Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of practice is one of the most ambitious attempts to overcome the structure/agency dichotomy in twentieth-century sociology. Yet it has been criticized for determinism, circularity, and theoretical incoherence. Critics argue that habitus collapses agency into structure, operates tautologically by deriving class from dispositions and dispositions from class, and fails to account for dispositional plurality or historical change. This article contends that such criticisms stem from a substantialist misreading of a fundamentally relational theory. Drawing on Hegel’s dialectic of Universal, Particular, and Individual as a grammar of mediation, we reconstruct habitus as the relational operator through which objective positions become generative of practice. What appears as circularity emerges instead as recursive mediation, and dispositional plurality presupposes rather than refutes relational unity. The article offers an ontological clarification that strengthens practice theory as a framework for analyzing social reproduction and transformation.
AlexanderJC (1995) Fin de Siècle Social Theory: Relativism, Reduction and the Problem of Reason. Verso Books.
2.
ArcherMS (2009) Teoría Social Realista: El Enfoque Morfogenético (trad. CherniloD). Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
3.
BourdieuP (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information24(2): 195–220.
4.
BourdieuP (1987) What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley journal of sociology32: 1–17.
5.
BourdieuP (1988) Homo Academicus. Stanford University Press.
6.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.
7.
BourdieuP (1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford University Press.
8.
BourdieuP (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Stanford University Press.
9.
BourdieuP (2009) O Poder Simbólico. Bertrand Brasil.
10.
BourdieuP (2013) A Economia das Trocas Simbólicas. Perspectiva.
11.
Cirne-LimaCRSoaresA (2005) Being, nothing, becoming: Hegel and Us—a formalization (Part 1). Filosofia Unisinos6(1): 5–39.
12.
CrossleyN (2001) The phenomenological habitus and its construction. Theory and Society30(1): 81–120.
13.
DaolioJRigoniACCRobleOJ (2012) Corporeidade: o legado de Marcel Mauss e Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Pro-Posições23: 179–193.
14.
DubetF (2019) Le Temps des Passions Tristes. Média Diffusion.
15.
EmirbayerM (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology103(2): 281–317. DOI: 10.1086/231209.
16.
FriedlandR (2009) The endless fields of Pierre Bourdieu. Organization16(6): 887–917. DOI: 10.1177/1350508409341115.
17.
HaasA (2007) Being and implication: on Hegel and the Greeks. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy3(2–3): 192–211.
18.
HabermasJ (2000) O Discurso Filosófico da Modernidade. Martins Fontes.
19.
HegelGWF (2001) The Philosophy of History. Batoche Books.
20.
HegelGWF (2010) Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: The Science of Logic. Cambridge University Press.
21.
HegelGWF (2018) Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press.
22.
HoganT (2004) Against reduction: Jeffrey Alexander and the constructive tasks of social theory. Thesis Eleven79(1): 37–42.
23.
HoulgateS (2005) An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History. John Wiley & Sons.
24.
HoulgateS (2006) The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. Purdue University Press.
25.
LahireB (2002) Homem Plural: Os Determinantes da Ação. Vozes Editora.
26.
LahireB (2003) From the habitus to an individual heritage of dispositions. Towards a sociology at the level of the individual. Poetics31(5–6): 329–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2003.08.002.
27.
LahireB (2004) Retratos Sociológicos: Disposições e Variações Individuais. Artmed Editora.
28.
Merleau-PontyM (2005) Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge Classics.
29.
PasseronJCCarouxJ (1986) Hegel ou le passager clandestine La reproduction sociale et l’Histoire. Esprit (1940–), 115(6): 63–81.
30.
RepaL (2010) Hegel, Habermas e a Modernidade. Revista Dois Pontos7(4): 151–162.
31.
RibeiroD (1988) O Dilema da América Latina: Estruturas de Poder e Forças Insurgentes. Editora Vozes.
32.
RileyD (2017) Bourdieu’s class theory: the academic as revolutionary. Catalyst: A Journal of Theory & Strategy1(2): 107–136.
33.
RitzerG (1975) Sociology: a multiple paradigm science. The American Sociologist10(3): 156–167.
34.
SantosVLC (2017) O processo de produção do conhecimento dialético em Hegel. Saberes: Revista Interdisciplinar de Filosofia e Educação17: 33–45.
35.
SchutzA (1979) Relações interativas: intersubjetividade e compreensão. In: WagnerH (Org.), Fenomenologia e Relações Sociais: Textos Escolhidos de Alfred Schutz. Zahar Editores.
36.
SellCE (2014) Weber no século XXI: desafios e dilemas de um paradigma weberiano. Dados57(1): 35–71.
37.
Thiry-CherquesHR (2006) Pierre Bourdieu: a teoria na prática. Revista de Administração Pública40: 27–53.
38.
VandenbergheF (1999) The real is relational: an inquiry into Pierre Bourdieu’s constructivist epistemology. Sociological Theory17(1): 32–67.
