This paper discusses how Elisian ideas on memory could have changed the history of Memory Studies ideas. The history of the phenomenon of memory inside the sociological field reflects the foundational dichotomies of the discipline: macro × micro dimensions and biological × social realms. Many of the hurdles and discussions of Memory Studies still lie upon these dichotomies. Although Elias has never investigated this topic properly, he has a rich discussion on relationality, interdisciplinarity, and processuality. These three aspects would dissolve many of the actual hurdles faced by Memory Studies.
BlondelC (2011 [1926]) Revue critique: M. Halbwachs Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. In: OlickJInitzy-SeroussiVLevyD (eds) The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 156–157.
6.
BucholcM (2013) On the potential of Norbert Elias’s approach in the social memory research in Central and Eastern Europe. Polish Sociological Review183: 317–334.
7.
ConnertonP (1989) How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CordeiroDV (2021) To which past do we belong? Self and narrative in a Brazilian mnemonic community of former institutionalized children. Memory Studies14: 987–1001.
9.
CrossleyN (2010). Towards Relational Sociology. Londres: Routledge
10.
DépelteauF (2008) Relational thinking: A critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency. Sociological Theory26(1): 51–73.
11.
DépelteauF (2015) Relational sociology, pragmatism, transactions and social fields. International Review of Sociology25(1): 45–64.
12.
DepelteauF (2018) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
EliasN (1971) Sociology of knowledge: New perspectives. Sociology5(2): 149–168.
15.
EliasN (1978) What is Sociology?Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
16.
EliasN (1991) The Symbol Theory. London: Sage Publications.
17.
EliasN (1994) The Established and the Outsiders. London: Routledge.
18.
EliasN (2001a) Elias Por Ele Mesmo (Elias Über Such Selbst). Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Zahar.
19.
EliasN (2001b) The Society of Individuals. New York, NY: Continuum.
20.
EliasN (2001c) Involvement and Detachment. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
21.
EliasN (2010) Sociologie et psychiatrie (1969–1972), Civilisation et psychosomatique (1988), Le concept freudien de société et au-delà (1990). In: La Découvertecoll (ed.) Au-Delà de Freud: Sociologie, Psychologie, Psychanalyse. Paris: Textes à l’appui, pp.47–185.
22.
EliasN (2021) Über Die Zeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
23.
EmirbayerM (1997) . Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103: 281–317.
24.
FentressJWickhamC (1992) Social Memory. London: Blackwell Publishers.
25.
FreudS (1990 [1920]) Beyond the Pleasure Principle. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
26.
GlaeserA (2005) An ontology for the ethnographic analysis of social processes: Extending the extended-case method. The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice49(3): 16–45.
27.
HalbwachsM (1941 [2008]) La Topographie Légendaire Des Évangiles En Terre Sainte. Paris: PUF.
28.
HalbwachsM (1997 [1925]) Les Cadres Sociaux de La Mémoire. Paris: Ed. Albin Michel.
29.
HeersminkR (2017) Distributed selves: Personal identity and extended memory systems. Synthese194(8): 3135–3151.
30.
HeersminkR (2018) The narrative self, distributed memory, and evocative objects. Philosophical Studies175(8): 1829–1849.
31.
KantI (2015). Crítica da Razão Pura. São Paulo: Editora Vozes.
32.
NoraP (1984) Les Lieux de Mémoire. Paris: Gallimard.
33.
NoraP (1986) Les Lieux de Mémoire. Paris: Gallimard.
34.
NoraP (1989) Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations26: 7–24.
35.
NoraP (1992) Les Lieux de Mémoire. Paris: Gallimard.
36.
OlickJK (1999) Collective memory: The two cultures. Sociological Theory17(3): 333–348.
37.
OlickJKRobbinsJ (1998) Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology24: 105–140.
38.
RenwickC (2012) British Sociology’s Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past. London: Palgrave.
39.
RosenthalG (2016) Investigating Collective and Individual Dynamics—Towards an Interpretative Social Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2) 2.
40.
SchafersB (2001) Soziale prozesse. In: Schafers B. Grundebegriffe der Soziologie. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
41.
SchützeF (1984) Kognitive figuren des autobiographischen stregreiferzählens. In: KohliMGuentherR (eds) Biographie und Wirklichkeit. Stuttgart: Meztler, pp.78–117.
42.
SchwartzB (1982) The social context of commemoration: A study in collective memory. Social Forces; A Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation61(2): 374–402.
43.
SuttonJ (2008) Material agency, skills and history: Distributed cognition and the archaeology of memory. In:KnappettCMalafourisL (eds) Material Agency: Towards a Non-anthropocentric Approach. New York, NY: Springer, pp.37–55.
44.
TabboniS (2001) The idea of social time in Norbert Elias. Time & Society10(1): 5–27.
45.
WertschJ (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
WertschJ (2002) Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
ZerubavelE (1997) Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
