This article intervenes in the debate about political power and state autonomy by examining the 2011 reform to the Florida Retirement System pension plan. By analyzing a single case during the neoliberal period, it contributes to expanding knowledge of how state power functions, on the ground, contemporarily. First, I analyze the state’s role in creating and maintaining markets through legislative controls. Rather than removing state influence from the economy, the state plays a major role in securing markets exploitable for profit. Second, as neoliberal organizations and actors gain power and influence, at times infiltrating the state, the state loses autonomy to those actors, strengthening the political and economic power of the capitalist class vis-à-vis workers. The qualitative data show strong networks between organizations with corporate influence, legislators, and Governor Rick Scott. These networks allow organizations to set political priorities in a way that goes beyond normal interest group lobbying.
BlackburnR (2006) The global pension crisis: from gray capitalism to responsible accumulation. Politics & Society34(2): 135–186.
6.
BlythM (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BrainardKBrownA (2018) Significant Reforms to State Retirement Systems. Spotlight on, December. New York: National Association of State Retirement Administrators.
8.
BrainardKBrownA (2022) NASRA Issue Brief: Cost-of-Living Adjustments. NASRA Issue Brief, June. New York: National Association of State Retirement Administrators.
9.
ChoatS (2018) Everything for sale? Neoliberalism and the limits of Michael Sandel’s philosophical critique of markets. New Political Science40(1): 1–14.
DansPGrovesS (eds) (2023) Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise. Project 2025. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
12.
DixonM (2011) Gov. Rick Scott sued over pension reform; teachers union leads fight against making state workers pay in. The Florida Times Union, 21June.
13.
DomhoffGW (1990) The Power Elite and the State: How Policy Is Made in America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
14.
DomhoffGW (1992) The death of state autonomy theory: a review of Skocpol’s protecting soldiers and mothers. Critical Sociology19(2): 103–116.
15.
DomhoffGW (1996) State Autonomy or Class Dominance?: Case Studies on Policy Making in America. Social Institutions and Social Change. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
DomhoffGW (2006) Who Rules America?: Power, Politics, & Social Change. 5th ed.Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
17.
EdsallTB (1984) The New Politics of Inequality. 1st ed.New York: W.W. Norton.
EvansPBRueschemeyerDSkocpolT (eds) (1985) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Florida House of Representatives (FHR) (2011a) Appropriations Committee: Action Packet (Revised)30March. Tallahassee, FL: Florida House of Representatives.
Florida House of Representatives (FHR) (2011c) Government Operations Subcommittee: Action Packet Committee Meeting Report, 17March. Tallahassee, FL: Florida House of Representatives.
Florida House of Representatives (FHR) (2011e) State Affairs Committee: Action Packet Committee Meeting Report, 24March. Tallahassee, FL: Florida House of Representatives.
Florida TaxWatch (2010) Report and Recommendations of the Florida TaxWatch Government Cost Savings Task Force for Fiscal Year 2011–12. Tallahassee, FL: Florida TaxWatch.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
Hertel-FernandezA (2019) State Capture: How Conservative Activists, Big Businesses, and Wealthy Donors Reshaped the American States—And the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.
LindblomCE (1982) The market as prison. The Journal of Politics44(2): 323–336.
41.
MagdoffFFosterJB (2023) Grand theft capital: the increasing exploitation and robbery of the U.S. working class. Monthly Review75(1): 1–22.
42.
MarxK (1981) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1: Penguin Classics. London: Penguin Books.
43.
MayerJ (2017) Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. New York: First Anchor Books.
44.
McCarthyMA (2017) Dismantling Solidarity: Capitalist Politics and American Pensions Since the New Deal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
MilibandR (1965) Marx and the state. Socialist Register2: 1–19.
46.
MorganKJOrloffAS (2017) The Many Hands of the State: Theorizing Political Authority and Social Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
MunnellAHAubryJPCafarelliM (2014) Defined Contribution Plans in the Public Sector: An Update. Boston, MA: Center for State & Local Government Excellence.
48.
MyersEATopoleskiJJ (2021) A Visual Depiction of the Shift from Defined Benefit (DB) to Defined Contribution (DC) Pension Plans in the Private Sector. In Focus, December. Congressional Research Service.
49.
Office of Public Information (OPI) (2011). OPI Pulse: Employee Retirement, HB 1405/SB 2100. OPI Pulse, 16May.
50.
ParisotJ (2023) Capitalism and the creation of the U.S. constitution. Studies in American Political Development37(2): 199–211.
RomaniR (2022) Neoliberals’ economic liberalism: a checkered history. Constellations (Oxford, England)29(3): 359–374.
56.
RueschemeyerDEvansPB (1985) The state and economic transformation: toward and analysis of the conditions underlying effective intervention. In: EvansPBRueschemeyerDSkocpolT (eds) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.44–77.
57.
RussellJW (2021) The Labor Guide to Retirement Plans: For Union Organizers and Employees. New York: Monthly Review Press.
58.
SkocpolT (1985) Bringing the state back. In: EvansPBRueschemeyerDSkocpolT (eds) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.3–37.
59.
SkocpolT (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
60.
SmithBde CarvalhoL (2019) Have states stopped steering markets? Rethinking neoliberal interventionism and periodization in the United States and the United Kingdom. In: DawesSLenormandM (eds) Neoliberalism in Context. Switzerland: Springer, pp.83–104.
61.
SmithC (2019) Americans for prosperity (2004–). In: AinsworthSHHarwardBM (eds). Political Groups, Parties, and Organizations that Shaped America: An Encyclopedia and Document Collection. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, pp.136–139.
62.
SmithMG (1965) The Plural Society in the British West Indies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Stepan-NorrisJ (2003) Left Out: Reds and America’s Industrial Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
Stepan-NorrisJKerrisseyJ (2023) Union Booms and Busts: The Ongoing Fight over the U.S. Labor Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
United States Department of Justice (USDJ) (2012) The Accomplishments of the U.S. Department of Justice 2001–2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General.
67.
United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (USDoL) (2021). Private Pension Plan Bulletin Historical Tables and Graphs 1975–2019. New York: USDoL.
68.
WalshMJBeachWW (2021) National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States, March 2021. New York: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
69.
WaterhouseBC (2021) The business roundtable and the politics of U.S. manufacturing decline in the global 1970s. Business History65(2): 329–344.
70.
WeirMSkocpolT (1985) State structures and the possibilities for “Keynesian” responses to the great depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States. In: RueschemeyerDSkocpolTEvansPB (eds) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.107–164.
