of Philosophy, 34, 24-49.
30.
MarinoS. (2010). Gadamer on Heidegger: Is the history of being “just” another philosophy of history?Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 41, 287-303.
McIntyreR.Woodruff SmithD. (1989). Theory of intentionality. In MohantyJ. N.McKennaW. R. (Eds.), Husserl’s phenomenology: A textbook (pp. 147-179). Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.
33.
Merleau-PontyM. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (LandesD., Trans.). London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1945)
34.
MorseJ. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 3-5.
35.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
PaloušM. (2013). A philosopher and his history: Jan Patočka’s reflections on the end of Europe and the arrival of the post-European epoch. Thesis Eleven, 116, 77-98.
37.
PattonC. M. (2017). Workplace conflict, management, and leadership implications: An interpretive phenomenology of medical imaging technologists (Doctoral dissertation). Available from the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (Order No. 10689208)
38.
PietkiewiczI.SmithJ. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretive phenomenological analysis in qualitative psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 20, 7-14.
39.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR. S.HallinS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41-60). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
40.
PoltR. (1999). Heidegger: An introduction. London, England: Routledge.
41.
QuayJ. (2016). Learning phenomenology with Heidegger: Experiencing the phenomenological “starting point” as the beginning of phenomenological research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48, 484-497.
42.
RatherM. L. (1994). Schooling for oppression: A critical hermeneutical analysis of the lived experience of the returning RN student. Journal of Nursing Education, 33, 263-271.
43.
ReinersG. M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing and Care, 1(5), 1-3.
44.
RennieD. L. (2012). Qualitative research as methodical hermeneutics. Psychological Methods, 17, 385-398.
45.
RicoeurP. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation (SavageD., Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46.
SheehanT. (1997). Husserl and Heidegger: The making and unmaking of a relationship. In SheehanT.PalmerR. E. (Eds.), Edmund Husserl: Psychological and transcendental phenomenology and the confrontation with Heidegger (pp. 1-34). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science and Business Media.
47.
SionA. (2003). Phenomenology: Basing knowledge on appearance. Geneva, Switzerland: The Logician.
48.
SmithD. W. (2013). Husserl (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
SokolowskiR. (1971). The structure and content of Husserl’sLogical Investigations. Inquiry, 14, 318-347. doi:10.1080/00201747108601649
51.
SokolowskiR. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
VagleM. D. (2014). Crafting phenomenological research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
53.
WillisP. (2001). The “things themselves” in phenomenology. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 1(1), 1-12.
54.
WilsonT. D. (2002). Alfred Schutz, phenomenology and research methodology for information behaviour research. New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3(71), 1-15.
55.
ZahaviD. (2008), Phenomenology. In MoranD. (Ed.), Routledge companion to twentieth-century philosophy (pp. 661-692). London, England: Routledge.
